Key Articles and Guidelines in the Management of Pericardial Syndromes.

Over the past two decades, emerging literature has shaped the management of pericardial syndromes and has evolved abundantly towards the creation of European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases. However, since the publication of the European guidelines in 2015, more data surrounding the management of pericardial syndromes have been published. Comprehensive reference materials with the most updated literature are warranted and can be pivotal in helping pharmacists make evidence-based and clinical decisions for patients diagnosed with pericardial syndromes. This compilation of key articles and guidelines will serve as a resource for pharmacists who are responsible for the care of patients with pericardial syndromes.

Circulating sphingolipids in heart failure.

Lack of significant advancements in early detection and treatment of heart failure have precipitated the need for discovery of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Over the past decade, circulating sphingolipids have elicited promising results as biomarkers that premonish adverse cardiac events. Additionally, compelling evidence directly ties sphingolipids to these events in patients with incident heart failure. This review aims to summarize the current literature on circulating sphingolipids in both human cohorts and animal models of heart failure. The goal is to provide direction and focus for future mechanistic studies in heart failure, as well as pave the way for the development of new sphingolipid biomarkers.

Comparison of Safety and Biological Efficacy of Anakinra (Kineret) Dispensed in Polycarbonate Plastic versus Borosilicate Glass Syringes: A Patient-Level Analysis of VCUART2 and VCUART3 Clinical Trials.

Anakinra is a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Kineret is available as a solution prepared in a borosilicate glass syringe. For implementing a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized clinical trial, anakinra is commonly transferred into plastic syringes. However, there is limited data on anakinra's stability in polycarbonate syringes. We described the results of our previous studies on the use of anakinra in glass (VCUART3) versus plastic syringes (VCUART2) compared with placebo. These studies were conducted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and we assessed the anti-inflammatory effects of anakinra versus placebo by comparing the area under the curve for high-sensitivity cardiac reactive protein (AUC-CRP) levels during the first 14 days of STEMI, its clinical effects on heart failure (HF) hospitalization, cardiovascular death, or new diagnosis of HF as well as adverse events profile between groups. The levels of AUC-CRP were 75 (50-255 mg·day/l) for anakinra in plastic syringes versus 255 (116-592 mg·day/l) in placebo and 60 (24-139 mg·day/l) and 86 (43-123 mg·day/l) for anakinra once and twice daily in glass syringes, respectively, compared with placebo 214 (131-394 mg·day/l). The rate of adverse events was also comparable between groups. There were no differences in the rate of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death in patients who received anakinra in plastic or glass syringes. Fewer cases of new-onset heart failure occurred in patients receiving anakinra in plastic or glass syringes compared with placebo. Anakinra stored in plastic (polycarbonate) syringes provides comparable biologic and clinical effect to glass (borosilicate) syringes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Anakinra (Kineret) 100 mg administered subcutaneously in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) for a duration of up to 14 days appears to have comparable safety and biological efficacy signals when delivered in prefilled glass or transferred into plastic polycarbonate syringes. This may have important implications for the feasibility of designing clinical trials in STEMI and other clinical conditions.

Safety, Tolerability, and Effects of a Single Subcutaneous Administration of SP16 - a SERPIN-like, Small Peptide Agonist of the Low-Density Lipoprotein-like Receptor 1- on the Acute Inflammatory Response in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Modulation of the inflammatory response is a promising therapeutic strategy in acute myocardial infarction. The novel approach is based on the anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective properties mediated by the engagement of the low-density lipoprotein‒related protein 1 (LRP1) receptor. SERPIN peptide 16 (SP16) is a synthetic, selective LRP1 agonist. We herein present the results of a study with a single subcutaneous administration of SP16 in 10 patients with STEMI, to appraise its safety and tolerability and explore the effects on the acute inflammatory response, infarct size, and cardiac function. METHODS: Ten patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled within 12 hours of symptoms onset and 6 hours of percutaneous coronary intervention in a single-center, single-arm, open-label study of a single subcutaneous administration of SP16 (0.2 mg/kg). Serial clinical biomarkers and echocardiography data were collected up to 12 months. The data are presented separately for the treatment group and compared with historical controls from a placebo-treated arm in a recently completed clinical trial (N = 28) with similar enrollment criteria. RESULTS: All ten patients with STEMI received subcutaneous administration of SP16, 381 [272-478] minutes after percutaneous coronary intervention, without any treatment-related adverse events. The area under the curve for C-reactive protein was 133 [46-528] mg·d/L in the SP16-treated group versus 286 [141-581] mg·d/L in the historical placebo-treated group ( P = 0.161). The area under the curve for creatine kinase-myocardial band was 1432 [675-3089] ng·d/mL in the SP16-treated group versus 2367 [830-4750] ng·d/mL in the historical placebo-treated patients ( P = 0.428). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 46% [39-54] at baseline and 51% [46-58] at 1 year follow-up in SP16-treated patients (interval change 5% [-0.3% to +9%] P = 0.05) and 44% [38%-56%] at baseline and 53% [43%-59%] at 1 year follow-up in historical placebo-treated patients (interval change 3% [-5% to 10%], P = 0.305). CONCLUSION: A single subcutaneous administration of SP16, a synthetic targeted LRP1 agonist, was safe and well-tolerated in patients with STEMI. A trend toward reduction in the inflammatory response and infarct size with SP16 was noted; however, the sample size for this study was not based on formal statistical criteria. More extensive studies are planned to determine the clinical efficacy of SP16 in STEMI.NCT: NCT04225533.

