Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 22(1): 1339, 2022 Nov 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36368986

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since 2021, pharmacists in Poland have been authorised to administer vaccinations against COVID-19, which is of particular significance in the efforts towards preventing the spread of the pandemic. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the patients' satisfaction with delivering vaccinations through national vaccination centres. METHODS: This study was conducted in 2021. The research tool was an anonymous questionnaire distributed to patients after vaccination. The questionnaire was developed specifically for the purpose of the study. Ultimately, 628 patients participated in this study. RESULTS: Nearly 97% of the respondents agreed that the administration of vaccinations by pharmacists had been convenient, and pharmacists possessed the relevant skills to provide this service. Almost 90% of the respondents expressed their readiness to be vaccinated by pharmacists again. Nearly all the respondents indicated that pharmacists should also provide other vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in Poland have a positive attitude toward vaccinations administered by pharmacists in national vaccination centres.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pharmacists , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , COVID-19 Vaccines , Poland , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35270231

ABSTRACT

(1) Introduction: Pharmacists are medical professionals who play an active role in the protection of public health. Since 2021, pharmacists with an appropriate certification have been authorised to administer vaccines against COVID-19. (2) Objective: The objective of this study was to ascertain the perceptions of patients about receiving vaccinations through community pharmacies. (3) Material and methods: This study was conducted in 2021. The research tool was an anonymous questionnaire published on the websites of patient organisations. Ultimately, 1062 patients participated in this study. (4) Results: This study shows that most of the respondents find community pharmacies more accessible than outpatient clinics (85.3%). Sixty-one percent of the respondents stated that getting vaccinated at pharmacies would be less time consuming than at outpatient clinics. Nearly every third respondent (29.5%) declared that they would get vaccinated if they received such a recommendation from a pharmacist. Fifty-six percent of the respondents were of the opinion that the administration of vaccines by pharmacists would relieve the burden on medical staff and the healthcare system. (5) Conclusions: Polish patients participating in the study have a positive attitude towards the implementation of vaccination services in community pharmacies as an effective way of combating infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Community Pharmacy Services , Pharmacies , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
3.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 26(3): 223-233, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25703769

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current anaphylaxis action plans (AAPs) are based on written instructions without inclusion of pictograms. OBJECTIVES: To develop an AAP with pictorial aids and to prospectively validate the pictogram components of this plan. METHODS: Participants recruited from the emergency department and allergy clinic participated in a questionnaire to validate pictograms depicting key counseling points of an anaphylactic reaction. Children ≥ 10 years of age and caregivers of children < 10 years with acute anaphylaxis or who carried epinephrine auto-injector for confirmed allergy were eligible. Guessability, translucency, and recall were assessed for 11 pictogram designs. Pictograms identified as correct or partially correct by at least 85% of participants were considered valid. Three independent reviewers assessed these outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 115 total participants, 73 (63%) were female, 76 (66%) were parents/guardians, and 39 (34%) were children aged 10-17. Overall, 10 pictograms (91%) reached ≥ 85% for correct guessability, translucency, and recall. Four pictograms were redesigned to reach the preset validation target. One pictogram depicting symptom management (5-min wait time after first epinephrine treatment) reached 82% translucency after redesign. However, it reached 98% and 100% of correct guessability and recall, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We prospectively designed and validated a set of pictograms to be included in an AAP. The incorporation of validated pictograms into an AAP may potentially increase comprehension of the triggers, signs and symptoms, and management of an anaphylactic reaction.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Health Communication/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/education , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Canada , Child , Emergency Service, Hospital , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Female , Health Communication/trends , Humans , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...