Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 6(3): 346-52, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18328439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bleeding stomal varices are a common problem in patients with surgical stomas and portal hypertension, and remain difficult to diagnose and manage. METHODS: We identified all patients at our institution with bleeding stomal varices from 1989 to 2004. We surveyed all patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from 1997 to 2007 for bleeding anastomotic varices. Finally, we performed a systematic review of the literature focusing on diagnosis and treatment of bleeding stomal varices that included 74 English language studies of 234 patients. RESULTS: We identified 8 patients with bleeding stomal varices. Recognition of stomal varices typically was delayed, particularly when failing to examine the ostomy without the appliance. Stomal variceal bleeding was confirmed by Doppler ultrasound or angiographic imaging. Simple local therapy usually stopped bleeding, albeit temporarily. Sclerotherapy was effective, but at the expense of unacceptable stomal damage. Decompressive therapy was required for secondary prophylaxis, including transjugular intravascular transhepatic shunts (2 patients), surgical portosystemic shunts (2 patients), and liver transplantation (1 patient). No patient with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis developed anastomotic bleeding from varices. CONCLUSIONS: Primary prevention of bleeding stomal varices requires avoidance of creating enterocutaneous stomas in patients with portal hypertension. Careful inspection of the uncovered ostomy is essential for bleeding stomal varices diagnosis. Once identified, conservative measures will stop bleeding temporarily with definitive therapy required, including transjugular intravascular transhepatic shunts, surgical shunts, or liver transplantation.


Subject(s)
Colostomy/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hypertension, Portal/complications , Ileostomy/adverse effects , Varicose Veins/etiology , Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Hypertension, Portal/therapy , Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic/methods , Sclerotherapy/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Varicose Veins/diagnosis , Varicose Veins/therapy
3.
Semin Intervent Radiol ; 24(1): 63-7, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21326739

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous renal artery dissection (SRAD) is a relatively rare entity that has been described in several case reports and small series in the medical literature. The condition is best diagnosed with angiography, with renal ischemia or infarction a common complication. Conservative medical management, surgical intervention, and percutaneous intervention are all discussed in the current literature. However, there is no consensus on which treatment option provides the best clinical outcome. Percutaneous stent placement has only recently been considered as an option for treatment of SRAD. This case report reviews the course of an otherwise healthy patient with a solitary right kidney who had SRAD complicated by renal infarction and was treated by percutaneous renal artery stent placement. Subsequently, we discuss and review the literature on SRAD treatment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...