Patient Perceptions of Exertion and Dyspnea With Interleukin-1 Blockade in Patients With Recently Decompensated Systolic Heart Failure.

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockade is an anti-inflammatory treatment that may affect exercise capacity in heart failure (HF). We evaluated patient-reported perceptions of exertion and dyspnea at submaximal exercise during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of IL-1 blockade in patients with systolic HF (REDHART [Recently Decompensated Heart Failure Anakinra Response Trial]). Patients underwent maximal CPET at baseline, 2, 4, and 12 weeks and rated their perceived level of exertion (RPE, on a scale from 6 to 20) and dyspnea on exertion (DOE, on a scale from 0 to 10) every 3 minutes throughout exercise. Patients also answered 2 questionnaires to assess HF-related quality of life: the Duke Activity Status Index and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. From baseline to the 12-week follow-up, IL-1 blockade significantly reduced RPE and DOE at 3- and 6-minutes during CPET without changing values for heart rate, oxygen consumption, and cardiac workload at 3- and 6-minutes. Linear regression identified 6-minute RPE to be a strong independent predictor of both physical symptoms (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; ß = 0.474, p = 0.002) and perceived exercise capacity (Duke Activity Status Index; ß = -0.443, p = 0.008). In conclusion, patient perceptions of exertion and dyspnea at submaximal exercise may be valuable surrogates for quality of life and markers of response to IL-1 blockade in patients with HF.

Acute Effects of Liothyronine Administration on Cardiovascular System and Energy Metabolism in Healthy Volunteers.

Context: The pharmacokinetics of liothyronine causes concerns for cardiovascular toxicity. While the effects of sustained increase in serum T3 concentrations are well described, little is known on the effects of acute changes in T3 concentrations due to rapid action of thyroid hormone. Objective: To assess the clinical relevance of transient increase of T3 levels on cardiovascular system and energy metabolism. Setting: Double-blind, three arms, placebo controlled, cross-over study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03098433). Study Participants: Twelve volunteers (3 females, 9 males), age 27.7 ± 5.1 years. Intervention: Oral administration of liothyronine 0.7 mcg/kg, equimolar dose of levothyroxine (0.86 mcg/kg), or placebo in three identical study visits. Blood samples for total T3, free T4 were collected at times 0', 60' 120' 180' 240'. Continuous recording of heart rate, blood pressure, and hemodynamic data was performed using the volume clamp method. Resting energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry. An echocardiogram was performed on each study visit at baseline and after the last blood sampling. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in cardiovascular function and energy expenditure. Results: Following the administration of liothyronine, serum T3 reached a Cmax of 421 ± 57 ng/dL with an estimated Tmax of 120 ± 26 minutes. No differences between study arms were observed in heart rate, blood pressure, hemodynamics parameters, energy expenditure, and in echocardiogram parameters. Conclusions: The absence of measurable rapid effects on the cardiovascular system following a high dose of liothyronine supports the rationale to perform long-term studies to assess its safety and effectiveness in patients affected by hypothyroidism.

Interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra and heart failure following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from a pooled analysis of the VCUART clinical trials.

