Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
2.
Updates Surg ; 75(3): 523-530, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36309940

ABSTRACT

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is common in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The effect of DGE on mortality is less clear. We sought to identify predictors of mortality in patients undergoing PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma hypothesizing DGE to independently increase risk of 30-day mortality. The ACS-NSQIP targeted pancreatectomy database (2014-2017) was queried for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing PD. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Separate sensitivity analyses were performed adjusting for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grades A-C. Out of 8011 patients undergoing PD, 1246 had DGE (15.6%). About 8.5% of patients with DGE had no oral intake by postoperative day-14. The DGE group had a longer median operative duration (373 vs. 362 min, p = 0.019), and a longer hospital length of stay (16.5 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiation, open versus laparoscopic approach, vascular resection, deep surgical space infection (DSSI), postoperative percutaneous drain placement, and development of a POPF, DGE was associated with an increased risk for 30-day mortality (OR 3.25, 2.16-4.88, p < 0.001). On sub-analysis, grades A and B POPF were not associated with risk of mortality while grade C POPF was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR 5.64, 2.24-14.17, p < 0.001). The rate of DGE in patients undergoing PD in this large database was over 15%. DGE is associated with greater than three times the increased associated risk of mortality, even when controlling for POPF, DSSI, and other known predictors of mortality.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastroparesis , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy , Gastroparesis/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatic Fistula/epidemiology , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , Gastric Emptying , Pancreatic Neoplasms
3.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 23(1): 22-28, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494909

ABSTRACT

Background: Routine intra-operative abdominal drain placement (IADP) is not beneficial for uncomplicated cholecystectomies though outcomes in gallbladder cancer surgery is unclear. This retrospective study hypothesized that patients with IADP (+IADP) for gallbladder cancer surgery have a higher risk of post-operative infectious complications (PIC) compared with patients without IADP (-IADP). Patients and Methods: The 2014-2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for +IADP and -IADP patients who had gallbladder cancer surgery. Post-operative infectious complications were defined as septic shock, organ/space infection (OSI), or percutaneous drainage. Multivariable analyses were performed to analyze the associated risk of PIC. Results: Of 385 patients, 237 (61.6%) were +IADP. The +IADP patients had higher rates of post-operative bile leak, OSI, re-admission, and increased length of stay (p < 0.05). The +IADP patients were not associated with increased risk of PIC (p > 0.05). Bile leak (odds ratio [OR], 10.61; p < 0.001), peri-operative blood transfusion (OR, 3.77; p = 0.003), biliary reconstruction (OR, 2.88; p = 0.018), and pre-operative biliary stent placement (OR, 3.02; p = 0.018) were the strongest associated risk factors of PIC. Patients with drains in place at or longer than 30 days post-operatively had an increased associated risk compared with patients who did not (OR, 6.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.16-21.86; p < 0.001). Conclusions: More than 60% of gallbladder cancer surgeries included IADP and was not associated with an increased risk of PIC. Intra-operative abdominal drain placement was not associated with an increased risk of PIC, unless drains were left in place for 30 days or longer. Increased risk of PIC was associated with bile leak, peri-operative blood transfusion, pre-operative biliary stent placement, and biliary reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Gallbladder Neoplasms , Drainage , Gallbladder Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Stents
4.
Surg Technol Int ; 39: 85-90, 2021 07 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34324699

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is early evidence that indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has the ability to detect metastatic and primary malignancies in the liver that are too small to be identified by other methods. However, the rate of false positives and false negatives remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single institution prospective single-arm study. Patients with suspected hepatic or pancreatic malignancies were intravenously injected with ICG one to three days prior to their scheduled surgical therapy. At the beginning of the procedure, the liver was assessed with fluorescence imaging and all identified lesions were biopsied and evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled from April 2015 through February 2016. Fifteen patients with confirmed malignancy had adequate fluorescence imaging evaluation of the liver; 10 with pancreatic primary malignancies and five with hepatic primaries. Fluorescence imaging was the only modality that identified nine concerning hepatic lesions, all of which were benign on pathology examination. Out of 11 malignant hepatic masses, six were visible on fluorescence imaging. Out of nine benign hepatic lesions, five were visible. No side effects or complications of the fluorescence imaging were encountered. The sensitivity for ICG fluorescence was 45.5%, the specificity 21.2%, the positive predictive value 25%, and the negative predictive value 40%. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative hepatic assessment with ICG fluorescence imaging to identify malignancy in the liver is feasible and safe. However, in this study the significant number of false positives limit the utility of the technique. Our preliminary data do not support its routine use for detection of malignancies in the liver.


