Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the management of primary and recurrent chordomas: a retrospective long-term follow-up study.

Background: Chordomas have a high risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy (RT) is required as adjuvant therapy after resection. Sufficient radiation doses for local control (LC) can be achieved using either particle therapy, if this technology is available and feasible, or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Materials and methods: 57 patients (age, 11.8-81.6 years) with chordomas of the skull base, spine and pelvis who received photon radiotherapy between 1995 and 2017 were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated at the time of initial diagnosis (68.4%) or during recurrence (31.6%). 44 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and 13 received definitive radiotherapy. The median total dose to the physical target volume was 70 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) (range: 54.7-82.5) in 22-36 fractions. Results: LC was 76.4%, 58.4%, 46.7% and 39.9% and overall survival (OS) was 98.3%, 89%, 76.9% and 47.9% after 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 6.5 years (range, 0.5-24.3 years). Age, dose and treatment concept (post-operative or definitive) were significant prognostic factors for OS. Primary treatment, macroscopic tumour at RT and size of the irradiated volume were statistically significant prognostic factors for LC. Conclusion: Photon treatment is a safe and effective treatment for chordomas if no particle therapy is available. The best results can be achieved against primary tumours if the application of curative doses is possible due to organs at risk in direct proximity. We recommend high-dose radiotherapy, regardless of the resection status, as part of the initial treatment of chordoma, using the high conformal radiation technique if particle therapy is not feasible.

Survival and prognostic factors in patients with stable and unstable spinal bone metastases from solid tumors: a retrospective analysis of 915 cases.

BACKGROUND: Adequate prediction of survival plays an important role in treatment decisions for patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM). Several prognostic factors are already used in daily clinical practice, but factors related to stability of SBM are still unknown. Therefore, we designed this study to identify these prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 915 patients from solid tumors with commonly metastased into the bone treated at our department between January 2000 and January 2012. Lung cancer (NSCLC), breast and renal cancer listed in Table 1 are the most common solid tumors with bone metastasis in this study. Prostate carcinoma was excluded due to osteoblastic SBM with no influence for stability. We calculated overall survival (OS) and bone survival (BS; time between first diagnosis of bone metastases until death) with the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed prognostic factors for BS with the log-rank test and a Cox regression model separately for patients with stable and unstable SBM. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9.3 months. OS after 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years was 81, 62, 42, and 25 % in patients with stable SBM and 78, 57, 38, and 22 % in patients with unstable SBM (p = 0.851). BS was 57, 38, 22, and 5 % in the group of stable SBM after 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years. For patients with unstable SBM BS after 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years was 59, 39, 19, and 8 % (p = 0.755). In multivariate analysis we found male gender (HR = 1.27 [95 % CI 1.01-1.60], p = 0.04), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80 % (HR = 1.27 [95%CI 1.04-1.55], p = 0.02) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; HR = 2.77 [95%CI 1.99-3.86], p < 0.0001) to be independent prognostic factors for shortened survival in patients with stable SBM. Independent prognostic factors for unstable SBM were age per year (HR = 1.01 [95 % CI 1.0-1.02], p = 0.025), multiple SBM (HR = 1.35 [95 % CI 1.1-1.65], p = 0.003), and NSCLC (HR = 2.0 [95 % CI 1.43-2.80], p < 0.0001). Additionally, not wearing an orthopedic corset (HR = 0.77 [95 % CI 0.62-0.96], p = 0.02) was associated with prolonged BS in patients with unstable SBM and in both groups BS was significantly longer in patients without liver metastases (stable SBM: HR = 0.72 [95 % CI 0.56-0.92], p = 0.008; unstable SBM: HR = 0.71 [95 % CI 0.54-0.92], p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Survival was equal for patients with stable and unstable SBM. However, prognostic factors differed in both groups and stability should therefore be considered in treatment decision-making.

In vivo activity and pharmacokinetics of nemorosone on pancreatic cancer xenografts.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading cancer-related causes of death in the western world with an urgent need for new treatment strategies. Recently, hyperforin and nemorosone have been described as promising anti-cancer lead compounds. While hyperforin has been thoroughly investigated in vitro and in vivo, in vivo data for nemorosone are still missing. Thus, we investigated the growth-inhibitory potential of nemorosone on pancreatic cancer xenografts in NMRI nu/nu mice and determined basic pharmacokinetic parameters. Xenograft tumors were treated with nemorosone and gemcitabine, the current standard of care. Tumor sections were subjected to H&E as well as caspase 3 and Ki-67 staining. Nemorosone plasma kinetics were determined by HPLC and mass spectrometry. Induction of CYP3A4 and other metabolizing enzymes by nemorosone and hyperforin was tested on primary hepatocytes using qRT-PCR. At a dose of 50 mg/kg nemorosone per day, a significant growth-inhibitory effect was observed in pancreatic cancer xenografts. The compound was well tolerated and rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream with a half-life of approximately 30 min. Different metabolites were detected, possibly resembling CYP3A4-independent oxidation products. It is concluded that nemorosone is a potential anti-cancer lead compound with good bioavailability, little side-effects and promising growth-inhibitory effects, thus representing a valuable compound for a combination therapy approach.