AIMS: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with an intense acute inflammatory response and an increased risk of death and heart failure (HF). In this study, we sought to evaluate the effect of anakinra, a recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, on the incidence of HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a pooled analysis of three early phase randomized clinical trials. The endpoints included the composite of all-cause death and new-onset HF, and the composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for HF at 1-year follow-up. Safety events, including injection site reaction and serious infections, were also recorded. We analysed 139 patients with STEMI from three separate trials: VCUART (N = 10), VCUART2 (N = 30), and VCUART3 (N = 99). Of these, 84 (60%) patients were randomized to anakinra and 55 (40%) to placebo. Treatment with anakinra significantly reduced the incidence of all-cause death or new-onset HF (7 [8.2%] vs. 16 [29.1%], log-rank P = 0.002) and of all-cause death or HF hospitalization (0 [0] vs. 5 [9.1%], log-rank P = 0.007). Patients treated with anakinra had significantly higher injection site reactions (19 [22.6%] vs. 3 [5.5%], P = 0.016) without a significant difference in the incidence of serious infections (11 [13.1%] vs. 7 [12.7%], P = 0.435). Treatment with anakinra significantly reduced the area under the curve for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein between baseline and 14 days (75.48 [41.7-147.47] vs. 222.82 [117.22-399.28] mg day/L, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IL-1 blockade with anakinra for 14 days in patients with STEMI reduces the incidence of new-onset HF or hospitalization for HF at 1 year following STEMI.

Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Black or African American Versus Caucasian Patients With Heart Failure.

PURPOSE: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is a well-established assessment with important insight into prognosis and therapeutic efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF). Prior studies have identified several clinical differences between Black or African American (B-AA) and Caucasian patients with HF. Differences in key CPX responses between these two groups require further investigation. METHODS: Using a database consisting of subjects with symptomatic HF who had undergone CPX for inclusion in various prospective randomized clinical trials, we identified 198 (n = 94 [47%] B-AA; n = 105 [53%] Caucasian) patients with a qualifying baseline CPX. Significant univariate predictors of peak oxygen uptake (V˙o2peak) were included in a multivariate linear regression model. RESULTS: When compared with Caucasian patients, B-AA were younger (mean ± SD = 54.8 ± 10.0 vs 57.9 ± 9.6 yr, P = .03), had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) (median [IQR] = 4.9 [2.3, 8.8] vs 1.9 [0.6, 5.5] mg/L, P < .0001), lower hemoglobin (13.0 ± 1.8 vs 13.8 ± 1.6 g/dL, P = .003), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (40 [32, 51] vs 53 [43, 59]%, P < .00010). During CPX, B-AA patients also had lower V˙o2peak (14.6 ± 3.9 vs 17.6 ± 4.8 mL·kg-1·min-1, P < .0001). No differences were observed between B-AA and Caucasian in the minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (V˙e/V˙co2) slope (P = .14). The difference in V˙o2peak between B-AA and Caucasian was largely attenuated after adjusting for age, body mass index, CRP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, hemoglobin, LVEF, and peak HR (14.1: 95% CI, 13.2-14.9 vs 15.6: 95% CI, 14.4-16.8 mL·kg-1·min-1, P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: Directly measured V˙o2peak was significantly lower in B-AA than in Caucasians with HF. This is largely explained by differences in clinical characteristics, whereas no significant differences were observed in the V˙e/V˙co2 slope.

Preservation of Cardiac Reserve and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Acute De Novo Versus Acute on Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

There is limited understanding on the potential differences in the pathophysiology between de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and acute on chronic HFrEF. The aim of this study was to assess differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) parameters between de novo heart failure and acute on chronic HFrEF using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX). We retrospectively analyzed CPX data measured within 2 weeks of discharge following acute hospitalization for HFrEF. Data are reported as median and interquartile range or frequency and percentage (%). We included 102 patients: 32 (31%) women, 81 (79%) black, 57 (51 to 64) years of age, BMI of 34 (29 to 39) Kg/m2. Of these, 26 (25%) had de novo HFrEF and 76 (75%) had acute on chronic HFrEF. When compared with acute on chronic, patients with de novo HFrEF had a significantly higher peak oxygen consumption (VO2) (16.5 [12.2 to 19.4] vs 12.8 [10.1 to 15.3] ml·kg-1·min-1, p <0.001), %-predicted peak VO2 (58% [51 to 75] vs 49% [42 to 59]) p = 0.012), peak heart rate (134 [117 to 147] vs 117 [104 to 136] beats/min, p = 0.004), peak oxygen pulse (12.2 [10.5 to 15.5] vs 9.9 [8.0 to 13.1] ml/beat, p = 0.022) and circulatory power (2,823 [1,973 to 3,299] vs 1,902 [1,372 to 2,512] mm Hg·ml·kg-1·min-1, p = 0.002). No significant difference in resting left ventricular ejection fraction was found between groups. In conclusion, patients with de novo HFrEF have better CRF parameters than those with acute on chronic HFrEF. These differences are not explained by resting left ventricular systolic function but may be related to greater preservation in cardiac reserve during exercise in de novo HFrEF patients.