Subject(s)
Liver Neoplasms , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Indocyanine Green , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Optical Imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prospective Studies
5.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 54(1): 36-41, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31570064

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Although traumatic injuries to the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), portal vein (PV), and hepatic vein (HV) are rare, their impact is significant. Small single center reports estimate mortality rates ranging from 29% to 100%. Our aim is to elucidate the incidence and outcomes associated with each injury due to unique anatomic positioning and varied tolerance of ligation. We hypothesize that SMV injury is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to HV and PV injury in adult trauma patients. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2010-2016) was queried for patients with injury to either the SMV, PV, or HV. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for analysis. RESULTS: From 1,403,466 patients, 966 (0.07%) had a single major hepatoportal venous injury with 460 (47.6%) involving the SMV, 281 (29.1%) involving the PV, and 225 (23.3%) involving the HV. There was no difference in the percentage of patients undergoing repair or ligation between SMV, PV, and HV injuries (P > .05). Compared to those with PV and HV injuries, patients with SMV injury had a higher rate of concurrent bowel resection (38.5% vs 12.1% vs 7.6%, P < .001) and lower mortality (33.3% vs 45.9% vs 49.3%, P < .01). After controlling for covariates, traumatic SMV injury increased the risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-2.54, P = .05) in adult trauma patients; however, this was less than PV injury (OR = 2.77, CI = 1.56-4.93, P = .001) and HV injury (OR = 2.70, CI = 1.46-4.99, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Traumatic SMV injury had a lower rate of mortality compared to injuries of the HV and PV. SMV injury increased the risk of mortality by 60% in adult trauma patients, whereas PV and HV injuries nearly tripled the risk of mortality.


Subject(s)
Hepatic Veins/injuries , Portal Vein/injuries , Vascular System Injuries/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Databases, Factual , Female , Hepatic Veins/diagnostic imaging , Hepatic Veins/surgery , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Portal Vein/diagnostic imaging , Portal Vein/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Vascular System Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Vascular System Injuries/mortality , Vascular System Injuries/surgery , Young Adult
6.
HPB (Oxford) ; 21(11): 1577-1584, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31040065

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Perioperative blood transfusion is common after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and may predispose patients to infectious complications. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between perioperative blood transfusion and the development of post-surgical infection after PD. METHODS: Patients who underwent PD from 2014 to 2015 were identified in the NSQIP pancreas-specific database. Logistic regression analysis was used to compute adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to identify an independent association between perioperative red blood cell transfusion (within 72 h of surgery) and the development of post-operative infection after 72 h. RESULTS: A total of 6869 patients underwent PD during this time period. Of these, 1372 (20.0%) patients received a perioperative blood transfusion. Patients receiving transfusion had a higher rate of post-operative infection (34.7% vs 26.5%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for significant covariates, perioperative transfusion was independently associated the subsequent development of any post-operative infection (aOR 1.41 [1.23-1.62], p < 0.001), including pneumonia (aOR 2.01 [1.48-2.74], p < 0.001), sepsis (aOR 1.62 [1.29-2.04], p < 0.001), and septic shock (aOR 1.92 [1.38-2.68], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a strong independent association between perioperative blood transfusion and the development of subsequent post-operative infection following PD.


Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
9.
Pancreas ; 46(7): 898-903, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28697130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Literature addressing the significance of lymph node positivity in the management of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) is conflicting. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients who underwent surgical resection of nonfunctional PNETs between 1998 and 2011. Clinical data and overall survival were analyzed using χ and Cox proportional hazards regression. Multiple imputation was used as a comparative analysis because of the high number of patients missing data on tumor grade. RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred thirty-five patients were identified. The overall incidence of lymph node metastasis was 51%. In the subset of patients with grade 1 tumors less than 1 cm, 24% had positive lymph nodes. Overall median survival for patients with negative lymph nodes was 11 years compared with 8 years for lymph node-positive patients (P < 0.001). On multivariate survival analysis, tumor grade, distant metastases, regional lymph node involvement, positive surgical margins, male sex, and older age were predictive of decreased overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node positivity was associated with decreased overall survival. The incidence of lymph node involvement in resected low-grade tumors less than 1 cm is higher than previously reported. Patients selected for resection of PNETs should be offered lymphadenectomy for staging.


