Regional anaesthesia training in the UK - a national survey.

Background: Adequate training of anaesthetists in regional anaesthesia is important to ensure optimal patient access to regional anaesthesia. Methods: We undertook a national survey of UK trainee anaesthetists and Royal College of Anaesthetists (RCoA) tutors to assess experiences of training in regional anaesthesia. We performed descriptive statistics for baseline characteristics, and logistic regression of training indices and tutor confidence that their hospital could provide regional anaesthesia training at all three stages of the RCoA 2021 curriculum. Results: A total of 492 trainees (19.2%) and 114 tutors (45.2%) completed the survey. Trainees were less likely to have received training in chest/abdominal wall compared with upper/lower limb blocks {erector spinae vs femoral block (odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.39), P<0.001}, or achieved >20 chest/abdominal wall blocks by Stage 3 of training (chest vs lower limb block [OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05-0.15, P<0.001]. There was a strong association between training received, number of blocks performed (>20 vs 0-5 blocks), and self-reported ability to perform blocks independently, OR 20.9 (95% CI 9.38-53.2). 24/182 (13%) and 10/182 (5.5%) of trainees had performed ≥50 non-obstetric lumbar and thoracic epidurals, respectively, by Stage 3 training. There was a positive association between having a lead clinician for regional anaesthesia, particularly those with paid sessions, and reported confidence to provide regional anaesthesia training at all stages of the curriculum (Stage 3 OR 7.27 [95% CI 2.64-22.0]). Conclusion: Our results confirm the importance of clinical experience and access to training in regional anaesthesia, and support the introduction of departmental regional anaesthesia leads to improve equity and quality in training opportunities.

Recommendations for anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Recent recommendations describe a set of core anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA). This project aimed to generate consensus recommendations for core structures to identify during the performance of intermediate and advanced blocks. An initial longlist of structures was refined by an international panel of key opinion leaders in UGRA over a three-round Delphi process. All rounds were conducted virtually and anonymously. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for "orientation scanning" (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for "block view" (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). A "strong recommendation" was made if ≥75% of participants rated any structure as "definitely include" in any round. A "weak recommendation" was made if >50% of participants rated it as "definitely include" or "probably include" for all rounds, but the criterion for strong recommendation was never met. Structures which did not meet either criterion were excluded. Forty-one participants were invited and 40 accepted; 38 completed all three rounds. Participants considered the ultrasound scanning for 19 peripheral nerve blocks across all three rounds. Two hundred and seventy-four structures were reviewed for both orientation scanning and block view; a "strong recommendation" was made for 60 structures on orientation scanning and 44 on the block view. A "weak recommendation" was made for 107 and 62 structures, respectively. These recommendations are intended to help standardize teaching and research in UGRA and support widespread and consistent practice.

Core outcome set for peripheral regional anesthesia research: a systematic review and Delphi study.

BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE: There is heterogeneity among the outcomes used in regional anesthesia research. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to produce a core outcome set for regional anesthesia research. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and Delphi study to develop this core outcome set. A systematic review of the literature from January 2015 to December 2019 was undertaken to generate a long list of potential outcomes to be included in the core outcome set. For each outcome found, the parameters such as the measurement scale, timing and definitions, were compiled. Regional anesthesia experts were then recruited to participate in a three-round electronic modified Delphi process with incremental thresholds to generate a core outcome set. Once the core outcomes were decided, a final Delphi survey and video conference vote was used to reach a consensus on the outcome parameters. RESULTS: Two hundred and six papers were generated following the systematic review, producing a long list of 224 unique outcomes. Twenty-one international regional anesthesia experts participated in the study. Ten core outcomes were selected after three Delphi survey rounds with 13 outcome parameters reaching consensus after a final Delphi survey and video conference. CONCLUSIONS: We present the first core outcome set for regional anesthesia derived by international expert consensus. These are proposed not to limit the outcomes examined in future studies, but rather to serve as a minimum core set. If adopted, this may increase the relevance of outcomes being studied, reduce selective reporting bias and increase the availability and suitability of data for meta-analysis in this area.