Clinical trial enrollment at a rural satellite hospital during COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Controlled clinical trials (CCTs) have traditionally been limited to urban academic clinical centers. Implementation of CCTs in rural setting is challenged by lack of resources, the inexperience of patient care team members in CCT conductance and workflow interruption, and global inexperience with remote data monitoring. METHODS: We report our experience during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in activating through remote monitoring a multicenter clinical trial (the Study of Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab Treatment for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in Participants with COVID-19-induced Pneumonia [CAN-COVID] trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04362813) at a rural satellite hospital, the VCU Health Community Memorial Hospital (VCU-CMH) in South Hill, VA, that is part of the larger VCU Health network, with the lead institution being VCU Health Medical College of Virginia Hospital (VCU-MCV), Richmond, VA. We used the local resources at the facility and remote guidance and oversight from the VCU-MCV resources using a closed-loop communication network. Investigational pharmacy, pathology, and nursing were essential to operate the work in coordination with the lead institution. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with COVID-19 were enrolled from May to August 2020, 35 (69%) at VCU-MCV, and 16 (31%) at VCU-CMH. Among the patients enrolled at VCU-CMH, 37.5% were female, 62.5% Black, and had a median age of 60 (interquartile range 56-68) years. CONCLUSION: Local decentralization of this trial in our experience gave rural patients access to a novel treatment and also accelerated enrollment and more diverse participants' representative of the target population.

A phase 1 clinical trial of SP16, a first-in-class anti-inflammatory LRP1 agonist, in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Endogenous serine protease inhibitors are associated with anti-inflammatory and pro-survival signaling mediated via Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) signaling. SP16 is a short polypeptide that mimics the LRP1 binding portion of alpha-1 antitrypsin. METHODS: A pilot phase I, first-in-man, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled safety study was conducted to evaluate a subcutaneous injection at three dose levels of SP16 (0.0125, 0.05, and 0.2 mg/kg [up to 12 mg]) or matching placebo in 3:1 ratio in healthy individuals. Safety monitoring included vital signs, laboratory examinations (including hematology, coagulation, platelet function, chemistry, myocardial toxicity) and electrocardiography (to measure effect on PR, QRS, and QTc). RESULTS: Treatment with SP16 was not associated with treatment related serious adverse events. SP16 was associated with mild-moderate pain at the time of injection that was significantly higher than placebo on a 0-10 pain scale (6.0+/-1.4 [0.2 mg/kg] versus 1.5+/-2.1 [placebo], P = 0.0088). No differences in vital signs, laboratory examinations and electrocardiography were found in those treated with SP16 versus placebo. CONCLUSION: A one-time treatment with SP16 for doses up to 0.2 mg/kg or 12 mg was safe in healthy volunteers.

Stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: Evidence from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of available randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to compare cardiovascular outcomes involving stenting techniques in coronary bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Although provisional stenting of the main branch and balloon angioplasty of the side branch is considered the standard approach, the use of two stents is often pursued with a wide variety of bifurcation stenting techniques available. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to December 2018. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis to estimate relative risks (RR) of death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST) among different two stent bifurcation techniques. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies, yielding data on 4,285 patients. Double Kissing (DK) Crush and Mini-crush were associated with significant reductions in MACE, TVR, and TLR when compared with the Provisional stenting (RR 0.31-0.55 [all p < .01] and RR 0.42-0.45 [all p < .02], respectively) and with the remaining bifurcation techniques (RR 0.44-0.55 [all p < .05] for DK Crush and RR 0.37-0.45 [all p < .05] for Mini-crush). In addition, Culotte and Crush were associated with an increased risk for ST compared to Provisional stenting (RR 3.25-4.27 [both p < .05]) and to DK crush (RR 3.02-3.99 [both p < .05]). CONCLUSIONS: DK crush and mini-crush were found to be associated with fewer events and complications compared to the other techniques reviewed, including the Provisional approach. Further, Culotte and Crush were associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis when compared to the Provisional approach.

