Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(11): e2344023, 2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37983030

ABSTRACT

Importance: Consumption of energy drinks has increased drastically in recent years, particularly among young people. It is unknown whether intake of energy drinks is associated with health during pregnancy. Objective: To examine associations of energy drink intake before and during pregnancy with risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included data from women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study 3 (NHS3) between June 1, 2010, and September 27, 2021, and the Growing Up Today Study (GUTS) who reported 1 or more singleton pregnancy from January 1, 2011, to June 1, 2019. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2021, to September 28, 2023. Exposure: Intake of energy drinks, assessed by food frequency questionnaire. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were self-reported APOs, including pregnancy loss, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or preterm birth, and a composite APO, defined as development of any of the APOs. Risk of APOs was compared between consumers and nonconsumers of energy drinks. Results: This study included 7304 pregnancies in 4736 participants with information on prepregnancy energy drink intake and 4559 pregnancies in 4559 participants with information on energy drink intake during pregnancy. There were 1691 GUTS participants (mean [SD] age, 25.7 [2.9] years) and 3045 NHS3 participants (mean [SD] age, 30.2 [4.1] years). At baseline, 230 GUTS participants (14%) and 283 NHS3 participants (9%) reported any intake of energy drinks. While no associations were found for pregnancy loss (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.11), preterm birth (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.71-1.61), gestational diabetes (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.58-1.35), preeclampsia (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.41-1.30), or the composite APO (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87-1.26), prepregnancy energy drink use was associated with a higher risk of gestational hypertension (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.12-2.29). A significant interaction was found between age and energy drink intake in relation to hypertensive disorders (P = .02 for interaction for gestational hypertension; P = .04 for interaction for any hypertensive disorders), with stronger associations for participants above the median age. No associations of energy drink intake during pregnancy with any of the APOs were found in NHS3 (eg, any APO: OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.41-1.79). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, energy drink intake before pregnancy was associated with an elevated risk of gestational hypertension. Given the low prevalence of energy drink intake and low consumption levels among users, the results should be interpreted cautiously.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Diabetes, Gestational , Energy Drinks , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Pre-Eclampsia , Premature Birth , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/etiology , Energy Drinks/adverse effects , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Pre-Eclampsia/etiology , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Prospective Studies
2.
Public Health Nutr ; 26(7): 1424-1435, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36214079

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Energy drinks are consumed for a variety of reasons, including to boost mental alertness and energy. We assessed associations between demographic factors and various high-risky behaviours with energy drink consumption as they may be linked to adverse health events. DESIGN: We conducted cross-sectional analysis including basic descriptive and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses to characterise demographic and behavioural factors (including diet quality, binge drinking and illicit drug use, among others obtained via questionnaires) in relation to energy drink consumption. SETTING: We used data from two large US-based cohorts. PARTICIPANTS: 46 390 participants from Nurses' Health Study 3 (NHS3, n 37 302; ages 16-31) and Growing Up Today Study (GUTS, n 9088, ages 20-55). RESULTS: Of the 46 390 participants, 13·2 % reported consuming ≥ 1 energy drink every month. Several risky behaviours were associated with energy drink use, including illegal drug use (pooled OR, pOR: 1·45, 95 % CI: 1·16, 1·81), marijuana use (pOR: 1·49, 95 % CI: 1·28, 1·73), smoking (pOR: 1·88. 95 % CI: 1·55, 2·29), tanning bed use (pOR: 2·31, 95 % CI: 1·96, 2·72) and binge drinking (pOR: 2·53, 95 % CI: 2·09, 3·07). Other factors, such as high BMI, e-cigarette use and poor diet quality were found to be significantly associated with higher energy drink consumption (P values < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that energy drink consumption and high-risk behaviours may be related, which could potentially serve as not only as a talking point for providers to address in outreach and communications with patients, but also a warning sign for medical and other health practitioners.


