A year of COVID-19: Effects of a global pandemic on a hip fracture bundled care protocol.

Introduction: Our aim was to analyse how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affects a hip fracture bundled care protocol. We hypothesised that key performance indicators, but not short-term outcomes, may be adversely affected. Methods: Patients admitted under a hip fracture bundled care protocol were divided into two arms: 'COVID' group included patients admitted in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic and 'PRE-COVID' group included patients admitted in 2019. We retrospectively analysed time to admission, time to surgery, length of stay, discharge disposition, as well as rates of 30-day revision surgery, 30-day readmission and inpatient mortality. Results: There were 307 patients in the PRE-COVID group and 350 patients in the COVID group. There was no significant difference in terms of gender, age and type of hip fracture. The COVID group had a higher proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III and IV patients (61.4% vs. 50.2% in the PRE-COVID group; P = 0.004). In the COVID group, similar proportion of patients were admitted to the ward within 4 h, but the mean time to surgery was longer (71.8 ± 73.0 h vs. 60.4 ± 72.8 h in the PRE-COVID group; P = 0.046) and few patients underwent operations within 48 h (41.7% vs. 60.3% in the PRE-COVID group; P < 0.001). Mean postoperative length of stay, discharge disposition, as well as rates of inpatient mortality, 30-day revision surgery and 30-day readmission were similar. Conclusion: The volume of hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic remained unchanged, although patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be more deconditioned. Nevertheless, having robust protocols and staff familiar with hip fracture treatment can preserve short-term outcomes for this group of patients, even with strict isolation measures in place during a pandemic.

Bone-on-Bone Contact on Radiograph is not a Prerequisite for Successful Outcome in Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty-A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients without bone-on-bone osteoarthritis are excluded from mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty due to higher revision rates and poorer outcomes. However, we do not know if the same indication applies to fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty implants. Our study aims to compare functional outcomes and revision rates in patients with and without bone-on-bone arthritis undergoing fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 153 fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in a single institution. Patients were divided into four groups based on joint space remaining measured on preoperative radiographs. Group 1 included knees with bone-on-bone contact; group 2 included knees with less than 2 mm joint space; group 3 included knees with 2 to 4 mm joint space; group 4 included knees with more than 4 mm joint space. Patients were followed up for 10 years postoperatively and assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, the Functional Score and Knee Score from the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey. RESULTS: There was no difference in terms of demographic data and preoperative scores. Postoperative Knee Society Functional Score was found to be lower in group 1 as compared with the other groups. There was no difference between the four groups of patients in terms of Knee Society Knee Score, Oxford Knee Score, and Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary Scores from the Short Form 36 Health Survey. There was no difference in terms of survivorship free from all-cause revision at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients with varying degrees of arthritis on preoperative radiographs had comparable clinical outcomes. We conclude that symptomatic patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of medial compartment osteoarthritis of any grade can benefit from a fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Lower socioeconomic status is associated with increased co-morbidity burden and independently associated with time to surgery, length of hospitalisation, and readmission rates of hip fracture patients.

This study examines the relationship between socioeconomic status, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes of hip fracture patients. Lower socioeconomic status is not only associated with poorer comorbidities but is also independently impacting surgical access and outcomes. This can be considered a "double setback" in the management of hip fractures. PURPOSE: The effect of socioeconomic status on hip fracture outcomes remains controversial. We examine the relationship between SES and patient comorbidity, care access, and clinical outcomes of surgically managed hip fracture patients. METHODS: Using healthcare payor status as a surrogate for SES, patients operated for fragility hip fractures between 2013 and 2016 were dichotomised based on payor status, namely private healthcare (PRIV) versus subsidised healthcare (SUB). PRIV patients were compared with SUB patients in terms of demographic data, ASA scores, co-morbidity burden (Charlson comorbidity index, CCI), time to surgery, length of acute hospitalisation, and 90-day readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients in group PRIV and 1146 patients in group SUB were included. SUB patients had a higher mean Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) (p = 0.01), a longer length of hospitalisation (p = 0.001), an increased delay in surgery (p = 0.005), and higher 90-day readmission rates (p = 0.013). Lower SES (p = 0.01), older age (p = 0.01), higher CCI (p < 0.01), and a higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (ASA) (p = 0.03) were predictive of time to surgery. Lower SES (p = 0.02) and higher CCI (p < 0.001) were predictive of the length of hospitalisation. Lower SES (p = 0.04) and higher CCI (p < 0.001) were predictive of 90-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Low SES is associated with higher CCI in surgically treated hip fracture patients. However, it is independently associated with slower access to surgery, a longer hospital stay, and higher readmission rates. Hence, lower SES, with its associated higher CCI and independent impact on surgical access and outcomes, can be considered a "double setback" in the management of fragility hip fractures.