Phase 1B, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Dose Escalation, Single-Center, Repeat Dose Safety and Pharmacodynamics Study of the Oral NLRP3 Inhibitor Dapansutrile in Subjects With NYHA II-III Systolic Heart Failure.

ABSTRACT: The NLRP3 inflammasome has been implicated in the development and progression of heart failure. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of an oral inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome, dapansutrile (OLT1177), in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This was a phase 1B, randomized, double-blind, dose escalation, single-center, repeat dose safety and pharmacodynamics study of dapansutrile in stable patients with HFrEF (New York Heart Association Class II-III). Subjects were randomized to treatment with dapansutrile for up to 14 days at a ratio of 4:1 into 1 of 3 sequential ascending dose cohorts (500, 1000, or 2000 mg) each including 10 patients. Subjects underwent clinical assessment, biomarker determination, transthoracic echocardiogram, and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline, day 14, and day 28 to ascertain changes in clinical status. Placebo cases (N = 2 per cohort) were used as a decoy to reduce bias and not for statistical comparisons. Thirty participants (20 men) were treated for 13 (12-14) days. No serious adverse events during the study were recorded. All clinical or laboratory parameters at day 14 compared with baseline suggested clinical stability without significant within-group differences in the dapansutrile-pooled group or the 3 dapansutrile cohorts. Improvements in left ventricular EF [from 31.5% (27.5-39) to 36.5% (27.5-45), P = 0.039] and in exercise time [from 570 (399.5-627) to 616 (446.5-688) seconds, P = 0.039] were seen in the dapansutrile 2000 mg cohort. Treatment with dapansutrile for 14 days was safe and well tolerated in patients with stable HFrEF.

Role for Anti-Cytokine Therapies in Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019.

The causative agent for coronavirus disease 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, appears exceptional in its virulence and immunopathology. In some patients, the resulting hyperinflammation resembles a cytokine release syndrome. Our knowledge of the immunopathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 is evolving and anti-cytokine therapies are under active investigation. This narrative review summarizes existing knowledge of the immune response to coronavirus infection and highlights the current and potential future roles of therapeutic strategies to combat the hyperinflammatory response of patients with coronavirus disease 2019. DATA SOURCES: Relevant and up-to-date literature, media reports, and author experiences were included from Medline, national newspapers, and public clinical trial databases. STUDY SELECTION: The authors selected studies for inclusion by consensus. DATA EXTRACTION: The authors reviewed each study and selected approrpriate data for inclusion through consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: Hyperinflammation, reminiscent of cytokine release syndromes such as macrophage activation syndrome and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, appears to drive outcomes among adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019. Cytokines, particularly interleukin-1 and interleukin-6, appear to contribute importantly to such systemic hyperinflammation. Ongoing clinical trials will determine the efficacy and safety of anti-cytokine therapies in coronavirus disease 2019. In the interim, anti-cytokine therapies may provide a treatment option for adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019 unresponsive to standard critical care management, including ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an overview of the current understanding of the immunopathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 in adults and proposes treatment considerations for anti-cytokine therapy use in adults with severe disease.

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Acute Pericarditis in a Large Urban Hospital in the United States of America.

BACKGROUND: Acute pericarditis is the most common presentation of pericardial diseases. Although generally benign, complications such as constrictive pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, and recurrence can occur. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the clinical factors associated with adverse outcomes in acute pericarditis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We used an informatics-based search engine to search for International Classification of Diseases codes related to pericardial disease between January 1, 2009 and November 14, 2018 and then extracted clinical information, including only patients meeting the European Society of Cardiology criteria for acute pericarditis. We then evaluated the predictive value of clinical characteristics for adverse outcomes (cardiac tamponade, constrictive pericarditis, failure of therapy, recurrences, or death). RESULTS: We identified 240 patients with a first episode of pericarditis (51 [34-62] years, 56% males and 50% white). Pericarditis was determined to be idiopathic in 126 (53%) cases and related to cardiac injury in 79 (33%). During a median follow-up time of 179 (20-450) days, 82 (34%) patients experienced at least one adverse outcome. Subacute presentation was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes. Patients with postcardiac injury pericarditis had a lower incidence in the composite of failure of treatment and recurrence (13% vs 26%; P = .022) compared with patients with idiopathic pericarditis. Troponin I measurements were obtained in 167 patients (70%). Elevated troponin I levels were associated with lower incidence of recurrences (4% vs 17%; P = .024) and of the composite outcome (13% vs 36%; P = .004). INTERPRETATION: Acute pericarditis is associated with at least one adverse outcome in 34% of patients. Subacute presentation and idiopathic etiology are associated with higher incidence of adverse outcomes, whereas elevated troponin I levels identify a group with reduced risk of recurrences.