Subject(s)
Binge Drinking , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems , Energy Drinks , Humans , Energy Drinks/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Binge Drinking/epidemiology , Demography
3.
J Food Prot ; 85(5): 755-772, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35259246

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This multiagency report developed by the Interagency Collaboration for Genomics for Food and Feed Safety provides an overview of the use of and transition to whole genome sequencing (WGS) technology for detection and characterization of pathogens transmitted commonly by food and for identification of their sources. We describe foodborne pathogen analysis, investigation, and harmonization efforts among the following federal agencies: National Institutes of Health; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Agricultural Research Service, and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. We describe single nucleotide polymorphism, core-genome, and whole genome multilocus sequence typing data analysis methods as used in the PulseNet (CDC) and GenomeTrakr (FDA) networks, underscoring the complementary nature of the results for linking genetically related foodborne pathogens during outbreak investigations while allowing flexibility to meet the specific needs of Interagency Collaboration partners. We highlight how we apply WGS to pathogen characterization (virulence and antimicrobial resistance profiles) and source attribution efforts and increase transparency by making the sequences and other data publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. We also highlight the impact of current trends in the use of culture-independent diagnostic tests for human diagnostic testing on analytical approaches related to food safety and what is next for the use of WGS in the area of food safety.


Subject(s)
Foodborne Diseases , Animals , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Food Safety , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Genomics , United States , Whole Genome Sequencing
4.
Prev Med ; 153: 106824, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34600959

ABSTRACT

FDA's Menu Labeling Final Rule requires covered establishments provide calorie information on menus or menu boards, among other requirements. This study describes correlates of noticing and using menu calorie information in a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults before implementation of the Final Rule in May 2018. Data from the 2018 National Cancer Institute Health Information National Trends Survey was used to assess noticing menu calorie information, using menu calorie information to change menu ordering behavior, and knowledge of daily calorie needs. Regression analysis of weighted data tested associations between individual characteristics and noticing and using menu calorie information. Nearly half of adults (44%) reported noticing menu calorie information. Women, younger individuals, those who seek health information, individuals with a BMI ≥ 30, and those with higher education or higher income were more likely to report noticing menu calorie information. Among adults who reported noticing menu calorie information, three-quarters responded by ordering less (e.g., fewer calories), which equates to about one-third of the population. About 36% of women and 42% of men lacked calorie knowledge. Men with, versus without, calorie knowledge were twice as likely to report noticing menu calorie information (adjusted OR 2.23 95% CI 1.51, 3.29). Findings suggest behavioral response to menu calorie information varies and most individuals who notice the information respond by ordering less in ways that could reduce caloric intake. Future analyses could compare noticing and using menu calorie information before and after menu labeling implementation to assess the effect of policy on population behaviors.


Subject(s)
Food Labeling , Neoplasms , Adult , Energy Intake , Female , Humans , Male , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Restaurants , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(38): 1332-1336, 2021 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555002

ABSTRACT

Foodborne illnesses are a substantial and largely preventable public health problem; before 2020 the incidence of most infections transmitted commonly through food had not declined for many years. To evaluate progress toward prevention of foodborne illnesses in the United States, the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) of CDC's Emerging Infections Program monitors the incidence of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by eight pathogens transmitted commonly through food reported by 10 U.S. sites.* FoodNet is a collaboration among CDC, 10 state health departments, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS), and the Food and Drug Administration. This report summarizes preliminary 2020 data and describes changes in incidence with those during 2017-2019. During 2020, observed incidences of infections caused by enteric pathogens decreased 26% compared with 2017-2019; infections associated with international travel decreased markedly. The extent to which these reductions reflect actual decreases in illness or decreases in case detection is unknown. On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. After the declaration, state and local officials implemented stay-at-home orders, restaurant closures, school and child care center closures, and other public health interventions to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 (1). Federal travel restrictions were declared (1). These widespread interventions as well as other changes to daily life and hygiene behaviors, including increased handwashing, have likely changed exposures to foodborne pathogens. Other factors, such as changes in health care delivery, health care-seeking behaviors, and laboratory testing practices, might have decreased the detection of enteric infections. As the pandemic continues, surveillance of illness combined with data from other sources might help to elucidate the factors that led to the large changes in 2020; this understanding could lead to improved strategies to prevent illness. To reduce the incidence of these infections concerted efforts are needed, from farm to processing plant to restaurants and homes. Consumers can reduce their risk of foodborne illness by following safe food-handling and preparation recommendations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Food Microbiology/statistics & numerical data , Food Parasitology/statistics & numerical data , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Pandemics , Watchful Waiting , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/parasitology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , United States/epidemiology
6.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211002416, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33724074

