Resolution of Hydronephrosis and Pain to Predict Stone Passage for Patients With Acute Renal Colic.

OBJECTIVE: To study patients who presented to the Emergency Department with acute renal colic to determine if resolution of hydronephrosis and pain accurately predicts stone passage on follow-up CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial of patients diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) scan with a symptomatic ureteral stone < 9 mm in diameter. Participants were followed after randomization to evaluate for analgesic use and to assess stone passage and hydronephrosis on a repeat CT scan obtained at 29-36 days. RESULTS: Four-hundred-three patients were randomized in the original study and patients were included in this analysis if they did not have surgery for stone removal and had a CT scan and information on pain medication at follow-up (N = 220). Hydronephrosis was detected in 181 (82%) on initial CT. At follow-up CT, 43 (20%) participants had a persistent ureteral stone. Of these patients, 36 (84%) had no pain, 26 (60%) did not have hydronephrosis, and 23 (53%) had neither pain nor hydronephrosis. Resolution of hydronephrosis was associated with stone passage (RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.9, 11.0), while resolution of pain was not (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9, 1.4). CONCLUSION: In patients with urinary stone disease, stone passage is associated with resolution of hydronephrosis but not resolution of pain. In patients with persistent ureteral stones, neither pain nor hydronephrosis are consistently present. These findings have important implications on follow-up imaging of patients with urinary stone disease.

Analgesic and Opioid Use for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Ureteral Stones.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe and characterize the analgesic and opioid use for patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with renal colic due to ureteral stone. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective trial of ED patients diagnosed by CT scan as having a symptomatic ureteral stone <9 mm in diameter. Participants were contacted after randomization on days 2, 7, 15, 20, and 29 and reported opioid and nonopioid analgesic use and stone passage. CT scan was repeated on day 29 to 36 to confirm passage. Results: Of 403 participants, 314 (77.9%) took an analgesic after discharge and 199 (49.4%) took opioids. Opioids were more commonly used by younger patients (p = 0.04) and those with a family history of stones (p = 0.003). Stone size and tamsulosin use were not associated with analgesic utilization. Shorter time to passage and more distal stone location were associated with less analgesic and opioid use. For those who did not expel a stone, 55.0% took opioids at any time, and for those who did expel a stone, 31.9% took opioids before the stone was expelled and 15.7% took opioids at any time after the stone was expelled. Conclusions: Factors associated with increased use of analgesics in patients discharged from the ED include a longer time to stone passage, no spontaneous passage, and proximal position of the stone in the ureter. Some patients continued to use analgesics after the stone had passed, but most stopped using analgesics by day 29. The study has been registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00382265).

Accuracy of Patient Reported Stone Passage for Patients With Acute Renal Colic Treated in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To study patients who initially presented to the Emergency Department with acute renal colic to determine if patient-reported stone passage detects stone expulsion as accurately as follow-up computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multi-center prospective trial of patients diagnosed by a CT scan with a symptomatic ureteral stone <9 mm in diameter. Patient-reported stone passage, defined as capture or visualization of the stone, was compared to CT scan-confirmed passage performed 29-36 days after initial presentation. RESULTS: Four-hundred-three patients were randomized in the original study and 21 were excluded from this analysis because they were lost to follow-up or received ureteroscopic surgery. Of the 382 remaining evaluable patients, 237 (62.0%) underwent a follow-up CT scan. The mean (standard deviation) diameter of the symptomatic kidney stone was 3.8 mm (1.4). In those who reported stone passage, 93.8% (91/97) demonstrated passage of the symptomatic ureteral stone on follow-up CT. Of patients who did not report stone passage, 72.1% (101/140) demonstrated passage of their stone on follow-up CT. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who report capture or visualization of a ureteral stone, a follow-up CT scan may not be needed to verify stone passage. For patients who do not capture their stone or visualize stone passage, imaging should be considered to confirm passage.

The Dangers of Spear Tackling: A Case Report of a NEXUS-negative High School Football Player.

BACKGROUND: Although "spear tackling" is known to be a risk factor for cervical spine injury due to axial loading of the neck, and although this technique was officially banned from American football in 1976, football-associated cervical spine injuries continue to be reported. This case highlights the importance of recognizing high-risk mechanisms for cervical spine injury, and specifically the danger of spear tackling among football players at all levels. CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old male high school football player presented to the pediatric emergency department for a neck injury sustained after spear tackling during a football game. He had no neurologic symptoms and met the NEXUS criteria for omitting x-ray evaluation. However, the description of spear tackling as the mechanism of injury led to the ordering of cervical radiographs, which revealed a C5 fracture. The patient was ultimately taken to the operating room for internal fixation, with a final surgical diagnosis of a C5 teardrop fracture. On outpatient follow-up at 1 year, the patient has had no neurologic sequelae. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case serves as a reminder that all evaluations of trauma patients should begin with an attempt to determine, as precisely as possible, the mechanism that was in play at the time of injury. The reassurance provided by a normal physical examination may be misleading. Spear tackling is not an uncommonly encountered cause of injury in American football, despite the practice being prohibited since a rule change in 1976. Continued education and increased awareness of the association of axial load injury with spear tackling may make it possible to avoid missing a potentially devastating cervical spine injury.

Implementation of a Novel Conference Series on Clinical Practice Variations Provides an Opportunity for Constructive Discussion of Faculty Practice Patterns: Do as We Say? or Do as We Do?

