Environmental risk assessment of hydrotropes in the United States, Europe, and Australia.

An environmental assessment of hydrotropes was conducted under the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Screening Information Data Sets (SIDS) for High Production Volume (HPV) Program via the Global International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) Hydrotropes Consortium. The assessment and its conclusions were presented at a meeting of the OECD member countries in Washington, DC in 2005. The SIDS Initial Assessment Report (SIAR) was accepted by the membership. Their conclusion was "The chemicals in this [hydrotropes] category are of low priority for further work because of their low hazard profile." Hydrotropes are used to solubilize the water-insoluble ingredients of cleaning and personal care products including, for example, powder and liquid laundry detergents, hard-surface cleaners, machine dishwashing rinse aids, hand dishwashing liquids, body washes, shampoos, hair conditioners, and liquid hand and face soaps. Global production equals approximately 46 500 metric tons, a little more than half of which is used in the United States. The 8 chemicals accounted for in the "hydrotropes category" include ammonium, Ca, K, and Na salts that are described by 10 Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registration numbers. The 8 chemical entities are generally comparable and predictable in their chemical behavior and that measured and/or modeled data for members from one subgroup can be applied to other subgroups and to the hydrotropes category as a whole. The assessment is based on a search for and evaluation of available data on physical­chemical properties, biodegradability, removal by wastewater treatment, and aquatic toxicity. Reliable ecotoxicity and environmental fate data were found for selected members of the category. Partitioning, once released into the environment, and exposure in surface waters were modeled for consumer use and manufacturing scenarios relevant to the United States, Europe, and Australia. The models indicate 99+% of the hydrotropes will partition to water. Furthermore, given the low potential for hydrotropes reaching the terrestrial environment and their lack of persistence or bioaccumulation, the focus of the assessment is on the aquatic environment, specifically the water compartment. Aquatic risks were assessed in each scenario using what is referred to as the PEC/PNEC ratio. The modeled predicted environmental concentration (PEC), accounting for volume released and wastewater treatment, is divided by the predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) derived from the aquatic toxicity tests. The closest a predicted environmental concentration came to the toxicity threshold is 0.125 (or 12.5% of the no effect concentration) and that is for a hypothetical manufacturing facility that produces the entire annual volume of hydrotropes and discharges to a small (10%ile) stream under low flow (7Q10) conditions. PEC/PNEC ratios were considerably smaller for consumer use scenarios. The ratios were 0.0002 for a low flow (7Q10) stream scenario in the United States, 0.026 to 0.089 for regional and local water bodies, respectively, in Europe, and 0.004 to 0.036 for oceans and rivers, respectively, in Australia. In conclusion, aquatic hazard levels are not expected to be reached under exaggerated conditions of manufacture or normal consumer use of hydrotropes. Hydrotropes are neither persistent nor bioaccumulative in the environment.

Consideration of exposure and species sensitivity of triclosan in the freshwater environment.

Triclosan (TCS) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial used in consumer products including toothpaste and hand soap. After being used, TCS is washed or rinsed off and residuals that are not biodegraded or otherwise removed during wastewater treatment can enter the aquatic environment in wastewater effluents and sludges. The environmental exposure and toxicity of TCS has been the subject of various scientific and regulatory discussions in recent years. There have been a number of publications in the past 5 y reporting toxicity, fate and transport, and in-stream monitoring data as well as predictions from aquatic risk assessments. State-of-the-science probabilistic exposure models, including Geography-referenced Regional Exposure Assessment Tool for European Rivers (GREAT-ER) for European surface waters and Pharmaceutical Assessment and Transport Evalutation (PhATE) for US surface waters, have been used to predict in-stream concentrations (PECs). These models take into account spatial and temporal variability in river flows and wastewater emissions based on empirically derived estimates of chemical removal in wastewater treatment and in receiving waters. These model simulations (based on realistic use levels of TCS) have been validated with river monitoring data in areas known to be receiving high wastewater loads. The results suggest that 90th percentile (low flow) TCS concentrations are less than 200 ng/L for the Aire-Calder catchment in the United Kingdom and between 250 ng/L (with in-stream removal) and 850 ng/L (without in-stream removal) for a range of US surface waters. To better identify the aquatic risk of TCS, a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) was constructed based on chronic toxicity values, either no observed effect concentrations (NOECs) or various percentile adverse effect concentrations (EC10-25 values) for 14 aquatic species including fish, invertebrates, macrophytes, and algae. The SSD approach is believed to represent a more realistic threshold of effect than a predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) based on the data from the single most sensitive species tested. The log-logistic SSD was used to estimate a PNEC, based on an HC5,50 (the concentration estimated to affect the survival, reproduction and/or growth of 5% of species with a 50% confidence interval). The PNEC for TCS was 1,550 ng/L. Comparing the SSD-based PNEC with the PECs derived from GREATER and PhATE modeling to simulate in-river conditions in Europe and the United States, the PEC to PNEC ratios are less than unity suggesting risks to pelagic species are low even under the highest likely exposures which would occur immediately downstream of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharge points. In-stream sorption, biodegradation, and photodegradation will further reduce pelagic exposures of TCS. Monitoring data in Europe and the United States corroborate the modeled PEC estimates and reductions in TCS concentrations with distance downstream of WWTP discharges. Environmental metabolites, bioaccumulation, biochemical responses including endocrine-related effects, and community level effects are far less well studied for this chemical but are addressed in the discussion. The aquatic risk assessment for TCS should be refined as additional information becomes available.