Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 24(4): 1063-1072, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33850270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), either by medical or surgical castration, is the backbone for standard treatment of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer, yet it is also associated with various metabolic and cardiovascular complications. Recent evidence have shown that obesity, insulin resistance, or metabolic disturbances can be associated with changes in the gut microbiome, while animal studies also show that castration is associated with changes in the gut microbiome. This study aims to investigate whether the fecal microbiota in prostate cancer patients who had undergone prostatectomy or ADT are different, and explore changes in phylogeny and pathways that may lead to side effects from ADT. METHODS: A total of 86 prostate cancer patients (56 patients on ADT and 30 patients with prostatectomy) were recruited. The fecal microbiota was analyzed by the 16S rRNA gene for alpha- and beta-diversities by QIIME2, as well as the predicted metabolic pathways by Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States 2. RESULTS: The alpha-diversity was significantly lower in the ADT group. The beta-diversity was significantly different between the groups, in which Ruminococcus gnavus and Bacteroides spp were having higher relative abundance in the ADT group, whereas Lachnospira and Roseburia were reduced. The Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio is noted to be lower in the ADT group as well. The functional pathway prediction showed that the biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin) and propanoate was enriched in the ADT as well as the energy cycle pathways. This study is limited by the cross-sectional design and the clinical heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant difference in gut microbiome between prostate cancer patients on ADT and prostatectomy. We theorize that this difference may contribute to the development of metabolic complications from ADT. Further longitudinal studies are awaited.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Feces/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male
2.
J Urol ; 202(5): 986-993, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31112104

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In this study we assessed the effects of a ramping protocol in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study patients with renal stones were randomized to receive shock wave lithotripsy delivered using a ramping protocol in group 1 (first 1,000 shocks at energy level 5 followed by 1,000 shocks at energy level 6 and 1,000 final shocks at energy level 7) and a fixed voltage protocol in group 2 (all 3,000 shocks at energy level 7). Treatment was administered using a Modulith® SLX-F2. The primary outcome was treatment success 12 weeks after a single shock wave lithotripsy session, defined as lack of a stone or a less than 4 mm stone fragment on computerized tomography. Other outcomes included the stone-free rate and the perinephric hematoma incidence. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients (150 per group) were recruited between February 2016 and June 2018. The 2 groups did not differ in baseline parameters. Group 1 received 14.8% lower energy than group 2, which was significant (p <0.001). The treatment success rate in groups 1 and 2 was 67.8% and 73.6%, respectively, which did not statistically differ (group 1 crude OR 0.753, 95% CI 0.456-1.244, p=0.268). The stone-free rate in groups 1 and 2 was 36.6% and 41.9%, respectively, which did not differ statistically between the groups. However, in groups 1 and 2 perinephric hematoma developed in 23.8% and 43.8% of patients, respectively, which was a statistically significant difference (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The fixed voltage shock wave lithotripsy and ramping protocols provided similar treatment success rates for renal stones. However, the ramping protocol reduced the incidence of perinephric hematoma after shock wave lithotripsy.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi/therapy , Lithotripsy/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hematoma/epidemiology , Hematoma/etiology , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney Calculi/diagnosis , Lithotripsy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
3.
Carcinogenesis ; 32(2): 240-5, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21081469

ABSTRACT

Cigarette smoke is one of the risk factors for gastric cancer and nicotine has been reported to promote tumor growth. Deregulation of microRNA (miRNA) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expressions are hallmarks of many cancers including gastric cancer. Here, we used an miRNA array platform covering a panel of 95 human miRNAs to examine the expression profile in nicotine-treated gastric cancer cells. We found that miR-16 and miR-21 were upregulated upon nicotine stimulation, transfection with anti-miR-16 or anti-miR-21 significantly abrogated cell proliferation. In contrast, ectopic miR-16 or miR-21 expression exhibited a similar stimulatory effect on cell proliferation as nicotine. Nicotine-mediated IkappaBα degradation and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) translocation dose-dependently. Knockdown of NF-κB by short interfering RNA (siRNA) or specific inhibitor (Bay-11-7085) markedly suppressed nicotine-induced cell proliferation and upregulation of miR-16 and miR-21. Interestingly, NF-κB-binding sites were located in both miR-16 and miR-21 gene transcriptional elements and we showed that nicotine enhanced the binding of NF-κB to the promoters of miR-16 and miR-21. Furthermore, activation of COX-2/prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) signaling in response to nicotine was mediated by the action of prostaglandin E receptors (EP2 and EP4). EP2 or EP4 siRNA or antagonists impaired the nicotine-mediated NF-κB activity, upregulation of miR-16 and miR-21 and cell proliferation. Taken together, these results suggest that miR-16 and miR-21 are directly regulated by the transcription factor NF-κB and yet nicotine-promoted cell proliferation is mediated via EP2/4 receptors. Perhaps this study may shed light on the development of anticancer drugs to improve the chemosensitivity in smokers.


