Language delay aggregates in toddler siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder.

BACKGROUND: Language delay is extremely common in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet it is unclear whether measurable variation in early language is associated with genetic liability for ASD. Assessment of language development in unaffected siblings of children with ASD can inform whether decreased early language ability aggregates with inherited risk for ASD and serves as an ASD endophenotype. METHODS: We implemented two approaches: (1) a meta-analysis of studies comparing language delay, a categorical indicator of language function, and language scores, a continuous metric, in unaffected toddlers at high and low familial risk for ASD, and (2) a parallel analysis of 350 unaffected 24-month-olds in the Infant Brain Imaging Study (IBIS), a prospective study of infants at high and low familial risk for ASD. An advantage of the former was its detection of group differences from pooled data across unique samples; an advantage of the latter was its sensitivity in quantifying early manifestations of language delay while accounting for covariates within a single large sample. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed that high-risk siblings without ASD (HR-noASD) were three to four times more likely to exhibit language delay versus low-risk siblings without ASD (LR-noASD) and had lower mean receptive and expressive language scores. Analyses of IBIS data corroborated that language delay, specifically receptive language delay, was more frequent in the HR-noASD (n = 235) versus LR-noASD group (n = 115). IBIS language scores were continuously and unimodally distributed, with a pathological shift towards decreased language function in HR-noASD siblings. The elevated inherited risk for ASD was associated with lower receptive and expressive language scores when controlling for sociodemographic factors. For receptive but not expressive language, the effect of risk group remained significant even when controlling for nonverbal cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Greater frequency of language delay and a lower distribution of language scores in high-risk, unaffected toddler-aged siblings support decreased early language ability as an endophenotype for ASD, with a more pronounced effect for receptive versus expressive language. Further characterization of language development is warranted to refine genetic investigations of ASD and to elucidate factors influencing the progression of core autistic traits and related symptoms.

Hexaaminobenzene derivatives: synthesis and unusual oxidation behavior.

The syntheses and the electrochemical behavior of the monomeric peralkylated hexaamino(1,3)metacyclophane 4, the dimeric dodecaamino(1,3)cyclophane 5a, and the dodecaamino(1,3,5)cyclophane 6 are described. Electrochemical measurements show that the hexaaminobenzene units in 4 and 5a undergo an unusually slow two-electron transfer attributed to the deformation of the rings into bis-cyanine cations when oxidized to the respective dication. Further oxidations to tri-, tetra-, and hexacationic units occur at more positive potentials. In the dimeric structures, no interaction between the rings can be seen in the (1,3)cyclophane, but strong interaction for the (1,3,5)cyclophane is observed.

Eclipsed Isopropyl Conformations of Two Dimeric Hydrazines.

The X-ray structures of 4,10-di-tert-butyl-5,9-diisopropyl-4,5,9,10-tetraazatetracyclo[6.2.2.2(3,6)]tetradecane (s4iPr) and its 4,9-di-tert-butyl-5,10-diisopropyl isomer (a4iPr) are reported. Both compounds are in conformations having their in-N-alkyl groups (directed toward the central CH-CH bond of the molecule) anti to each other, as expected from previous work. The principal feature of interest is that one in-isopropyl group in each compound is in an eclipsed conformation, NN,C(alpha)Me twist angle -0.5(5) degrees for s4iPr and -6.4(4) degrees for a4iPr. Low energy (somewhat less) eclipsed in-isopropyl conformations are predicted by both molecular mechanics (MM2) and semiempirical quantum mechanical (AM1) calculations. The asymmetry of the potentially C(2) symmetric a4iPr because the two in-isopropyl groups are in different rotamers is apparently not a result of crystal packing forces, because a conformation with different isopropyl rotamers is the more stable one by at least 1.0 kcal/mol in solution, determined by (13)C-NMR spectroscopy. This result is not predicted by either calculation method. The "monomer", 2-tert-butyl-3-isopropyl-2,3-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (3), proves to be a poor model for the conformations of 4iPr.