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Obesity prevalence has reached an all-time high in the US, affecting >40% of the population. This study's objective was to evaluate associations between demographics and self-reported calorie knowledge and self-perceived confidence in calorie knowledge ("calorie confidence"). The relationships between body mass index (BMI) and calorie knowledge and confidence were also explored. METHODS: We analyzed data from participants (n = 2171) in the crosssectional, nationally representative 2019 FDA Food Safety and Nutrition Survey using logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and confidence intervals (95% CIs) for associations between BMI and calorie knowledge (correct/incorrect), calorie confidence (confident/not confident), and demographic characteristics, and the Wald chi square test to evaluate relationships between BMI and both calorie knowledge and confidence. RESULTS: Many of the same subgroups were more likely than others to report lack of calorie knowledge and lack of confidence in knowing the typical daily calorie intake needed to maintain a healthy weight [respective AORs (95% CIs): age (years), >60 vs 51-60, 1.7 (1.1-2.5), and 1.4 (1.0-2.0); sex, male vs female, 1.7 (1.3-2.3), and 1.7 (1.3-2.1); race/ethnicity, non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic white, 3.4 (2.1-5.5), and 2.4 (1.6-3.8); education, ≤high school vs college grad, 1.5 (1.0- 2.3), and 1.9 (1.3-2.7)]. BMI was significantly correlated with calorie confidence (P = .047), such that those reporting less confidence were more likely overweight or obese [underweight/healthy (BMI < 25): 29%, overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30): 34%, obese (BMI ≥ 30): 37%]. CONCLUSION: In certain demographic subgroups associations between calorie knowledge and confidence differed. Tailored education and outreach for these groups may help to address these disparities.


Subject(s)
Obesity , Overweight , Adult , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nutrition Surveys , Obesity/epidemiology
7.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(1): 214-222, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33350919

ABSTRACT

Foodborne illness source attribution is foundational to a risk-based food safety system. We describe a method for attributing US foodborne illnesses caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli O157, Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter to 17 food categories using statistical modeling of outbreak data. This method adjusts for epidemiologic factors associated with outbreak size, down-weights older outbreaks, and estimates credibility intervals. On the basis of 952 reported outbreaks and 32,802 illnesses during 1998-2012, we attribute 77% of foodborne Salmonella illnesses to 7 food categories (seeded vegetables, eggs, chicken, other produce, pork, beef, and fruits), 82% of E. coli O157 illnesses to beef and vegetable row crops, 81% of L. monocytogenes illnesses to fruits and dairy, and 74% of Campylobacter illnesses to dairy and chicken. However, because Campylobacter outbreaks probably overrepresent dairy as a source of nonoutbreak campylobacteriosis, we caution against using these Campylobacter attribution estimates without further adjustment.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections , Foodborne Diseases , Gastroenteritis , Listeria monocytogenes , Animals , Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Cattle , Disease Outbreaks , Food Microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
8.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0239099, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33259491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The association of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) with risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) has been inconsistent in previous studies. METHODS: We examined the associations of BMI and WC in relation to risk of GBS among 252,980 participants from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHS-II, and the Health Professional Follow-up Study (HPFS). BMI and WC were assessed by self-reported questionnaire, and GBS cases were self-reported. RESULTS: We documented 328 incident GBS cases during a total of 5,422,788 person years of follow-up. Compared to participants with BMI<25kg/m2, the multivariate pooled hazard ratio (HR) of GBS was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.73) for overweight participants (25kg/m2≤BMI<30 kg/m2), and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.21, 2.35) for obese participants (BMI≥30 kg/m2) (P for trend = 0.001). Compared to participants with normal WC (<35 inches for women and <40 inches for men), the HR of GBS was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.10, 2.18) for participants with high WC (≥35 inches for women, and ≥40 inches for men). The positive associations of BMI and WC with risk of GBS were attenuated to null after mutually adjusting for BMI and WC. Joint analysis showed that the HR was 1.84 (95% CI: 1.27, 2.66) for participants with high WC and BMI≥25 kg/m2 in comparison to participants with normal WC and BMI<25kg/m2. CONCLUSION: These data from large cohorts showed that higher BMI and WC jointly were associated with higher risk of GBS. Our study highlighted the importance of maintaining a normal body weight and waist circumference in prevention of GBS.


