Tumor size is an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis and survival in early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE(S): To analyze the impact of tumor size (TS) on risk of lymph node metastasis (PLN) and prognosis in endometrioid endometrial cancer grossly confined to the uterus (EEC). METHOD(S): Patients with EEC grossly confined to the uterus were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset from 1988 to 2007. Only surgically treated patients were included. TS was analyzed as a continuous and categorical variable (TS ≤ 2 cm, >2-5 cm and >5 cm). Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULT(S): 19,692 patients met the inclusion criteria. In patients with TS ≤ 2 cm, only 2.7 % (88/3,244) had PLN; this increased to 5.8 % (372/6,355) with TS > 2-5 cm and 11.1 % (195/1,745) with TS > 5 cm. The odds of PLN increased by 14 % for each 1 cm increase in TS after controlling for age, race, depth of myometrial invasion and grade (HR 1.14, 95 % CI 1.10-1.19, p < 0.001). Further, TS was an independent predictor of disease-specific survival (DSS) even after adjusting for age, race, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, lymph node status and adjuvant radiation therapy (HR 1.13 for each 1 cm increment in TS, 95 % 1.08-1.18, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, larger TS (>5 cm) was significantly associated with worse DSS (HR 2.09, 95 % 1.31-3.35, p = 0.002); however, there was no significant difference between TS > 2-5 cm versus ≤2 cm (HR 1.25, 95 % 0.85-1.83, p = 0.25). The impact of TS remained significant on DSS in subset of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy with negative lymph nodes. CONCLUSION(S): TS was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis and disease-specific survival in patients with EEC grossly confined to the uterus. Tumor >5 cm was a predictor of disease-specific survival but no difference in outcome was noted between tumor >2-5 cm and tumor ≤2 cm.

Optimal surgical debulking in uterine papillary serous carcinoma affects survival.

OBJECTIVE: UPSC is similar to papillary serous ovarian carcinoma in its histology and pattern of spread. The survival advantage with optimal debulking for ovarian cancer has been demonstrated. We examined our experience with UPSC. METHODS: Seventy-eight UPSC patients were seen between 1995 and 2008 at Rush University Medical Center for surgery and/or adjuvant treatment. Information was obtained retrospectively from the Rush computer system, National Death Registry, and charts from chemotherapy, radiation, and gynecologic oncology. RESULTS: Mean survival was 67.1 months for all stages (95% CI 52.8-81.2), 47.6 months for stage III (95% CI 26.7-68.3), and 21.7 months for stage IV (95% CI 14.5-29.1). No deaths occurred in stages I and II. No significant survival difference was found between African-Americans and Whites (log-rank test, p=0.62), nor between full serous and mixed pathology (log-rank test, p=0.52). Optimally debulked stage IV patients had a mean survival of 30.9 months, compared to 10.3 months in suboptimally debulked patients (p<0.001). Optimal debulking had no significant effect on stage III survival (p=0.47). Although weight was not statistically significant (p=0.059), there was a trend associated with suboptimal debulking. The mean time to recurrence for stage I was 79.9 months (95% CI 12.8-54.9), stage III was 27.4 months (95% CI 7.8-47.1), and stage IV was 20.2 months (95% CI 11.1-29.4) (p<0.001). There were no recurrences in stage II. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that UPSC should be optimally debulked. Weight is a risk factor for suboptimal debulking, which decreases mean survival and time to recurrence.