Subject(s)
Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology
10.
Surg Innov ; 24(5): 492-498, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28643605

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A novel 3-dimensional (3D) guidance system was developed to aid accurate needle placement during ablation. METHODS: Five novices and 5 experienced hepatobiliary surgeons were recruited. Using an agar block with analog tumor, participants targeted under 4 conditions: in-line with the ultrasound plane using ultrasound, in-line using 3D guidance, 45° off-axis using ultrasound, and off-axis using 3D guidance. Time to target the tumor, number of withdrawals, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index were collected. Initial and final parameters for each of the conditions were compared using a within-subjects paired t test. RESULTS: A significant reduction was seen in the number of required withdrawals in all situations when using the 3D guidance (0.75 vs 3.65 in-line and 0.25 vs 3.6 for off-axis). Mental workload was significantly lower when using 3D guidance compared with ultrasound both for novices (29.85 vs 41.03) and experts (31.98 vs 44.57), P < .001 for both. The only difference in targeting time between first and last attempt was in the novice group during off-axis targeting using 3D guidance (115 vs 32.6 seconds, P = .03). CONCLUSION: Though 3D guidance appeared to decrease time to target, this was not statistically significant likely as a result of lack of power in our trial. Three-dimensional guidance did reduce the number of required withdrawals, potentially decreasing complications, as well as mental workload after proficiency was achieved. Furthermore, novices without experience in ultrasound were able to learn targeting with the 3D guidance system at a faster pace than targeting with ultrasound alone.


Subject(s)
Ablation Techniques/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Neoplasms , Surgeons/education , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , Learning Curve , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/surgery , Task Performance and Analysis
11.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(7): 2015-2022, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28299507

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Current literature addressing the treatment of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas is limited, particularly for patients with distant metastases. We aimed to define predictive indicators of survival in a large series of patients and assess the outcome of patients with distant metastases. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with SPNs of the pancreas between 1998 and 2011. Single predictor univariate analyses were performed on variables including demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgery outcomes, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis was then completed with backward elimination. RESULTS: Overall, 340 patients were identified: 82% were female, median age was 39 years, and 84% had no comorbidities. Patients undergoing any type of surgical resection experienced long-term survival (85% 8-year survival). Patients undergoing surgical resection (n = 296) had superior survival (hazard ratio [HR] 21 for no surgery, p < 0.0001), as did patients treated at academic centers and those with private insurance (HR 3.9, p = 0.009; HR 4.9, p = 0.007). Sex, age, tumor size, presence of lymph node metastases, positive surgical margins, and presence of distant metastases were not significant predictors of survival in multivariate analysis. Of 24 patients with distant metastases, seven were treated surgically and experienced long-term survival similar to that of patients without metastases treated surgically (HR 2, p = 0.48). CONCLUSION: SPNs of the pancreas are rare neoplasms with excellent overall survival; however, in a low number of patients they metastasize. Of the few patients with metastatic disease selected for resection, most experienced long-term survival.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary/secondary , Pancreatectomy/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Carcinoma, Papillary/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Metastasis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden
12.
HPB (Oxford) ; 19(6): 508-514, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fistula Risk Score (FRS) is a previously developed tool to assess the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: Prospectively collected databases from 4 university affiliated and non-affiliated HPB centers in United States and Canada were used. The influence of individual baseline characteristics, FRS and FRS group on CR-POPF was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. FRS calculator performance was assessed using a C-statistic. RESULTS: 444 patients were identified. Pathology, soft pancreas texture and pancreatic duct size were associated with CR-POPF rates (p < 0.001 for each); EBL was not (p = 0.067). The negligible risk group consisted of 50 (11.3%) patients, low risk of 118 (26.6%), moderate 234 (52.7%) and high risk group of 42 (9.5%) patients. The overall rate of CR-POPF was 20%. Of the patients in the negligible risk group, 2% developed CR-POPF, 13.6% of the low risk, 23.1% moderate and 42.9% in the high risk group (p < 0.001). Overall C-statistic was 0.719. CONCLUSION: FRS is robust and able to stratify the risk of developing CR-POPF following PD in diverse North American academic and non-academic institutions. The FRS should be used in research and to guide clinical management of patients post PD in these institutions.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Gastroenterology , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Canada , Chi-Square Distribution , Clinical Decision-Making , Databases, Factual , Gastroenterology/standards , Humans , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Pancreatic Fistula/diagnosis , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , United States
13.
J Immunother Cancer ; 4: 45, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27532020