Subject(s)
Guillain-Barre Syndrome/etiology , Guillain-Barre Syndrome/physiopathology , Waist Circumference/physiology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Body Weight/physiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/physiopathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Waist-Hip Ratio/methods
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(17): 509-514, 2020 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32352955

ABSTRACT

To evaluate progress toward prevention of enteric illnesses, the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) of CDC's Emerging Infections Program monitors the incidence of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by eight pathogens transmitted commonly through food at 10 U.S. sites.* This report summarizes preliminary 2019 data and describes changes in incidence compared with that during 2016-2018. The incidence of enteric infections caused by these eight pathogens reported by FoodNet sites in 2019 continued to increase or remained unchanged, indicating progress in controlling major foodborne pathogens in the United States has stalled. Campylobacter and Salmonella caused the largest proportion of illnesses; trends in incidence varied by Salmonella serotype. Widespread adoption of whole genome sequencing (WGS) of bacteria has improved the ability to identify outbreaks, emerging strains, and sources of pathogens. To maximize the potential of WGS to link illnesses to particular sources, testing of isolates by clinical and public health laboratories is needed. Reductions in Salmonella serotype Typhimurium suggest that targeted interventions (e.g., vaccinating chickens and other food animals) might decrease human infections. Reducing contamination during food production, processing, and preparation will require more widespread implementation of known prevention measures and of new strategies that target particular pathogens and serotypes.


Subject(s)
Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Food Microbiology , Food Parasitology , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/parasitology , Humans , Incidence , United States/epidemiology
10.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 111: 104579, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945454

ABSTRACT

FDA developed the interim reference level (IRL) for lead of 3 µg/day in children and 12.5 µg/day in women of childbearing age (WOCBA) to better protect the fetus from lead toxicity. These IRLs correspond to a blood lead level (BLL) of 0.5 µg/dL in both populations. The current investigation was performed to determine if the IRL for WOCBA should apply to the general population of adults. A literature review of epidemiological studies was conducted to determine whether a BLL of 0.5 µg/dL is associated with adverse effects in adults. Some studies reported adverse effects over a wide range of BLLs that included 0.5 µg/dL adding uncertainty to conclusions about effects at 0.5 µg/dL; however, no studies clearly identified this BLL as an adverse effect level. Results also showed that the previously developed PTTDI for adults of 75 µg/day lead may not be health protective, supporting use of a lower reference value for lead toxicity in this population group. Use of the 12.5 µg/day IRL as a benchmark for dietary lead intake is one way FDA will ensure that dietary lead intake in adults is reduced.


