ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Early opioid initiation is recommended for advanced cancer pain, however the timing of opioid commencement in relation to diagnosis has not been described, and the role of palliative care prescribers is unclear. This study aims to determine the timing of opioid initiation by prescriber and cancer type in relation to key timepoints in the cancer illness course (diagnosis, palliative care referral and death). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients at a quaternary cancer centre with incurable advanced cancer of five different subtype groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, health service use and details of first slow and immediate release opioid prescription are reported. RESULTS: Among 200 patients, median time to first immediate release opioid prescription was 23 days (IQR 1-82) and to slow release opioid prescription was 47 days (IQR 14-155). Most patients (95%, (n=190) were referred to palliative care (median time to referral 54 days (IQR 18-190)). Non-palliative care prescribers initiated slow release opioids for half the cohort (49%, n=97) prior to referral. Patients with pancreatic cancer had the shortest time to slow/immediate release opioid prescription (median 10 days (IQR 0-39) and 26 days (IQR 1-43) respectively) and shortest survival (median 136 days (IQR 82-214)). CONCLUSIONS: Median time to opioid commencement was approximately 3 weeks after diagnosis. Despite early palliative care involvement, opioid initiation by non-palliative care clinicians was common and remains important. Timely palliative care referral for those with pancreatic cancer may include consideration of earlier complex pain presentations and shorter prognosis.
ABSTRACT
We read with interest the article by Ramos-Rincon and colleagues about patients with COVID-19 dying in acute medical wards in a Spanish University hospital [...].
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Terminal Care , Humans , Palliative Care , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) is important, however ethnic minorities have half the completion rates in the United States compared to Caucasian counterparts, and in Australia only 3.5% of advance directives were completed by those overseas-born.Educational intervention improves ACP knowledge and subsequent uptake. We evaluated immediate and longer-term outcomes of a co-designed ACP education toolkit in Chinese-speaking people in Victoria, Australia. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Chinese-speaking community members who participated in a co-designed Chinese ACP educational workshop. A self-selected subgroup were subsequently contacted 6 months later to determine longer-term outcomes. RESULTS: Of 519 attendees across 17 workshops, 325 (63%) completed the evaluation. The majority (63%;n = 206) were previously unaware of ACP. Perception of receipt of useful information positively correlated with motivation to undertake ACP (r = 0.3486, p < 0.001). Of the 70 participants who consented to follow up, 36% (n = 26) agreed to participate in structured telephone interviews. English speakers were more likely to have undertaken ACP (n = 6 vs n = 3). ACP completion was not associated with being a carer or suffering from cancer or chronic illness. CONCLUSIONS: This first Australian study evaluating ACP co-design education implementation outcomes in Chinese-speaking people supports that motivation to undertake ACP is related to knowledge, albeit a modest ACP uptake in a small follow up sample. Clinicians should note that this assists with ACP uptake, with likely downstream improved health outcomes. This co-designed toolkit could be helpful in increasing ACP uptake. Future engagement by Chinese language societies to overcome further barriers to ACP is needed.