The psychological impact on an orthopaedic outpatient setting in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: World Health Organization declared coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) a global pandemic on 11 March 2020, after the coronavirus claimed 4628 lives worldwide. Mental health challenges such as making impossible decisions and working under extreme pressures are expected to be faced by frontline healthcare workers who are directly involved in the care of COVID-19 patients. However, we question if significant stress levels might also be observed in a subspecialty musculoskeletal outpatient department, where staff are not first-line care providers of COVID-19 patients. We hypothesize that these healthcare workers also face significant psychological strain, and we aim to objectively determine the prevalence using a validated caregiver strain index. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatient musculoskeletal clinics in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. We collected basic demographic data and used a 13-question tool adapted from the validated Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) to measure psychological strain in these healthcare workers. Participants were divided into 2 groups depending on the level of strain experienced. RESULTS: A total of 62 healthcare workers volunteered for this study. There were 32 participants (51.6%) who had 7 or more positive responses (group 1) and the remaining 30 participants (48.4%) were allocated to group 2. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data. "Work adjustments" (74.2%), "changes in personal plans" (72.6%), and finding it "confining" (72.6%) garnered the most positive responses in the questionnaire. On the other hand, "financial concerns" garnered the least positive responses (21.0%). CONCLUSION: The protracted duration of the COVID-19 outbreak and its resultant prolonged adjustments can have unintended consequences of wearing down healthcare resources otherwise allocated to chronic and elective conditions. Countries should ensure that measures are put in place to safeguard the mental well-being of our healthcare workers to avoid needing another reactive strategy in this battle against COVID-19.

Results of Hallux Valgus Surgery in Diabetic Patients With Good Glycemic Control.

BACKGROUND: Literature is sparse on whether diabetes affects outcomes of hallux valgus surgery. With the rising global prevalence of diabetes and diabetes being an independent predictor of poorer outcomes, particularly in foot and ankle surgery, we aimed to investigate the impact of diabetes on the outcomes of hallux valgus surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study of prospectively collected registry data of 951 feet in 721 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic hallux valgus between 2007 and 2015 at our institution. All patients with diabetes were identified and matched with patients without diabetes for age, sex, and body mass index in a 1:2 ratio to construct the matched cohorts for analysis. Glycemic control in the diabetic cohort was assessed using preoperative HbA1c. The primary outcome measure was complication rates. Secondary outcomes were (1) deformity correction using the hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles; (2) patient-reported outcomes using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical and Mental Health subscales, and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores; (3) patient satisfaction; and (4) reoperation rates up to 2 years postoperatively. Forty diabetic patients were identified and matched to 80 nondiabetic patients. Although matching was only performed for age, sex, and body mass index, the diabetic and the nondiabetic cohorts were also similar in hallux valgus severity, preoperative scores, and types of procedures performed. RESULTS: The mean preoperative HbA1c in our diabetic cohort was 7.1%. Both the diabetic and nondiabetic cohorts showed excellent AOFAS and VAS scores with no differences in degree of deformity correction, complication profiles, reoperation rates, outcome scores, and satisfaction at both 6 months and 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: We believe stringent patient selection was key to reduced complication rates and good outcomes in diabetic patients. Well-selected diabetic patients remain suitable candidates for hallux valgus surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Diabetes mellitus does not negatively impact outcomes and satisfaction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in well-controlled disease.

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained popularity in recent years in view of its minimally invasive nature and proven benefits over the traditional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of superior knee range of motion and kinametics, faster recovery, lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay and ease of revision with the preservation of bone stock.With the increasing incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) worldwide and an increased risk of deep infection, wound complications and early failure previously shown in diabetic patients undergoing TKA, it is prudent that we establish the impact of DM on the outcomes and complications of UKA given that there is little on the topic in the current literature.This is especially significant in Asia as Asia is home to more than 60% of the world's population of diabetic patients with estimates of more than 200 million people having the condition. Type 2 DM in particular, is an increasing epidemic with projections to increase by more than 150% between year 2000 and 2035.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes and satisfaction of UKA at 2 years postoperatively. We hypothesize that diabetes mellitus does not affect the outcomes and satisfaction following UKA in Asians at 2 years postoperatively. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected registry data of 1075 UKAs performed in a multiethnic Asian population between 2006 and 2013 at our institution. Outcomes assessed included flexion range, Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and satisfaction scores.All patients with DM were identified and matched with patients without DM for age, gender and body mass index. Outcomes, satisfaction, complication and revision rates were then compared between the two groups up to 2 years postoperatively. Preoperative HbA1c was used to assess the patients' blood glucose control in the DM group. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (9.7%) had DM, close to the national prevalence (11.3%). At 2 years postoperatively, DM patients had better improvement in their SF-36 Mental Component Score (MCS) (p = 0.015) despite poorer preoperative scores (DM group = 70 ±â€¯23, non-DM group = 77 ±â€¯17, p = 0.013), and were in 1° more varus (p = 0.005) when compared to patients without DM.There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference for knee-specific outcomes (DM:90%, non-DM:96%) or the satisfaction rates between the groups (DM:92%, non-DM:94%). Complication rates were similar (DM:5.8%, non-DM:4.8%). There were no venous thromboembolic events, deaths or revisions during the follow-up period in both groups. The mean preoperative HbA1c in our DM group was 6.6%. CONCLUSION: In this matched-pair study of diabetic versus non-diabetic patients undergoing surgery for UKA, DM does not have a clinically significant negative impact on the outcomes and satisfaction following UKA in patients with well-controlled disease.