Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 26(5): 1697-1705, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297974

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To validate cardiovascular risk prediction models for individuals with diabetes using the UK Biobank in order to assess their applicability. METHODS: We externally validated 19 cardiovascular risk scores from seven risk prediction models (Chang et al., Framingham, University of Hong Kong-Singapore [HKU-SG], Li et al, RECODe [risk equations for complications of type 2 diabetes], SCORE [Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation] and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2 [UKPDS OM2]), identified from systematic reviews, using UK Biobank data from 2006 to 2021 (n = 23 685; participant age 40-71 years, 63.5% male). We evaluated performance by assessing the discrimination and calibration of the models for the endpoints of mortality, cardiovascular mortality, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and ischaemic heart disease. RESULTS: Over a total of 269 430 person-years of follow-up (median 11.89 years), the models showed low-to-moderate discrimination performance on external validation (concordance indices [c-indices] 0.50-0.71). Most models had low calibration with overprediction of the observed risk. RECODe outperformed other models across four comparable endpoints for discrimination: all-cause mortality (c-index 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.69), congestive heart failure (c-index 0.71, 95% CI 0.69-0.72), myocardial infarction (c-index 0.67, 95% CI 0.65-0.68); and stroke (c-index 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68), and for calibration (except for all-cause mortality). The UKPDS OM2 had comparable performance to RECODe for all-cause mortality (c-index 0.67, 95% CI 0.66-0.69) and cardiovascular mortality (c-index 0.71, 95% CI 0.70-0.73), but worse performance for other outcomes. The models performed better for younger participants and somewhat better for non-White ethnicities. Models developed from non-Western datasets showed worse performance in our UK-based validation set. CONCLUSIONS: The RECODe model led to better risk estimations in this predominantly White European population. Further validation is needed in non-Western populations to assess generalizability to other populations.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Heart Failure , Myocardial Infarction , Stroke , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Biological Specimen Banks , UK Biobank , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Stroke/etiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...