Subject(s)
Dietary Exposure/adverse effects , Dietary Exposure/standards , Lead/administration & dosage , Lead/adverse effects , Adult , Environmental Pollutants , Humans , Lead/blood
11.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 110: 104516, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31707132

ABSTRACT

Reducing lead exposure is a public health priority for the US Food and Drug Administration as well as other federal agencies. The goals of this research were to 1) update the maximum daily dietary intake of lead from food, termed an interim reference level (IRL), for children and for women of childbearing age (WOCBA) and 2) to confirm through a literature review that with the exception of neurodevelopment, which was not evaluated here, no adverse effects of lead consistently occur at the blood lead level (BLL) associated with the IRL. Because no safe level of lead exposure has yet been identified for children's health, the IRLs of 3 µg/day for children and 12.5 µg/day for WOCBA were derived from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reference value of 5 µg/dL BLL, the level at which public health actions should be initiated. The literature review showed that no adverse effects of lead consistently occurred at the BLL associated with the IRLs (0.5 µg/dL). The IRLs of 3 µg/day for children and 12.5 µg/day for WOCBA should serve as useful benchmarks in evaluating the potential for adverse effects of dietary lead.


Subject(s)
Dietary Exposure/standards , Environmental Pollutants/standards , Lead/standards , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Dietary Exposure/prevention & control , Environmental Pollutants/toxicity , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lead/toxicity , Pregnancy , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
13.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 119(11): 1831-1841.e6, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31296427

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: US obesity rates are at historically high levels, increasing the risk of negative health and economic outcomes at individual and population levels. Findings from earlier studies indicate that many consumers lack a clear understanding of calorie needs, potentially affecting their ability to manage caloric intake. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the knowledge of typical daily calorie needs of US adults by demographic and other characteristics, using a nationally representative sample. DESIGN: Data were analyzed from 6,267 respondents to the 2007-2008 and 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and its supplemental data source, the Flexible Consumer Behavior Survey, to assess reported knowledge of typical daily calorie requirements and associations with demographic and other characteristics of interest. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Logistic regression for complex sample surveys was used to estimate associations between self-reported daily calorie needs for men and women aged 21 years and older and participant characteristics. RESULTS: Most respondents accurately reported typical daily calorie needs for a person of their sex, age group, and physical activity level, however, distinct differences emerged between demographic groups. Women, non-Hispanic whites, and those with higher income and education levels were more likely to estimate typical daily calorie needs accurately; men were almost four times more likely than women to indicate a lack of knowledge of daily calorie needs. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of typical daily calorie requirements is a foundational concept of nutrition literacy. Educational efforts to increase awareness, knowledge, and use of calorie information for certain groups may be helpful to refine interventions and ultimately improve public health in the United States.


Subject(s)
Energy Intake , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Nutritional Requirements , Socioeconomic Factors , Adult , Body Mass Index , Educational Status , Ethnicity , Exercise , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Humans , Income , Male , Nutrition Surveys , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Public Health Nutr ; 22(14): 2531-2542, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31317857

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare caffeinated energy drink adverse event (AE) report/exposure call data from the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition's Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS) and the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Data were evaluated from US-based CAERS reports and NPDS exposure calls, including report/exposure call year, age, sex, location, single v. multiple product consumption, outcome, symptom, intentionality (NPDS only), report type, product name (CAERS only). PARTICIPANTS: The analysis defined participants (cases) by the number of caffeinated energy drink products indicated in each AE report or exposure call. Single product cases included 357 from CAERS and 12 822 from NPDS; multiple product cases included 153 from CAERS and 931 from NPDS. RESULTS: CAERS v. NPDS single product cases were older and more frequently indicated serious symptoms. Multiple v. single product consumers were older in both. In CAERS, unlike NPDS, most multiple product consumers were female. CAERS single v. multiple product reports cited higher proportions of life-threatening events, but less often indicated hospitalization and serious events. NPDS multiple v. single product cases involved fewer ≤5-year-olds and were more often intentional. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, both data sources contribute to post-market surveillance and improve understanding of public health concerns.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Caffeine/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Energy Drinks/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poison Control Centers , United States/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
15.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(16): 369-373, 2019 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31022166

