Using an Assumed Lung Mass Inaccurately Estimates the Lung Absorbed Dose in Patients Undergoing Hepatic 90Yttrium Radioembolization Therapy.

RATIONALE: Currently, the estimated absorbed radiation dose to the lung in 90Y radioembolization therapy is calculated using an assumed 1 kg lung mass for all patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether using a patient-specific lung mass measurement for each patient rather than a generic, assumed 1 kg lung mass would change the estimated lung absorbed dose. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 68 patients who had undergone 90Y radioembolization therapy at our institution. Individualized lung volumes were measured manually on CT scans for each patient, and these volumes were used to calculate personalized lung masses. The personalized lung masses were used to recalculate the estimated lung absorbed dose from the 90Y therapy, and this dose was compared to the estimated lung absorbed dose calculated using an assumed 1 kg lung mass. RESULTS: Patient-specific lung masses were significantly different from the generic 1 kg when compared individually for each patient (p < 0.0001). Median individualized lung mass was 0.71 (IQR: 0.59, 1.02) kg overall and was significantly different from the generic 1 kg lung mass for female patients [0.59 (0.50, 0.68) kg, (p < 0.0001)] but not for male patients [0.99 (0.71, 1.14) kg, (p = 0.24)]. Median estimated lung absorbed dose was 4.48 (2.38, 11.71) Gy using a patient-specific lung mass and 3.45 (1.81, 6.68) Gy when assuming a 1 kg lung mass for all patients. The estimated lung absorbed dose was significantly different using a patient-specific versus generic 1 kg lung mass when comparing the doses individually for each patient (p < 0.0001). The difference in the estimated lung absorbed dose between the patient-specific and generic 1 kg lung mass method was significant for female patients as a subgroup but not for male patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current method of assuming a 1 kg lung mass for all patients inaccurately estimates the lung absorbed dose in 90Y radioembolization therapy. Using patient-specific lung masses resulted in estimated lung absorbed doses that were significantly different from those calculated using an assumed 1 kg lung mass for all patients. A personalized dosimetry method that includes individualized lung masses is necessary and can warrant a 90Y dose reduction in some patients with lung masses smaller than 1 kg. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective Study.

PET imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-[18F]fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic acid in comparison with L-[S-methyl-11C]methionine.

PURPOSE: [11C]methionine ([11C]Met) was used for cancer imaging based on upregulated amino acid transport and protein synthesis in different tumor types. However, the short half-life of 11C decay limited further clinical development of [11C]Met. Synthetic amino acid analog anti-1-amino-3-[18F]fluoro-cyclobutyl-1-carboxylic acid ([18F]FCABC) was developed and FDA-approved for PET imaging of recurrent prostate cancer. This study investigated "repurposed" [18F]FACBC for PET imaging of primary liver cancer such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in comparison with [11C]Met. METHODS: [11C]Met was synthesized in the lab, and [18F]FACBC was purchased from a commercial outlet. A clinically relevant animal model of spontaneously developed HCC in the woodchucks was used for PET imaging. Bioinformatics analysis was performed for the expression of amino acid transporters responsible for radiotracer uptake and validated by PCR. Dynamic PET scans of [11C]Met and [18F]FACBC were acquired within 1 week. Standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated for regions of interest (ROIs) defined over HCC and a liver background region. H&E staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining were performed with harvested tissues post-imaging. RESULTS: Higher expression of ACST2 and LAT1 was found in HCC than in the surrounding liver tissues. PCR validated this differential expression. [11C]Met and [18F]FACBC displayed some differences in their uptake and retention in HCC. Both peaked in HCC with an SUV of 3.5 after 10 min post-injection. Met maintained a plateaued contrast uptake in HCC to that in the liver while [18F]FCABC declined in HCC and liver after peak uptake. The pathological assessment revealed the liver tumor as moderately differentiated similar to the human HCC and proliferative. CONCLUSION: Both [18F]FACBC and [11C]Met showed uptake in HCC through the use of a clinically relevant animal model of woodchuck HCC. The uptake and retention of [18F]FACBC and [11C]Met depend on their metabolism and also rely on the distribution of their principal amino acid transporters.

The impact of orthopedic metal artifact reduction software on interreader variability when delineating areas of interest in the head and neck.

PURPOSE: Metal artifacts during computed tomography (CT) hinder the evaluation of diagnostic images and impair the delineation of tumor volume in treatment planning. Several solutions are available to minimize these artifacts. Our objective was to determine the impact of one of those tools on the interreader variability when measuring head and neck structures in the presence of metal artifacts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eleven patients were retrospectively selected from an institutional review board-approved study based on the presence of metallic artifacts in the head and neck region. CT raw data were postprocessed using a metal artifact reduction tool. A single matching CT slice from the filtered backprojection and postprocessed data sets was selected in the region of the metal artifact. Areas of selected anatomical structures were measured by independent readers, including an anatomical structure selected from a CT slice with no metal artifact in each patient as control. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: Two extreme outliers were identified and the intraclass correlation coefficient was performed with and without them. The intraclass correlation on filtered backprojection, postprocessed, and control images was 0.903, 0.948, and 0.985 with outliers and 0.884, 0.971, and 0.989 without outliers, respectively, for all readers. On the other hand, the intraclass correlation on filtered backprojection, postprocessed, and control images for experienced readers was 0.904, 0.979, and 0.976 with outliers and 0.934, 0.975, and 0.990 without outliers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The interreader variability of areas measured in the presence of metal artifact was greatly decreased by the use of the metal artifact reduction tool and almost matched the variability observed in the absence of the metal artifact.

Image quality assessment of automatic three-segment MR attenuation correction vs. CT attenuation correction.

The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate the usefulness of Positron emission tomography/Magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) images in a clinical setting by assessing the image quality of Positron emission tomography (PET) images using a three-segment MR attenuation correction (MRAC) versus the standard CT attenuation correction (CTAC). We prospectively studied 48 patients who had their clinically scheduled FDG-PET/CT followed by an FDG-PET/MRI. Three nuclear radiologists evaluated the image quality of CTAC vs. MRAC using a Likert scale (five-point scale). A two-sided, paired t-test was performed for comparison purposes. The image quality was further assessed by categorizing it as acceptable (equal to 4 and 5 on the five-point Likert scale) or unacceptable (equal to 1, 2, and 3 on the five-point Likert scale) quality using the McNemar test. When assessing the image quality using the Likert scale, one reader observed a significant difference between CTAC and MRAC (p=0.0015), whereas the other readers did not observe a difference (p=0.8924 and p=0.1880, respectively). When performing the grouping analysis, no significant difference was found between CTAC vs. MRAC for any of the readers (p=0.6137 for reader 1, p=1 for reader 2, and p=0.8137 for reader 3). All three readers more often reported artifacts on the MRAC images than on the CTAC images. There was no clinically significant difference in quality between PET images generated on a PET/MRI system and those from a Positron emission tomography/Computed tomography (PET/CT) system. PET images using the automatic three-segmented MR attenuation method provided diagnostic image quality. However, future research regarding the image quality obtained using different MR attenuation based methods is warranted before PET/MRI can be used clinically.