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have shown synergy between radiation therapy and immunotherapy. However, in almost all preclinical models, radiation is delivered in single doses or short courses of high doses (hypofractionated radiation). By contrast in most clinical settings, radiation is delivered as standard small daily fractions of 1.8-2 Gy to achieve total doses of 50-54 Gy (fractionated radiation). We do not yet know the optimal dose and scheduling of radiation for combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. METHODS: To address this, we analyzed the effect of neoadjuvant standard fractionated and hypofractionated chemoradiation on immune cells in patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: We found that standard fractionated chemoradiation resulted in a significant and extended loss of lymphocytes that was not explained by a lack of homeostatic cytokines or response to cytokines. By contrast, treatment with hypofractionated radiation therapy avoided the loss of lymphocytes associated with conventional fractionation. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with reduced systemic loss of T cells. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01342224, April 21, 2011; NCT01903083, July 2, 2013.

14.
Am J Surg ; 211(5): 871-6, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27046794

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative risk stratification for postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy is needed. METHODS: Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula in 220 consecutive patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy at 2 major institutions were recorded retrospectively. Gland density was measured on noncontrast computed tomography scans (n = 101), and histologic scoring of fat infiltration and fibrosis was performed by a pathologist (n = 120). RESULTS: Forty-two patients (21%) developed a clinically significant pancreatic fistula within 90 days of surgery. Fat infiltration was significantly associated with gland density (P = .0013), but density did not predict pancreatic fistula (P = .5). Recursive partitioning resulted in a decision tree that predicted fistula in this cohort with a misclassification rate less than 15% using gland fibrosis (histology), density (HU), margin thickness (cm), and pathologic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study shows that no single perioperative factor reliably predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. A decision tree was constructed for risk stratification.


Subject(s)
Pancreas/pathology , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreas/surgery , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Fistula/physiopathology , Pancreatic Fistula/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Predictive Value of Tests , Preoperative Care/methods , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Adjustment , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
15.
HPB (Oxford) ; 18(1): 21-8, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26776847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Total pancreatectomy is infrequently performed for pancreatic cancer. Perceived operative mortality and questionable survival benefit deter many surgeons. Clinical outcomes, described in single-center series, remain largely unknown. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing total pancreatectomy (1998-2011). Univariate survival analyses were performed for 21 variables: demographic (8), tumor characteristics (5), surgery outcomes (6), and adjuvant therapy (2). The Log-rank test of differences in Kaplan-Meier survival curves was used for categorical variables. Variables with p < 0.05 were included in a multivariate analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze continuous variables and multivariate models. RESULTS: 2582 patients with staging and survival data made up the study population. 30-day mortality was 5.5%. Median overall survival was 15 months, with 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates of 60%, 22%, and 13%, respectively. Age, facility type, tumor size and grade, lymph node positivity, margin positivity, and adjuvant therapy significantly impacted survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Although total pancreatectomy is a reasonable option for selected patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, survival of the entire group is limited. Operative mortality is improved from prior reports. Greater survival benefits were seen in younger patients with smaller, node negative tumors resected with negative margins in academic research centers.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Academic Medical Centers , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/secondary , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Patient Selection , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden , United States
16.
HPB (Oxford) ; 18(1): 79-87, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26776855

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Routine lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is not routinely performed. We aim to define predictive indicators of survival in patients with positive lymph nodes. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients who underwent major hepatectomy for ICC between 1998 and 2011. Clinical and pathologic data were assessed using uni- and multi-variate analyses. A sub-analysis was performed on the 160 patients with positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: Of 849 patients with lymph node data, 57% had at least one lymph node examined. Median survival for lymph node negative patients was 37 months versus 15 months for lymph node positive patients. In lymph node positive patients, poorer survival was associated with not receiving chemotherapy (HR 1.83, p = 0.003), tumor size > 5 cm (p = 0.029), and older age (p < 0.0001). Lymph node positive patients age less than 45 had a median survival of 27 months. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival in patients with lymph node metastases from ICC is poor. Adjuvant therapy was associated with a longer survival in lymph node positive patients, although prospective data are needed. Routine lymphadenectomy should be strongly considered to provide prognostic information and guidance for adjuvant therapy.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Hepatectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Adult , Aged , Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality , Cholangiocarcinoma/secondary , Databases, Factual , Female , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Hepatectomy/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Lymph Node Excision/mortality , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
17.
HPB (Oxford) ; 17(5): 454-60, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25580988