ABSTRACT

Foodborne diseases represent a major health problem in the United States. The Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) of CDC's Emerging Infections Program monitors cases of laboratory-diagnosed infection caused by eight pathogens transmitted commonly through food in 10 U.S. sites.* This report summarizes preliminary 2018 data and changes since 2015. During 2018, FoodNet identified 25,606 infections, 5,893 hospitalizations, and 120 deaths. The incidence of most infections is increasing, including those caused by Campylobacter and Salmonella, which might be partially attributable to the increased use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs). The incidence of Cyclospora infections increased markedly compared with 2015-2017, in part related to large outbreaks associated with produce (1). More targeted prevention measures are needed on produce farms, food animal farms, and in meat and poultry processing establishments to make food safer and decrease human illness.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Food Microbiology/statistics & numerical data , Food Parasitology/statistics & numerical data , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Public Health Surveillance , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , United States/epidemiology
16.
Microbiol Resour Announc ; 8(12)2019 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30938701

ABSTRACT

Water from the Hickey Run Tributary of the Anacostia River is being collected quarterly (beginning August 2018) and analyzed to create high-resolution baseline taxonomic profiles of microbiota associated with this important aquatic ecosystem, which has a long history of exposure to residential and commercial effluents from Washington, DC. These United States National Arboretum Microbial Observatory data are available under NCBI BioProject number PRJNA498951.

17.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 16(4): 290-297, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30735066

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen that disproportionally affects pregnant females, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals. Using U.S. Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) surveillance data, we examined listeriosis incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and pregnancy status across three periods from 2008 to 2016, as recent incidence trends in U.S. subgroups had not been evaluated. The invasive listeriosis annual incidence rate per 100,000 for 2008-2016 was 0.28 cases among the general population (excluding pregnant females), and 3.73 cases among pregnant females. For adults ≥70 years, the annual incidence rate per 100,000 was 1.33 cases. No significant change in estimated listeriosis incidence was found over the 2008-2016 period, except for a small, but significantly lower pregnancy-associated rate in 2011-2013 when compared with 2008-2010. Among the nonpregnancy-associated cases, RRs increased with age from 0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.73) for 0- to 14-year olds to 44.9 (33.5-60.0) for ≥85-year olds, compared with 15- to 44-year olds. Males had an incidence of 1.28 (1.12-1.45) times that of females. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, the incidence was 1.57 (1.18-1.20) times higher among non-Hispanic Asians, 1.49 (1.22-1.83) among non-Hispanic blacks, and 1.73 (1.15-2.62) among Hispanics. Among females of childbearing age, non-Hispanic Asian females had 2.72 (1.51-4.89) and Hispanic females 3.13 (2.12-4.89) times higher incidence than non-Hispanic whites. We observed a higher percentage of deaths among older patient groups compared with 15- to 44-year olds. This study is the first characterizing higher RRs for listeriosis in the United States among non-Hispanic blacks and Asians compared with non-Hispanic whites. This information for public health risk managers may spur further research to understand if differences in listeriosis rates relate to differences in consumption patterns of foods with higher contamination levels, food handling practices, comorbidities, immunodeficiencies, health care access, or other factors.


Subject(s)
Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Ethnicity , Female , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Listeriosis/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology
18.
Cancer Causes Control ; 30(3): 249-258, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30666489

