Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Cancer ; 103(5): 701-7, 2010 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20648010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in prostate cancer detection is constrained by low sensitivity and specificity. Dysregulated expression of minichromosome maintenance (Mcm) 2-7 proteins is an early event in epithelial multistep carcinogenesis and thus MCM proteins represent powerful cancer diagnostic markers. In this study we investigate Mcm5 as a urinary biomarker for prostate cancer detection. METHODS: Urine was obtained from 88 men with prostate cancer and from two control groups negative for malignancy. A strictly normal cohort included 28 men with complete, normal investigations, no urinary calculi and serum PSA <2 ng ml(-1). An expanded control cohort comprised 331 men with a benign final diagnosis, regardless of PSA level. Urine was collected before and after prostate massage in the cancer patient cohort. An immunofluorometric assay was used to measure Mcm5 levels in urine sediments. RESULTS: The Mcm5 test detected prostate cancer with 82% sensitivity (confidence interval (CI)= 72-89%) and with a specificity ranging from 73 (CI=68-78%) to 93% (CI=76-99%). Prostate massage led to increased Mcm5 signals compared with pre-massage samples (median 3440 (interquartile range (IQR) 2280 to 5220) vs 2360 (IQR <1800 to 4360); P=0.009), and was associated with significantly increased diagnostic sensitivity (82 vs 60%; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary Mcm5 detection seems to be a simple, accurate and noninvasive method for identifying patients with prostate cancer. Large-scale prospective trials are now required to evaluate this test in diagnosis and screening.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle Proteins/urine , Prostatic Neoplasms/urine , Aged , Fluoroimmunoassay , Humans , Male , Massage , Pilot Projects , Prostate , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Br J Cancer ; 98(9): 1548-54, 2008 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18414413

ABSTRACT

Biliary brush cytology is the standard method of sampling a biliary stricture but has a low sensitivity for the detection of malignancy. We have previously shown that minichromosome maintenance (MCM) replication proteins (Mcm2-7) are markers of dysplasia and have utilised these novel biomarkers of growth for the diagnosis of cervical and bladder cancer. We aimed to determine if MCM proteins are dysregulated in malignant pancreaticobiliary disease and if levels in bile are a sensitive marker of malignancy. In 30 tissue specimens from patients with malignant/benign biliary strictures, we studied Mcm2 and -5 expression by immunohistochemistry. Bile samples were also collected prospectively at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography from 102 consecutive patients with biliary strictures of established (n=42) or indeterminate aetiology (n=60). Patients with indeterminate strictures also underwent brush cytology as part of standard practice. Bile sediment Mcm5 levels were analysed using an automated immunofluorometric assay. In benign biliary strictures, Mcm2 and -5 protein expression was confined to the basal epithelial proliferative compartment - in contrast to malignant strictures where expression was seen in all tissue layers. The percentage of nuclei positive for Mcm2 was higher in malignant tissue (median 76.5%, range 42-92%) than in benign tissue (median 5%, range 0-33%) (P<0.0005), with similar results for Mcm5. Minichromosome maintenance protein 5 levels in bile were significantly more sensitive than brush cytology (66 vs 20%; P=0.004) for the detection of malignancy in patients with an indeterminate stricture, with a comparable positive predictive value (97 vs 100%; P=ns). In this study, we demonstrate that Mcm5 in bile detected by a simple automated test is a more sensitive indicator of pancreaticobiliary malignancy than routine brush cytology.


Subject(s)
Bile/chemistry , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Cell Cycle Proteins/analysis , Nuclear Proteins/analysis , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/chemistry , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , DNA Replication , Female , Fluoroimmunoassay , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2 , Pancreatic Neoplasms/chemistry , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
EMBO J ; 19(18): 4986-96, 2000 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10990462

ABSTRACT

Locus control regions (LCRs) alleviate chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression. Incomplete LCRs partially lose this property when integrated in transcriptionally restrictive genomic regions such as centromeres. This frequently results in position effect variegation (PEV), i.e. the suppression of expression in a proportion of the cells. Here we show that this PEV is influenced by the heterochromatic protein SUV39H1 and by the Polycomb group proteins M33 and BMI-1. A concentration variation of these proteins modulates the proportion of cells expressing human globins in a locus-dependent manner. Similarly, the transcription factors Sp1 or erythroid Krüppel-like factor (EKLF) also influence PEV, characterized by a change in the number of expressing cells and the chromatin structure of the locus. However, in contrast to results obtained in a euchromatic locus, EKLF influences the expression of the gamma- more than the beta-globin genes, suggesting that the relief of silencing is caused by the binding of EKLF to the LCR and that genes at an LCR proximal position are more likely to be in an open chromatin state than genes at a distal position.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/metabolism , Globins/genetics , Suppression, Genetic , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic , Animals , Cell Line , Chromosome Mapping , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Deoxyribonuclease I/metabolism , Gene Silencing , Globins/biosynthesis , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors , Liver/embryology , Liver/metabolism , Methyltransferases/genetics , Methyltransferases/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 , Polycomb-Group Proteins , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , RNA/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Single-Strand Specific DNA and RNA Endonucleases/metabolism , Sp1 Transcription Factor/genetics , Sp1 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcriptional Activation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...