BACKGROUND: Although evidence-based medicine (EBM) is routinely used to guide management in the emergency department, there is still considerable variation in clinical practice. Trainees may not fully appreciate the reasons for these clinical practice variations (CPVs) and may find it frustrating when they encounter them. We used areas of CPV among our faculty as the basis for resident educational sessions and assessed the perceived utility of these sessions. METHODS: Topics were identified when residents noticed significant variability among the faculty in their management of particular clinical presentations. Sessions were conducted by facilitator-led reviews of EBM guidelines, by faculty panel discussions of their management rationale where EBM guidelines are not available, or by pro-con debates. Residents were surveyed after the initial sessions to assess the utility of this series and changes in their understanding of CPV. RESULTS: There was a 72% response rate. The percentage of residents who were frustrated with CPV decreased from 64% to 35%; the percentage who felt that the presence of CPV enhanced their learning increased from 19% to 48%. Sixty-five percent felt that the educational series contributed to decreased frustration, 77% felt that the sessions helped them understand why CPV occurs, and 93% felt that they helped their overall learning. CONCLUSION: Explicit discussion and exploration of CPV in an educational setting can provide multiple benefits. Trainees may gain a better understanding of why CPV occurs and of the rationale behind practice variations. Faculty may benefit from analyzing CPV to determine whether these truly represent the "art of medicine."

Effect of Tamsulosin on Passage of Symptomatic Ureteral Stones: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Urinary stone disease is a common presentation in the emergency department, and α-adrenergic receptor blockers, such as tamsulosin, are commonly used to facilitate stone passage. Objective: To determine if tamsulosin promotes the passage of urinary stones within 28 days among emergency department patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial from 2008 to 2009 (first phase) and then from 2012 to 2016 (second phase). Participants were followed for 90 days. The first phase was conducted at a single US emergency department; the second phase was conducted at 6 US emergency departments. Adult patients were eligible to participate if they presented with a symptomatic urinary stone in the ureter less than 9 mm in diameter, as demonstrated on computed tomography. Interventions: Participants were randomized to treatment with either tamsulosin, 0.4 mg, or matching placebo daily for 28 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was stone passage based on visualization or capture by the study participant by day 28. Secondary outcomes included crossover to open-label tamsulosin, time to stone passage, return to work, use of analgesic medication, hospitalization, surgical intervention, and repeated emergency department visit for urinary stones. Results: The mean age of 512 participants randomized to tamsulosin or placebo was 40.6 years (range, 18-74 years), 139 (27.1%) were female, and 110 (22.8%) were nonwhite. The mean (SD) diameter of the urinary stones was 3.8 (1.4) mm. Four hundred ninety-seven patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. Stone passage rates were 50% in the tamsulosin group and 47% in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.05; 95.8% CI, 0.87-1.27; P = .60), a nonsignificant difference. None of the secondary outcomes were significantly different. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle, although patients lost to follow-up before stone passage were excluded from the analysis of final outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Tamsulosin did not significantly increase the stone passage rate compared with placebo. Our findings do not support the use of tamsulosin for symptomatic urinary stones smaller than 9 mm. Guidelines for medical expulsive therapy for urinary stones may need to be revised. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00382265.

Design and challenges of a randomized clinical trial of medical expulsive therapy (tamsulosin) for urolithiasis in the emergency department.

Urolithiasis or urinary stone disease has been estimated to affect about 1 in 11 Americans. Patients with urinary stone disease commonly present to the emergency department for management of their acute pain. In addition to providing analgesia, administration of drug (medical expulsive therapy) is often prescribed to assist passage of the urinary stone. In this methodology paper, we describe the design of a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial of the alpha-adrenergic blocker, tamsulosin, to evaluate its effectiveness as medical expulsive therapy. In addition, we describe the unique challenges of conducting a trial of this type within the setting of the emergency department.

A descriptive study of myoclonus associated with etomidate procedural sedation in the ED.

BACKGROUND: Myoclonus is a well-recognized side effect of etomidate when given in induction doses for rapid sequence intubation. Most of the data reported on myoclonus with emergency department (ED) sedation doses are reported as a secondary finding. STUDY OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to prospectively quantify the incidence and duration of myoclonus associated with the administration of etomidate in the lower doses given for procedural sedation in the ED. METHODS: This was a prospective descriptive study performed between September 2008 and September 2010 at an urban teaching hospital ED with approximately 50000 patient visits per year. Procedural sedation was performed at the discretion of the treating emergency physician, and adult patients receiving etomidate were eligible for enrollment. The occurrence and duration of myoclonus were observed and recorded. Any interference of myoclonus with the ability to complete the procedure was recorded, and adverse effects were identified. RESULTS: Thirty-four eligible subjects were enrolled, and 36 separate sedation procedures were performed. The mean initial etomidate dose was 0.13 mg/kg (range, 0.077-0.20), and the mean total etomidate dose was 0.15 mg/kg (range, 0.077-0.29). Myoclonus was noted in 26 (72%) of 36 sedations. Mean time to onset of myoclonus was 50 seconds (range, 15-146), and the mean duration was 93 seconds (range, 03-557). Myoclonus interfered with the procedure in only 1 (3%) of 36 attempted procedures, and no procedure was unsuccessful because of myoclonus. CONCLUSION: Myoclonus associated with sedation doses of etomidate was common but rarely interfered with the completion of a procedure.