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: With technological advances, questions arise regarding how to best fit newer treatment modalities, such as transarterial therapies, into the treatment algorithm for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Between 2005 and 2011, 128 patients initially treated with transarterial radioembolization or chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads were identified. The response was graded retrospectively. Toxicity was measured 1, 3, and 6 months after the first and last treatments. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (53%) were advanced stage. Twenty patients (16%) had an initial complete response, but with additional treatments, this was increased to 46 (36%). Patients with a complete response as their best response to treatment had a median survival [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 5.77 (2.58, upper limit not yet reached) years, significantly longer than those whose best response was a partial response, 1.22 (0.84, 2.06) years and those with stable disease as their best response, 0.34 (0.29, 0.67) years. Repeated treatments did not increase toxicity. DISCUSSION: This retrospective review of patients treated for intermediate and advanced stage HCC revealed a significant survival advantage in patients who achieved a complete response. These data support use of a multi-modality approach to intermediate and advanced stage HCC, combining liver-directed treatments as necessary to achieve a complete response.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
18.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am ; 24(1): 97-119, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25444471

ABSTRACT

A wide array of ablation technologies, in addition to the progressive sophistication of imaging technologies and percutaneous, laparoscopic, and open surgical techniques, have allowed us to expand treatment options for patients with liver tumors. In this article, technical considerations of chemical and thermal ablations and their application in hepatic oncology are reviewed.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/secondary
19.
Surg Innov ; 21(4): 419-26, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24201739

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Explorer Minimally Invasive Liver (MIL) system uses imaging to create a 3-dimensional model of the liver. Intraoperatively, the system displays the position of instruments relative to the virtual liver. A prospective clinical study compared it with intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) in laparoscopic liver ablations. METHODS: Patients undergoing ablations were accrued from 2 clinical sites. During the procedures, probes were positioned in the standard fashion using iUS. The position was synchronously recorded using the Explorer system. The distances from the probe tip to the tumor boundary and center were measured on the ultrasound image and in the corresponding virtual image captured by the Explorer system. RESULTS: Data were obtained on the placement of 47 ablation probes during 27 procedures. The absolute difference between iUS and the Explorer system for the probe tip to tumor boundary distance was 5.5 ± 5.6 mm, not a statistically significant difference. The absolute difference for probe tip to tumor center distance was 8.6 ± 7.0 mm, not statistically different from 5 mm. DISCUSSION: The initial clinical experience with the Explorer MIL system shows a strong correlation with iUS for the positioning of ablation probes. The Explorer MIL system is a promising tool to provide supplemental guidance information during laparoscopic liver ablation procedures.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/methods , Hepatectomy/instrumentation , Laparoscopy/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hepatectomy/methods , Humans , Intraoperative Care/methods , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome
20.
HPB (Oxford) ; 16(4): 350-6, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24112766

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (XRT) on postoperative outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database was queried for the period 2005-2010 to assess complication rates following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Two groups of patients were identified, comprising those who received neoadjuvant XRT and those who did not (control group). RESULTS: A total of 4416 patients were identified, including 200 in the XRT group and 4216 in the control group. There were differences in patient characteristics between the groups, including in age, hypertension and bilirubin level. Despite the fact that weight loss was more common, median operative time was longer (423 min versus 368 min; P < 0.001), and vascular reconstruction was more commonly required (20.5% versus 8.4%; P < 0.001) in the XRT group. In addition, the XRT group had a shorter median hospital stay than the control group (9 days versus 10 days; P = 0.005). Mortality (3.0% versus 2.7%; P = 0.818) and morbidity (40.5% versus 37.6%; P = 0.404) rates were not influenced by neoadjuvant XRT. Blood transfusion rates were increased in the XRT group (13.0% versus 7.4%; P = 0.003). Severe complications were influenced by age >70 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class >2, preoperative sepsis, dyspnoea, weight loss, impaired functional status, peripheral vascular disease and operative time of >8 h. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant XRT is not associated with an increase in complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Aged , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/mortality , Operative Time , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/mortality , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...