Obesity prevention: recommended strategies and challenges.

Lifelong healthy weight maintenance is an important goal for all Americans to avoid the health problems associated with excessive body weight. In those who are overweight, even modest weight loss can reduce the risk of developing diseases associated with obesity. Federal health agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Department of Agriculture, have recognized the critical nature of the obesity epidemic and the importance of lifelong weight management. As a result, these agencies have published evidence-based dietary and exercise recommendations, as well as analyses of population-based efforts to achieve weight loss that specifically address strategies to maintain a healthy weight. Despite the availability of recommendations and increased public education efforts, however, obesity rates continue to climb. The rising prevalence of obesity in the United States suggests that current efforts to control weight have been inadequate. Large-scale prevention programs that involve interventions targeting individuals as well as the larger community, including initiatives spearheaded through workplaces and schools, are needed to control weight and reduce the risk of long-term health consequences.

Impact of lifestyle intervention on lost productivity and disability: improving control with activity and nutrition.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention (LI) in reducing work loss and disability days. METHODS: One year randomized controlled trial of health plan members (n = 147) with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Members were randomized to modest-cost LI or usual care (UC). Outcomes were group differences in cumulative days either missed at work or with disability using Mann-Whitney U-tests and Poisson regression models. RESULTS: LI reduced the risk of workdays lost by 64.3% (P

Effects of lifestyle intervention on health care costs: Improving Control with Activity and Nutrition (ICAN).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate program and health care costs of a lifestyle intervention in a high-risk obese population. DESIGN: Twelve-month randomized controlled trial comparing lifestyle case management to usual care. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Health plan members (n=147) with obesity (body mass index >/=27) and type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: Lifestyle case management entailed individual and group education, support, and referrals by registered dietitians. Those in the usual-care group received educational material. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical and pharmaceutical health care costs reimbursed by the participant's primary insurance company. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Total costs were modeled using the four-equation model using previous year cost as a predictor. RESULTS: Net cost of the intervention was $328 per person per year. After incorporating program costs, mean health plan costs were $3,586 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -$8,036, -$25, P<0.05) lower in case management compared to usual care. The difference was driven by group differences in medical (-$3,316, 95% CI: -$7,829 to -$320, P<0.05) but not pharmaceutical costs (-$239, 95% CI: -$870 to $280, not statistically significant), with fewer inpatient admissions and costs among case management compared with usual care (admission prevalence: 2.8% vs 22.5% respectively, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Addition of a modest-cost, registered dietitian-led lifestyle case-management intervention to usual medical care did not increase health care costs and suggested modest cost savings among obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Larger trials are needed to determine whether these results can be replicated in a broader population. The findings can be judiciously applied to support that the addition of a registered dietitian-led lifestyle case-management program to medical care does not increase health care costs.

Lifestyle intervention in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: impact of the patient's educational background.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether people with different educational backgrounds respond differently to a lifestyle intervention program for obese patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study consisted of a 12-month randomized controlled trial of 147 health plan members with type 2 diabetes who were overweight or obese (BMI > or = 27 kg/m(2)). Participants were randomized to lifestyle case management or usual care. Case management (CM) involved group and individual education, support, and referral by registered dietitians. Usual care (UC) participants received educational material. Both groups received ongoing primary care. A post hoc analysis was performed, evaluating the impact of education level on intervention group differences with respect to change in weight and waist circumference. RESULTS: There was a significant education by group interaction for both changes in weight (p = 0.02) and waist circumference (p = 0.01) during the study period. Contrary to expectations, CM participants with less formal education had greater risk reductions compared with more educated participants. Models predicted that, by 12 months, those with less education in the UC group gained 1.71 kg more in weight and 3.67 cm more in waist circumference than those with greater education. However, by 12 months, those in the CM group with less education lost a model-predicted 3.30 kg more in weight and 4.95 cm more in waist circumference than those with more formal education. DISCUSSION: People with varied educational backgrounds may respond differently to a lifestyle intervention for weight management and diabetes control.

Translating lifestyle intervention to practice in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: Improving Control with Activity and Nutrition (ICAN) study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a lifestyle intervention program that can be readily translated into clinical practice for obese patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study consisted of a 12-month randomized controlled trial of 147 health plan members with type 2 diabetes and obesity (BMI >or=27 kg/m(2)). Participants were randomized to lifestyle case management or usual care. Case management entailed individual and group education, support, and referral by registered dietitians; intervention cost was US dollars 350 per person. Individuals treated with usual care received educational material. Both groups received ongoing primary care. Outcomes were difference between groups for change in weight (kilograms), waist circumference (centimeters), HbA(1c), fasting lipid levels, use of prescription medications, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Case management resulted in greater weight loss (P < 0.001), reduced waist circumference (P < 0.001), reduced HbA(1c) level (P = 0.02), less use of prescription medications (P = 0.03), and improved health-related quality of life (P < 0.001) compared with usual care. The 12-month group difference in weight loss and waist circumference was 3.0 kg (95% CI -5.4 to -0.6) and -4.2 cm (-6.8 to -1.6). HbA(1c) differences were greatest at 4 months (-0.59%, P = 0.006) but not significant by 12 months (-0.19%, P = 0.45). Participants in the case management group lowered their use of medications, primarily diabetes medications, by 0.8 medications per day more than participants treated with usual care (P = 0.03). In seven of nine quality-of-life domains, the case management group improved compared with usual care (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-cost dietitian-led lifestyle case management may improve diverse health indicators among obese patients with type 2 diabetes.