Inequality in place-of-death among children: a Danish nationwide study.

To identify predictors for home death among children using socio-demographic factors and cause of death. It is a nationwide registry study. A cohort of children (1-17 years) who died between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2016. It was set in Denmark, Europe. Predictors for home death were assessed: age, gender, diagnosis, region of residence, urbanicity, household income and immigrant status. Of 938 deceased children included, causes of death were solid tumours (17.3%), haematological cancers (8.5%) and non-cancerous conditions (74.2%). A total of 25% died at home. Compared to the lowest quartile, the groups with higher household income did not have a higher probability of dying at home (adjusted odds ratio (adj-OR) 0.8 (95% CI 0.5-1.2/1.3)). Dying of haematological cancers (adj-OR 0.3 (95% CI 0.2-0.7)) and non-cancerous conditions (adj-OR 0.5 (95% CI 0.3-0.7)) was associated with lower odds for home death compared to dying of solid tumours. However, being an immigrant was negatively associated with home death (adj-OR 0.6 (95% CI 0.4-0.9)). Moreover, a tendency was also found that being older, male, living outside the capital and in more urban areas were notable in relation to home death, however, not statistically significant.Conclusions: The fact that household income was not associated with dying at home may be explained by the Danish tax-financed healthcare system. However, having haematological cancers, non-cancerous conditions or being an immigrant were associated with lower odds for home death. Cultural differences along with heterogeneous trajectories may partly explain these differences, which should be considered prospectively. What is Known: • Prior studies have shown disparities in place-of-death of terminally ill children with diagnosis, ethnicity and socio-economic position as key factors. • Danish healthcare is tax-financed and in principle access to healthcare is equal; however, disparities have been found in the intensity of treatment of terminally ill children. What is New: • In a tax-financed, equal-access healthcare system, children died just as frequently at home in families with low as high household income. • Disparities in home death were related to diagnosis and immigrant status.

Predictors for place of death among children:A systematic review and meta-analyses of recent literature.

Through a systematic review and meta-analyses, we aimed to determine predictors for place of death among children. We searched online databases for studies published between 2008 and 2019 comprising original quantitative data on predictors for place of death among children. Data regarding study design, population characteristics and results were extracted from each study. Meta-analyses were conducted using generic inverse variance method with random effects. Fourteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising data on 106,788 decedents. Proportions of home death varied between countries and regions from 7% to 45%. Lower age was associated with higher odds of hospital death in eight studies (meta-analysis was not possible). Children categorised as non-white were less likely to die at home compared to white (pooled OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.5-0.7) as were children of low socio-economic position versus high (pooled OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.6-0.9). Compared to patients with cancer, children with non-cancer diagnoses had lower odds of home death (pooled OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.5-0.5).Conclusion: Country and region of residence, older age of the child, high socio-economic position, 'white' ethnicity and cancer diagnoses appear to be independent predictors of home death among children. What is Known: • Home is often considered an indicator of quality in end-of-life care. • Most terminally ill children die in hospitals. What is New: • Through a systematic review and meta-analyses, this study examined predictors for place of death among children. • Country and region of residence, older age of the child, high socio-economic position, white ethnicity and having a cancer diagnosis appear to be independent predictors of home death among terminally ill children.

Has perinatal outcome improved after introduction of a guideline in favour of routine induction and increased surveillance prior to 42 weeks of gestation?: A cross-sectional population-based registry study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether new national guidelines of routine induction of labour and increased surveillance in low risk pregnancies at 41+2-5 weeks of gestation as an alternative to expectant management until 42+0 weeks of gestation has improved perinatal outcome. METHODS: A questionnaire-based study regarding local induction practices among all Danish delivery units and a cross-sectional population-based registry study based on data from the Danish Medical Birth Registry (DMBR) in the years 2009-2012. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were frequencies of induced labour and perinatal mortality; secondary outcomes were indicators of perinatal morbidity and instrumental delivery rates. RESULTS: The questionnaire data showed that 22 of the 24 Danish delivery units complied with the new guidelines in 2012. The study population retrieved from the DMBR included 36,845 low-risk pregnancies at or beyond 41+2 weeks of gestation. The number of labour inductions within the study population had doubled after implementation of the new guideline. The increased proportion of induced labour did not appear to influence perinatal morbidity or instrumental delivery rates. Perinatal mortality remained steady in the years 2009, 2010 and 2011 whereas a reduction of 60 % was seen in 2012. However, this change was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: This population-based study with a high reported adherence to the new national guideline found no changes in instrumental deliveries or perinatal outcomes after implementation of earlier routine induction of labour and increased surveillance in low risk pregnancies.