Change in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is Associated With Local Failure After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: Response assessment with computed tomography after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is challenging because myriad anatomic changes can occur after treatment. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide additional data to guide therapy response. The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of SBRT on the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a prospective clinical study of patients with NSCLC who received SBRT to the primary lung lesion. Patients underwent MRI scans before and at 1 month after completion of SBRT. MRI consisted of T1- and T2-weighted sequences, along with postcontrast, dynamic-contrast, and diffusion-weighted sequences with construction of ADC maps. Two blinded radiologists generated the ADC. SBRT was given over 5 fractions. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were enrolled. Twelve patients were eligible for analysis. An average increase of 50% and 46% in mean single-plane ADC was observed after treatment by readers 1 and 2, respectively (P < .01, both reviewers). There was good interobserver agreement of single-plane ADC values between the 2 radiologists (Pearson correlation of 0.85 [baseline] and 0.89 [1-month post-SBRT], P < .001 for both). There was also a significant 18% increase in mean volumetric ADC on the 1-month scan (Wilcoxon P = .02). Two patients developed a local failure after SBRT, 1 at 6 months and the other at 34 months. Using a threshold of volumetric ADC increase of greater than 40%, 2 of 2 patients demonstrated local failure compared with 0 of 10 patients below this limit. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant increase in ADC was observed 1 month after treatment. An ADC increase of 40% at 1 month was associated with a higher rate of local failure. This pilot study provides impetus for studying ADC as a radiomic biomarker in patients receiving lung SBRT for NSCLC.

Accuracy of computed tomography in nodal staging of colon cancer patients.

AIM: To predict node-positive disease in colon cancer using computed tomography (CT). METHODS: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I-III colon cancer patients who underwent curavtive-intent colectomy between 2007-2010 were identified at a single comprehensive cancer center. All patients had preoperative CT scans with original radiology reports from referring institutions. CT images underwent blinded secondary review by a surgeon and a dedicated abdominal radiologist at our institution to identify pericolonic lymph nodes (LNs). Comparison of outside CT reports to our independent imaging review was performed in order to highlight differences in detection in actual clinical practice. CT reviews were compared with final pathology. Results of the outside radiologist review, secondary radiologist review, and surgeon review were compared with the final pathologic exam to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false positive and negative rates, and accuracy of each review. Exclusion criteria included evidence of metastatic disease on CT, rectal or appendiceal involvement, or absence of accompanying imaging from referring institutions. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2010, 64 stageI-III colon cancer patients met the eligibility criteria of our study. The mean age of the cohort was 68 years, and 26 (41%) patients were male and 38 (59%) patients were female. On final pathology, 26 of 64 (40.6%) patients had node-positive (LN+) disease and 38 of 64 (59.4%) patients had node-negative (LN-) disease. Outside radiologic review demonstrated sensitivity of 54% (14 of 26 patients) and specificity of 66% (25 of 38 patients) in predicting LN+ disease, whereas secondary radiologist review demonstrated 88% (23 of 26) sensitivity and 58% (22 of 38) specificity. On surgeon review, sensitivity was 69% (18 of 26) with 66% specificity (25 of 38). Secondary radiology review demonstrated the highest accuracy (70%) and the lowest false negative rate (12%), compared to the surgeon review at 67% accuracy and 31% false negative rate and the outside radiology review at 61% accuracy and 46% false negative rate. CONCLUSION: CT LN staging of colon cancer has moderate accuracy, with administration of NCT based on CT potentially resulting in overtreatment. Active search for LN+ may improve sensitivity at the cost of specificity.

Performance of multidetector computed tomographic angiography in determining surgical resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) in assessing the surgical resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, radiographic, surgical, and pathological records of 203 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were imaged with MDCT scanners using our institution's CTA pancreatic protocol. Images were compared with surgical outcomes to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MDCTA in determining resectability. RESULTS: Data were analyzed twice, once with equivocal findings on MDCTA assumed as resectable and again with equivocal cases assumed as unresectable. All equivocal cases were ultimately unresectable; when this was assumed, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were determined to be 100%, 71%, 85%,100% and 89%. Twelve patients deemed resectable by preoperative MDCTA were found to be unresectable on surgical exploration owing to vascular involvement (n = 4), liver metastases (n = 4), and peritoneal involvement (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector CT angiography offers accurate and valuable preoperative assessment of surgical resectability of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Liver and peritoneal metastases and vascular invasion still remain important pitfalls in preoperative evaluation.

Surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CTA.

Imaging studies play an important role in the diagnosis and management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) is the most widely available and best validated modality for imaging these patients. Meticulous technique following a well-designed pancreas protocol is essential for maximizing the diagnostic efficacy of CT. After the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is made, the key to management is staging to determine resectability. In practice, staging often entails predicting the presence or absence of vascular invasion by tumor, for which several radiologic grading systems exist. With advances in surgical techniques, the definition of resectability is in evolution, and it is crucial that radiologists have an understanding of the implications of findings that are relevant to the determination of resectability.

Pelvic and scrotal trauma: CT and triage of patients.

Traumatic dislocation of the testicles was first reported during crush injury but is now more commonly related to motor vehicle accidents. Approximately 55 cases had been reported by 2003. Virtually no papers discuss the role of CT in the rapid diagnosis of penoscrotal trauma, although most polytrauma or "pelvic trauma" patients are rapidly evaluated by CT in the emergency room setting. As more patients with pelvic trauma are triaged and evaluated using CT scanners with greater multidetector capability, more patients will be seen with testicular injury. It is important for the emergency physicians, radiologists, and traumatologists not to overlook unsuspected cases of penoscrotal injury which are typically initially evaluated by history, physical exam, and ultrasound. We describe a recent case of initial diagnosis of bilateral testicular dislocation from blunt trauma using modern multidetector CT imaging technique.

Staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by imaging studies.

Imaging studies play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography (CT) is the most widely available and best-validated modality for imaging patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. To maximize the diagnostic efficacy of CT, use of a pancreas protocol is mandatory. The sensitivity of CT for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (89%-97%) and its positive predictive value for predicting unresectability (89%-100%) are high. The positive predictive value of CT for predicting resectability (45%-79%) is low because the diagnostic criteria for diagnosing vascular invasion by tumor favors specificity over sensitivity to avoid denying surgery to patients with potentially resectable tumor. Furthermore, the sensitivity of CT for small hepatic and peritoneal metastases is limited. Magnetic resonance imaging has not been shown to perform better than CT for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but can be helpful as an adjunct to CT, particularly for evaluation of small hepatic lesions that cannot be fully characterized by CT. Ultrasound is often the first study obtained in patients with obstructive jaundice or unexplained abdominal pain, but its utility for diagnosis and staging of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma is limited. Positron emission tomography/CT combines the functional information provided by positron emission tomography with the anatomic information provided by CT and is a promising modality for imaging of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but its utility has not been established. Endoscopic ultrasound is generally considered superior to CT for the diagnosis and local staging of pancreatic cancer, but is limited by availability and inability to assess for distant metastases.