Acute Effects of Interleukin-1 Blockade Using Anakinra in Patients With Acute Pericarditis.

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist (anakinra) has been shown to be effective in steroid-dependent recurrent pericarditis resistant to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine. We sought to evaluate the acute efficacy of anakinra given early in patients with acute pericarditis. We enrolled patients within 24 hours of presentation of a first or recurrent episode of acute pericarditis who were experiencing severe pain (≥6 in 11-point Likert scale), despite treatment with at least one dose of NSAIDs and of colchicine. The primary outcome was pain relief at 24 hours. Subcutaneous anakinra 100 mg was administered in all patients, whereas NSAIDs and colchicine were suspended for 24 hours. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured at baseline and 24 hours. Data are reported as median (interquartile range). We treated 5 patients (4 male and 1 female; 38 [31-54] years old). Anakinra significantly reduced pain from 6.0 (6.0-7.5) to 4.0 (2.5-4.0) at 6 hours (P = 0.012 vs. baseline) and to 2.0 (1.5-2.5) at 24 hours (P = 0.0025 vs. baseline). No patients required rescue pain medication. IL-6 levels were also significantly reduced from 95.3 (24.2-155.1) to 23.9 (4.5-71.9) pg/mL at 24 hours (P = 0.037). The reduction in pain intensity paralleled the reduction in IL-6 serum levels (R = +0.966, P = 0.007). No adverse events related to treatment occurred. The administration of anakinra given early in acute pericarditis treatment course rapidly and significantly improved chest pain from acute pericarditis. The improvement is correlated with a reduction in IL-6 levels.

Interleukin-1 Blockade Inhibits the Acute Inflammatory Response in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with an intense acute inflammatory response and risk of heart failure. We tested whether interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra significantly reduced the area under the curve for hsCRP (high sensitivity C-reactive protein) levels during the first 14 days in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (VCUART3 [Virginia Commonwealth University Anakinra Remodeling Trial 3]). Methods and Results We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial in 99 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in which patients were assigned to 2 weeks treatment with anakinra once daily (N=33), anakinra twice daily (N=31), or placebo (N=35). hsCRP area under the curve was significantly lower in patients receiving anakinra versus placebo (median, 67 [interquartile range, 39-120] versus 214 [interquartile range, 131-394] mg·day/L; P<0.001), without significant differences between the anakinra arms. No significant differences were found between anakinra and placebo groups in the interval changes in left ventricular end-systolic volume (median, 1.4 [interquartile range, -9.8 to 9.8] versus -3.9 [interquartile range, -15.4 to 1.4] mL; P=0.21) or left ventricular ejection fraction (median, 3.9% [interquartile range, -1.6% to 10.2%] versus 2.7% [interquartile range, -1.8% to 9.3%]; P=0.61) at 12 months. The incidence of death or new-onset heart failure or of death and hospitalization for heart failure was significantly lower with anakinra versus placebo (9.4% versus 25.7% [P=0.046] and 0% versus 11.4% [P=0.011], respectively), without difference between the anakinra arms. The incidence of serious infection was not different between anakinra and placebo groups (14% versus 14%; P=0.98). Injection site reactions occurred more frequently in patients receiving anakinra (22%) versus placebo (3%; P=0.016). Conclusions In patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, interleukin-1 blockade with anakinra significantly reduces the systemic inflammatory response compared with placebo. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01950299.

Management of Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Pericarditis refers to the inflammation of the pericardial layers, resulting from a variety of stimuli triggering a stereotyped immune response, and characterized by chest pain associated often with peculiar electrocardiographic changes and, at times, accompanied by pericardial effusion. Acute pericarditis is generally self-limited and not life-threatening; yet, it may cause significant short-term disability, be complicated by either a large pericardial effusion or tamponade, and carry a significant risk of recurrence. The mainstay of treatment of pericarditis is represented by anti-inflammatory drugs. Anti-inflammatory treatments vary, however, in both effectiveness and side-effect profile. The objective of this review is to summarize the up-to-date management of acute and recurrent pericarditis.