The Recovering Quality of Life 10-item (ReQoL-10) scale in a first-episode psychosis population: Validation and implications for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

AIM: This study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the Recovering Quality of Life scale 10-item version (ReQoL-10) using a sample from a Singapore first-episode psychosis intervention program, to explore its clinical and sociodemographic correlates, and to discuss its utility as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). METHODS: Sociodemographic data, duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), and diagnosis were collected from 300 participants. Clinical data, which included baseline and current scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item version, EuroQoL-5 Dimension 3-level version, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning scale, were extracted. The ReQoL-10 was tested for structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, and a multiple linear regression determined if any of the baseline factors were statistically significant predictors of the total ReQoL-10 scores. RESULTS: The mean (SD) total ReQoL-10 score of the sample was 27.8 (7.8). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the bifactor model structure of the ReQoL-10. The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Being older was associated with higher total ReQoL-10 scores, while being married, having a highest educational level of vocational/diploma, longer DUP, and a diagnosis of affective psychosis were associated with lower total ReQoL-10 scores. CONCLUSIONS: This study has validated the ReQoL-10 as suitable for routine use to measure recovery-specific quality of life in a psychiatric setting among patients with first-episode psychosis, and is a potential tool to initiate recovery conversations. As a PROM, it can facilitate shared decision making, in line with efforts to evaluate and improve quality of care.

Development, reliability, and validity of the case management quality of care scale (CMQS) among clients with first episode psychosis.

This paper describes the development and validation of the Case Management Quality Scale (CMQS) to measure the quality of care provided by case managers in an early intervention service for clients with first episode psychosis. A total of 300 client participants from the Singapore Early Psychosis Programme completed a self-administered survey comprising 52 items measuring case management, the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8-item version (CSQ-8), Recovery Self-Assessment - person in recovery version (RSA-R), and Working Alliance Inventory - long form client version (WAI-C), and Recovering Quality of Life 10-item version (ReQoL-10). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the 52-item scale and the items were reduced using criterion validity. Psychometric properties of the 25-item CMQS were tested using internal consistency and concurrent validity. A 2-factor structure of the CMQS was established comprising two subscales - Therapeutic alliance and Care and empowerment. The test of normality for CMQS and subscales was largely found to be within the acceptable range. The Cronbach's alpha for the CMQS scale was high (0.97) and in terms of convergent validity, the CMQS and the two subscales had a moderate correlation with the CSQ-8, RSA-R, and WAI-C (r ranging from 0.596-0.711) and a mild correlation with the ReQoL-10. In conclusion, the CMQS is a user-friendly, and psychometrically sound instrument that is potentially useful for measuring case manager-client therapeutic alliance, and the level of care and empowerment in a case management service.

Case management in early psychosis intervention programme: Perspectives of clients and caregivers.

AIM: This qualitative study explored the perspectives of clients and caregivers on case management provided by the Singapore Early Psychosis Intervention Programme (EPIP), with the intent to understand the salient aspects of case management from their perspective. METHODS: Clients and their caregivers were recruited from the EPIP outpatient clinics. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted at a community centre outside the hospital with 47 clients and 19 caregivers. Facilitators were experienced researchers who were not involved in the care of the clients and trained in qualitative research methodologies. All FGDs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim with all participants' identifiers omitted to protect confidentiality. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were 11 themes that emerged from the FGDs: therapeutic alliance, holistic monitoring, collaborative role with other care providers, counselling and guidance, crisis management, bridging role, client-centred care, client empowerment and strength building, psychoeducation/education on illness, support and problem solving. "Problem solving" surfaced only from the client FGDs; the remaining themes were common to both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The voices of clients and caregivers are important to EPIP case management service. This study has provided insights into their perspectives, understandings and lived experiences of case management and its impact on clients and caregivers.