Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Eur Urol ; 47(4): 511-7, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15774251

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients visiting office-based urologists in Germany because of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and to evaluate the impact of ED on quality of life (QoL) in these patients. METHODS: 500 office-based urologists in Germany were invited to evaluate 20 consecutive patients for erectile dysfunction, who presented because of BPH-related LUTS. Physicians provided information on demographic factors, duration and treatment history of BPH, severity of LUTS, ED risk factors, and assessed the patient for the clinical diagnosis of ED. Patients were asked to complete the German version of the IPSS to measure LUTS severity. ED-patients quantified erectile dysfunction and impact on quality of life with validated German questionnaires (Cologne assessment of male erectile dysfunction KEED, and Qol-Med). RESULTS: Office-based urologists were aware of ED in 37.3% of 8768 patients presenting for LUTS before the study, 14.7% of patients were treated for ED. After the study-related assessment, physicians diagnosed ED in 62.1% of these patients and planned treatment in 46.9%. Severity of LUTS and ED prevalence correlated significantly after age-stratification. The incidence of ED was increased in patients with established ED risk factors. Mean QoL-Med score (best QoL: 100, worst QoL: 0) was 53.8 in patients with ED and 50.1 in ED-patients considering treatment. CONCLUSION: ED is highly prevalent in LUTS patients visiting an office-based urologist and is accompanied by a profound impact on the quality of life. Apparently, even during an urological consultation many ED-patients are hesitant to actively ask for treatment. Sexual issues should become key considerations for physicians managing patients with LUTS, especially since effective and well established oral treatment for ED is available.


Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction/complications , Erectile Dysfunction/epidemiology , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Erectile Dysfunction/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Fortschr Med ; 113(26): 374-8, 1995 Sep 20.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7498858

ABSTRACT

AIM: To determine, in a multicenter study, whether the fixed combination of verapamil retard (240 mg) and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg) is capable of lowering blood pressure more effectively than either of the substances alone or placebo, while retaining good tolerability. METHOD: A total of 173 patients who, after a four-week run-in period had a diastolic blood pressure of at least 100 and not more than 115 mm Hg, were randomized to six weeks of monotherapy with one of the two substances, placebo or the fixed combination. RESULTS: Combination treatment proved superior to monotherapy with either substance in lowering the diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05). Also in terms of normalization (diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg) the combination was clearly superior (p < 0.05). During the study no side effects beyond those associated with the single substances, occurred.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Hydrochlorothiazide/administration & dosage , Hypertension/drug therapy , Verapamil/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Austria , Delayed-Action Preparations , Double-Blind Method , Female , Germany , Humans , Hydrochlorothiazide/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Verapamil/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...