Creating a Telemedicine Network of Specialists in Maternal-Fetal Medicine: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Even before coronavirus disease 2019, integrating telemedicine into routine health care has become increasingly attractive. Evidence regarding the benefits of telemedicine in prenatal care is still inconclusive. As one of the largest sectors of preventive medicine with a relative paucity of specialists in maternal-fetal medicine (MFM), the implementation of telemedicine solutions into prenatal care is promising. Our objective aimed at establishing a telemedicine network of specialists in MFM for interprofessional exchange regarding high-risk pregnancies. Furthermore, the aims were to evaluate the providers' attitude toward the telemedicine solutions and to quantify the number of inpatient appointments that were avoided through interprofessional video consultations. Methods: This prospective trial was part of a larger telemedicine project funded by the European Regional Development Fund. MFM experts were brought together using the ELVI software. A questionnaire was designed for the evaluation of video consultations. The responses were analyzed by the exact McNemar-Bowker test to compare planned procedures before and after video consultation. Results: An interprofessional network of specialists in prenatal ultrasound was established with a total of 140 evaluations for statistical analysis. Interprofessional video communication was viewed favorably by providers. Overall, 47% (33/70) of the scheduled visits were avoided after video consultation. The providers' tendency to refrain from sending their patients to the University Hospital Münster was statistically noticeable (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Interprofessional exchange through video consultation holds great potential in the context of prenatal care. More prospective research is needed to clearly establish the most beneficial standard of care for both patients and providers. Clinical trial registration number: 2019-683-f-S.

Satisfaction with and Feasibility of Prenatal Counseling via Telemedicine: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Telemedicine has become increasingly important over the past decade. With the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic, demands for remote health care solutions have seen an unprecedented rise. However, many questions regarding the feasibility and benefits of telemedicine remain. The aim of our study was to evaluate both the technical feasibility and patient satisfaction with video consultations in a tertiary center for obstetric care. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center trial was part of the larger open Video Service project on telemedicine at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the University of Münster. Patients requiring prenatal or prepregnancy counseling were included. A questionnaire was designed for the evaluation of patient satisfaction and filled in by both patient and health care provider at the end of the video consultation. Results: Of 80 eligible cases, 75 video consultations were carried out and data from the questionnaire were collected. Overall patient satisfaction was high (95%, 71/75) although technical problems occurred in 37% (29/75) of the appointments. Health care providers' satisfaction was equally high and in 88% (66/75) of cases, remote consultations avoided an in-house visit without effect on health care quality. Conclusions: Remote consultations are feasible and yield high satisfaction rates even in a medical field as sensitive as perinatal medicine. Further research is necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness and effects on perinatal outcome. Health care systems should be offered clear guidance on medicolegal issues and funding of remote consultations to integrate telemedicine into routine health care.

Medical Emergency Datasets Can Improve the Comprehensiveness of Handover Information: A Simulation Study.

Background: Access to patients' medical histories can be of vital importance to ensure proper treatment in an emergency. Germany is planning to introduce a medical emergency dataset (MED), accessible through an electronic health card, and comprising important patient information, such as diagnoses, medications, and allergies. Introduction: This article evaluates the effect of MEDs on the comprehensiveness of a physician's documentation and handover process to the emergency department of a hospital. Materials and Methods: In 2 randomized, crossover simulation studies, 72 emergency physicians participated in 2 emergency scenarios, either with or without access to an MED. Subsequently, they had to document the key information (pre-existing conditions, medications, and allergies) and hand it over to a fictional hospital. The influence of the MED on the documentation of key information was analyzed using the two-sided Prescott's exact test. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for scenario were conducted. Results: The results show that in scenarios with an MED, documentation of key information in the handover process was more complete. In the first trial, 2 of 3 key items (pre-existing conditions/information and allergies) presented a statistically noticeable difference in scenarios with the MED. The second trial confirmed these results for all key items. Discussion: The findings indicate that the use of MEDs in emergency care could be beneficial since documentation and handover in scenarios with an MED were superior to current real-world practices. Conclusions: Access to more complete patient information through an MED could help to improve the patient's treatment.

A Secure Architecture to Provide a Medical Emergency Dataset for Patients in Germany and Abroad.

The ongoing fragmentation of medical care and mobility of patients severely restrains exchange of lifesaving information about patient's medical history in case of emergencies. Therefore, the objective of this work is to offer a secure technical solution to supply medical professionals with emergency-relevant information concerning the current patient via mobile accessibility. To achieve this goal, the official national emergency data set was extended by additional features to form a patient summary for emergencies, a software architecture was developed and data security and data protection issues were taken into account. The patient has sovereignty over his/her data and can therefore decide who has access to or can change his/her stored data, but the treating physician composes the validated dataset. Building upon the introduced concept, future activities are the development of user-interfaces for the software components of the different user groups as well as functioning prototypes for upcoming field tests.