Safety profile and outcome after ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca catheters for hip fracture: a single-centre propensity-matched historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: Peripheral nerve blocks improve analgesia following hip fracture; however, there are little published data on safety and outcomes of continuous regional anesthetic techniques. Our institution offers pre- and perioperative, anesthesiologist-delivered ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca catheters (FICs) to patients with hip fracture. We aimed to document the safety profile of this technique and establish whether there are any significant clinical benefits in outcomes measured by the UK National Hip Fracture Database. METHODS: We performed a single-centre historical cohort study of 2,187 patients admitted to our institution with hip fracture over a 5.75-year period. Of these, 915 were treated with FIC and 1,272 received standard care (single-shot block). To control for baseline differences between these two cohorts, we used propensity score matching and exact matching, resulting in two well-matched groups of 728 patients treated with an FIC and standard care. RESULTS: No serious complications were observed as a result of an FIC. Unplanned removal occurred in 146/852 (17.1%) patients with documented data. No differences in 30-day mortality, pressure ulcer rates, or hospital length of stay were observed between the matched groups. The percentage of patients who were discharged to their usual residence was 79.3% in the FIC cohort vs 75.1% in the standard care cohort (difference, 4.2%; 95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 8.4; P = 0.06). DISCUSSION: Our single-centre propensity-matched historical cohort study suggests that ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca catheterization is a safe technique for patients with hip fracture and that our service is deliverable and sustainable within the UK's National Health Service. This study did not show statistically significant differences in outcomes between patients treated with FIC and standard care. An adequately powered multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing these approaches is warranted.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les blocs nerveux périphériques améliorent l'analgésie après une fracture de la hanche; cependant, il existe peu de données publiées sur l'innocuité et les devenirs des techniques d'anesthésie régionale continue. Notre établissement propose des cathéters iliofasciaux suprainguinaux échoguidés pré- et périopératoires aux patients souffrant d'une fracture de la hanche. Notre objectif était de documenter le profil d'innocuité de cette technique et de déterminer s'il existe des avantages cliniques significatifs au niveau des devenirs tels que mesurés par la Base de données nationale sur les fractures de la hanche du Royaume-Uni. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte historique monocentrique portant sur 2187 patients admis dans notre établissement avec une fracture de la hanche sur une période de 5,75 ans. De ce nombre, 915 ont été traités avec un cathéter iliofascial et 1272 ont reçu des soins standard (bloc à injection unique). Pour tenir compte des différences initiales entre ces deux cohortes, nous avons utilisé l'appariement par score de propension et l'appariement exact, ce qui a donné deux groupes bien appariés de 728 patients chaque, les patients étant traités par cathéter ilio-fascial ou soins standard. RéSULTATS: Aucune complication grave n'a été observée à la suite de l'utilisation d'un cathéter iliofascial. Un retrait imprévu est survenu chez 146/852 (17,1 %) patients dont les données ont été documentées. Aucune différence dans la mortalité à 30 jours, les taux d'escarres ou la durée de séjour à l'hôpital n'a été observée entre les groupes appariés. Le pourcentage de patients qui ont reçu leur congé à leur résidence habituelle était de 79,3 % dans la cohorte cathéter iliofascial vs 75,1 % dans la cohorte de soins standard (différence, 4,2 %; intervalle de confiance à 95 %, -0,1 à 8,4; P = 0,06). DISCUSSION: Notre étude de cohorte historique monocentrique et appariée par propension suggère que le cathétérisme iliofascial suprainguinal échoguidé est une technique sécuritaire pour les patients atteints de fracture de la hanche et que notre service est utilisable et durable au sein du National Health Service du Royaume-Uni. Cette étude n'a pas montré de différences statistiquement significatives dans les devenirs entre les patients traités par cathéter iliofascial ou par soins standard. Une étude randomisée contrôlée multicentrique suffisamment puissante comparant ces approches est justifiée.

International consensus on anatomical structures to identify on ultrasound for the performance of basic blocks in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

There is no universally agreed set of anatomical structures that must be identified on ultrasound for the performance of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) techniques. This study aimed to produce standardized recommendations for core (minimum) structures to identify during seven basic blocks. An international consensus was sought through a modified Delphi process. A long-list of anatomical structures was refined through serial review by key opinion leaders in UGRA. All rounds were conducted remotely and anonymously to facilitate equal contribution of each participant. Blocks were considered twice in each round: for "orientation scanning" (the dynamic process of acquiring the final view) and for the "block view" (which visualizes the block site and is maintained for needle insertion/injection). Strong recommendations for inclusion were made if ≥75% of participants rated a structure as "definitely include" in any round. Weak recommendations were made if >50% of participants rated a structure as "definitely include" or "probably include" for all rounds (but the criterion for "strong recommendation" was never met). Thirty-six participants (94.7%) completed all rounds. 128 structures were reviewed; a "strong recommendation" is made for 35 structures on orientation scanning and 28 for the block view. A "weak recommendation" is made for 36 and 20 structures, respectively. This study provides recommendations on the core (minimum) set of anatomical structures to identify during ultrasound scanning for seven basic blocks in UGRA. They are intended to support consistent practice, empower non-experts using basic UGRA techniques, and standardize teaching and research.