Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 45(5): 198-204, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27383719

ABSTRACT

This study assessed the effectiveness of education reforms on student-reported learning outcomes at the end of the 5-year medical school (M5) and 1-year internship (HO) in 2006, 2007 and 2008. A self-administered anonymous survey with 17 learning outcomes assessed, derived from Harden's Three-Circle Outcomes Model for outcomes-based education, was administered to 683 students at the end of medical school (M5) and internship (HO) from 2006, 2007 and 2008. We identified learning outcomes which changed significantly for internship (Cohorts A, B and C) and medical school (Cohorts B, C and D) between cohorts from 2006 to 2008, and compared learning outcomes between medical school and internship within cohorts (i.e. Cohort B which was M5 in 2006 and HO in 2007; Cohort C which was M5 in 2007 and HO in 2008). The proportion of students who agreed that medical school helped them achieve learning outcomes increased significantly from 2006 to 2008 for 15 out of 17 learning outcomes assessed. The proportion of students who agreed that internship helped them achieve learning outcomes increased significantly from 2006 to 2008 for 6 learning outcomes assessed. For Cohorts B and C, internship was more effective than medical school in achieving 8 learning outcomes. Cohort C reported that internship was more effective than medical school in 3 additional learning outcomes than Cohort B: patient management, humility and dedication. We conclude that a successful journey of education reform is an ongoing process that needs to comprehensively address multifaceted components such as faculty, administration and curriculum.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Internship and Residency , Schools, Medical , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Humans , Singapore , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 29 Suppl 2: 11-3, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12887944

ABSTRACT

The current practice of clinicians worldwide in the treatment of venous thromboembolism was assessed via responses to the FRONTLINE survey. Significant regional differences in practice were noted. Use of low-molecular-weight heparin was reported as the most common initial treatment for venous thromboembolism, although, in North America, unfractionated heparin was widely used to treat surgical cancer patients after a thrombotic episode. Oral anticoagulants were favoured for long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism, particularly in Western Europe and North America. Case study reports from the survey revealed that a substantial proportion of patients with cancer had been perceived to be at low risk of thrombosis, had consequently not received thromboprophylaxis and developed VTE.


Subject(s)
Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/complications , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control , Attitude of Health Personnel , Europe , Health Care Surveys , Humans , North America , Physicians
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...