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Investigators have reported inconsistent findings regarding associations between body mass index (BMI) and bladder cancer risk, and they have postulated that sex steroids mediate such associations. We assessed the impact of BMI on the relationship between bladder cancer risk and combinations of age at first childbirth, parity, and age at menopause, among Egyptian women. METHODS: We used data from our multicenter case-control study of 419 cases and 786 controls in logistic regression models to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of such associations. RESULTS: Age > 18 years at first childbirth and parity ≤ 6 were significantly associated with bladder cancer risk, which was higher when both factors (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.55-3.43) and age at menopause < 45 years (AOR = 3.51, 95% CI = 1.88-6.55) were present. Early menopause was associated with higher bladder cancer risk in obese (AOR = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.40-5.98) but not normal weight women (AOR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.58-1.65; Pinteraction = 0.11), and the risk was greatest when both first childbirth at age > 18 years and parity ≤ 6 were present (AOR = 7.60, 95% CI = 1.84-31.35); however, overweight and obesity were associated with significantly lower bladder cancer risk (AOR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.43-0.81, and AOR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.18-0.38, respectively). CONCLUSION: Body mass index appears to modify bladder cancer risk in Egyptian women after menopause by slightly enhancing the risk associated with low estrogen exposure among the obese only. Longitudinal studies of the BMI role in bladder malignancy in this distinctive population are required.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Estrogens/administration & dosage , Menopause , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Egypt/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Overweight/epidemiology , Parity , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
19.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(11): 324-328, 2018 Mar 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29565841

ABSTRACT

Despite ongoing food safety measures in the United States, foodborne illness continues to be a substantial health burden. The 10 U.S. sites of the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet)* monitor cases of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine pathogens transmitted commonly through food. This report summarizes preliminary 2017 data and describes changes in incidence since 2006. In 2017, FoodNet reported 24,484 infections, 5,677 hospitalizations, and 122 deaths. Compared with 2014-2016, the 2017 incidence of infections with Campylobacter, Listeria, non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), Yersinia, Vibrio, and Cyclospora increased. The increased incidences of pathogens for which testing was previously limited might have resulted from the increased use and sensitivity of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs), which can improve incidence estimates (1). Compared with 2006-2008, the 2017 incidence of infections with Salmonella serotypes Typhimurium and Heidelberg decreased, and the incidence of serotypes Javiana, Infantis, and Thompson increased. New regulatory requirements that include enhanced testing of poultry products for Salmonella† might have contributed to the decreases. The incidence of STEC O157 infections during 2017 also decreased compared with 2006-2008, which parallels reductions in isolations from ground beef.§ The declines in two Salmonella serotypes and STEC O157 infections provide supportive evidence that targeted control measures are effective. The marked increases in infections caused by some Salmonella serotypes provide an opportunity to investigate food and nonfood sources of infection and to design specific interventions.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Food Parasitology , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/parasitology , Humans , Incidence , United States/epidemiology
20.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(15): 397-403, 2017 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28426643

ABSTRACT

Foodborne diseases represent a substantial public health concern in the United States. CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors cases reported from 10 U.S. sites* of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine enteric pathogens commonly transmitted through food. This report describes preliminary surveillance data for 2016 on the nine pathogens and changes in incidences compared with 2013-2015. In 2016, FoodNet identified 24,029 infections, 5,512 hospitalizations, and 98 deaths caused by these pathogens. The use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) by clinical laboratories to detect enteric pathogens has been steadily increasing since FoodNet began surveying clinical laboratories in 2010 (1). CIDTs complicate the interpretation of FoodNet surveillance data because pathogen detection could be affected by changes in health care provider behaviors or laboratory testing practices (2). Health care providers might be more likely to order CIDTs because these tests are quicker and easier to use than traditional culture methods, a circumstance that could increase pathogen detection (3). Similarly, pathogen detection could also be increasing as clinical laboratories adopt DNA-based syndromic panels, which include pathogens not often included in routine stool culture (4,5). In addition, CIDTs do not yield isolates, which public health officials rely on to distinguish pathogen subtypes, determine antimicrobial resistance, monitor trends, and detect outbreaks. To obtain isolates for infections identified by CIDTs, laboratories must perform reflex culture†; if clinical laboratories do not, the burden of culturing falls to state public health laboratories, which might not be able to absorb that burden as the adoption of these tests increases (2). Strategies are needed to preserve access to bacterial isolates for further characterization and to determine the effect of changing trends in testing practices on surveillance.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/statistics & numerical data , Food Microbiology , Food Parasitology , Foodborne Diseases/diagnosis , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Culture Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...