Subject(s)
MicroRNAs/physiology , NF-kappa B/physiology , Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP2 Subtype/physiology , Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP4 Subtype/physiology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Humans , Nicotine/pharmacology , Signal Transduction
4.
Oncol Rep ; 20(5): 1093-7, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18949406

ABSTRACT

Our previous study demonstrated that PPARgamma ligand rosiglitazone prevents gastric carcinogenesis in rats induced by chemical carcinogen N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). In this study, we attempted to identify novel anti-cancer mechanisms of rosiglitazone. By examining the gene expression profiles of MNNG-induced and rosiglitazone-treated gastric cancer with Uniset Rat I Bioarray microarray, we identified a gene that showed prominent responses in the rosiglitazone-treated group. The hypertension-related, calcium-regulated gene (HCaRG) was significantly up-regulated in rat gastric carcinoma of the rosiglitazone-treated group when compared with the MNNG group. We further examined HCaRG expression in human gastric cancer and found that the expression of HCaRG was down-regulated in human gastric cancerous tissue. Rosiglitazone markedly induced the expression of HCaRG in the AGS cell line. The up-regulation of HCaRG may be one of the mechanisms underlying the chemopreventive effect of rosiglitazone in gastric cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Nuclear Proteins/drug effects , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Thiazolidinediones/pharmacology , Animals , Cell Cycle Proteins , Cell Line, Tumor , Down-Regulation , Gene Expression , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Methylnitronitrosoguanidine/toxicity , Nuclear Proteins/biosynthesis , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Rats , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Rosiglitazone , Up-Regulation
5.
Carcinogenesis ; 29(8): 1648-54, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18611916

ABSTRACT

Cyclooxoygenase (COX)-2 overexpression is involved in gastric carcinogenesis. While high-salt intake is a known risk factor for gastric cancer development, we determined the effects of high salt on gastric chemical carcinogenesis in COX-2 transgenic (TG) mice. COX-2 TG mice were developed in C57/BL6 strain using the full-length human cox-2 complementary DNA construct. Six-week-old COX-2 TG and wild-type (WT) littermates were randomly allocated to receive alternate week of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU, 240 p.p.m.) in drinking water or control for 10 weeks. Two groups of mice were further treated with 10% NaCl during the initial 10 weeks. All mice were killed at the end of week 50. Both forced COX-2 overexpression and high-salt intake significantly increased the frequency of gastric cancer development in mice as compared with WT littermates treated with MNU alone. However, no additive effect was observed on the combination of high salt and COX-2 expression. We further showed that MNU and high-salt treatment increased chronic inflammatory infiltrates and induced prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) production in the non-cancerous stomach. Whereas high-salt treatment markedly increased the expression of inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, interleukin (IL)-1 beta and IL-6) in the gastric mucosa, COX-2 overexpression significantly altered the cell kinetics in the MNU-induced gastric cancer model. In conclusion, both high salt and COX-2 overexpression promote chemical-induced gastric carcinogenesis, possibly related to chronic inflammation, induction of PGE(2), disruption of cell kinetics and induction of inflammatory cytokines.


Subject(s)
Cyclooxygenase 2/genetics , Methylnitrosourea/toxicity , Sodium Chloride, Dietary/toxicity , Stomach Neoplasms/chemically induced , Stomach Neoplasms/enzymology , Animals , Apoptosis , Cell Division , DNA/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Oviducts/enzymology , Pseudopregnancy/enzymology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
6.
Oncol Rep ; 18(6): 1557-62, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17982644

ABSTRACT

Although selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors suppress cell proliferation in gastric cancer, it remains debatable whether their effect is mediated through COX-2 dependent or independent pathways. We investigated the effects of the targeted inhibition of COX-2 expression by small interfering RNA (siRNA) in human gastric cancer cells and compared it to the effects of treatment with a specific COX-2 inhibitor. COX-2 mRNA and proteins were significantly reduced by up to 80% on day 2 after COX-2 siRNA transfection to the gastric cancer cell line MKN45. Concentrations of prostaglandins E2 (PGE2) in the condition medium were also reduced to 30% after siRNA transfection. Transfection of COX-2 siRNA exhibited a more potent anti-proliferative effect on MKN45 cells than treatment with high-dose (100 microM) NS398. COX-2 siRNA also significantly reduced tumor growth in nude mice. While COX-2 siRNA transfection alone had no obvious pro-apoptotic effects, unlike low-dose (10 microM) NS398 it enhanced the apoptotic reaction of MKN45 cells to cisplatin therapy. In conclusion, our results demonstrate for the first time that COX-2 siRNA inhibits cell growth and enhances the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells. RNA interference may be a promising alternative to specific COX-2 inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer.


Subject(s)
Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Cyclooxygenase 2/genetics , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Humans , Plasmids , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...