Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 38(11): 1977-1982, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36164761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrate the association of the gut microbiome in regulating interactions between the central nervous system and intestinal function. Individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been shown to have unique gut microbial signature, with depletion of beneficial commensal microbes. Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) restores the imbalanced gut microbiome and may replete missing microbes to increase production of hormones and neurotransmitters regulating human behavior and cognition. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODS: Here, we present an interesting case of a 22-year-old woman treated with FMT primarily to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection, which coincidentally alleviated her ADHD symptoms. We also present the pre- and post-FMT gut microbiota profiles conducted using shotgun metagenomic sequencing on the patient's fecal samples to thereby highlight potential microbial-associated mechanisms associated with the relief of ADHD symptoms. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Our case report provides preliminary evidence regarding the use of FMT in a patient with C. difficile and ADHD. We speculate that gut microbiome modulation, in particular the gain or loss of specific microbial species and pathways involving the metabolism of SCFAs, tryptophan and GABA, may merit further exploration as a potential therapeutic strategy for ADHD.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/therapy , Feces
2.
Surg Endosc ; 36(5): 3308-3316, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34327547

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is gaining traction as a minimally invasive treatment of achalasia. Increased reflux is reported after POEM but the incidence, type and severity of reflux are not fully understood. We aimed to study the prevalence and nature of reflux after POEM and correlate reflux with endoscopy and pH-impedance findings. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of achalasia patients undergoing POEM since 2014. Data from Eckardt and GERD symptom scores, high-resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) and gastroscopy were performed pre-procedure and repeated at 1-year follow-up. Data from 24-h pH-impedance, if performed, were also recorded. A standardized questionnaire was used to determine the severity and frequency of heartburn symptoms and the composite score for each patient was calculated. RESULTS: 58 patients underwent POEM between January 2014 and October 2018. The efficacy of POEM at 1 year was 93.0%. We observed reduction of median Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) from 23.5 ± 33.1 mmHg to 13.4 ± 7.71 mmHg (p = 0.005) and mean Eckardt score improved from 6.09 ± 2.43 points to 1.16 ± 1.70 points (p < 0.001). At 1 year, 43.1% (n = 25) had symptomatic reflux. Of the 40 patients who underwent repeated gastroscopy, 60.0% (n = 24) had endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis with seven patients (18%) diagnosed with Grade C or D oesophagitis. 43.1% (n = 25) of patients had pH-impedance done post-POEM off PPIs. 14 patients (56%) had increased acid exposure. Sixteen percent of reflux episodes were acidic and 77.3% were weakly acidic. CONCLUSION: POEM was an effective treatment for achalasia. However, GERD was common after POEM with incidence of 43% on symptom score, 60% on endoscopy and 56% on pH-impedance test. Post-POEM reflux appeared to be predominantly acidic in nature. Routine surveillance for GERD after POEM is recommended.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia , Esophagitis, Peptic , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Myotomy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Esophageal Achalasia/diagnosis , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/surgery , Esophagitis, Peptic/etiology , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/etiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Humans , Myotomy/adverse effects , Myotomy/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
JGH Open ; 5(8): 855-863, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34386592

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the proceedings from the first consensus meeting on the management of mild-to-moderate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the Southeast Asian (SEA) region. Seventeen statements were drawn up by a steering committee that focused on epidemiology, mechanism of action, diagnostic investigations, and treatment. Voting on the recommendations used the Delphi method with two rounds of voting among the 10 panel members. The consensus panel agreed that GERD is mostly a mild disease in the SEA region with predominantly non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Complicated GERD and Barrett's esophagus are infrequently seen. The panel recommended endoscopy in patients with alarm or refractory symptoms but cautioned that the incidence of gastric cancer is higher in SEA. pH and impedance measurements were not recommended for routine assessment. The acid pocket is recognized as an important pathogenic factor in GERD. Lifestyle measures such as weight reduction, avoidance of smoking, reduction of alcohol intake, and elevation of the head of the bed were recommended but strict avoidance of specific foods or drinks was not. Alginates was recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate GERD while recognizing that proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) remained the mainstay of treatment of GERD. The use of alginates was also recommended as adjunctive therapy when GERD symptoms were only partially responsive to PPIs.

4.
Surg Endosc ; 32(3): 1377-1381, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28812156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy remains a critical component of General Surgery and Gastroenterology training. Whilst residents need to gain experience, the quality of endoscopy which patients receive cannot be compromised. We conducted this study to compare quality indicators between consultants and residents with regards to colonoscopy. METHODS: A review of colonoscopies from a prospectively collected database was performed from September 2011 to February 2016. Quality indicators such as caecum intubation rate, adenoma detection rate, adherence to a 6-min withdrawal rule, mean number of polyps detected per colonoscope, and complications were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In total, out of 25,749 colonoscopies that were performed, 14,168 (55.0%) were performed by Consultants. Consultants achieved a better caecum intubation rate compared with residents (96.0% vs 94.9%, p < 0.001), and were more compliant to the 6-min withdrawal rule (74.7% vs 68.6%, p < 0.001). There were, however, no statistically significant differences in the adenoma detection rate (33.5% vs 34.5%, p = 0.098). Bleeding was a rare complication that was encountered more frequently in colonoscopies performed by consultants than for residents (0.002% vs 0.00008%, p < 0.001). There were only three (%) perforations in the entire series, and all were from colonoscopies performed by Consultants. CONCLUSION: Given the proper training, residents are able to perform colonoscopy with the same level of competence as consultants. Whilst colonoscopic related complications are often tied to the difficulty of the procedures, the adherence to the 6-min withdrawal rule must be reinforced and continually educated to both residents and consultants.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Colonoscopy/standards , Internship and Residency , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Adenoma/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Consultants , Credentialing , Female , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Humans , Intestinal Perforation/epidemiology , Intraoperative Complications , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Singapore/epidemiology , Young Adult
5.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(10): 2492-8, 2014 Mar 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24627586

ABSTRACT

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder characterized by recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort, in combination with disturbed bowel habits in the absence of identifiable organic cause. Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) is a hormone produced by the pineal gland and also large number by enterochromaffin cells of the digestive mucosa. Melatonin plays an important part in gastrointestinal physiology which includes regulation of gastrointestinal motility, local anti-inflammatory reaction as well as moderation of visceral sensation. Melatonin is commonly given orally. It is categorized by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a dietary supplement. Melatonin treatment has an extremely wide margin of safety though it may cause minor adverse effects, such as headache, rash and nightmares. Melatonin was touted as a potential effective candidate for IBS treatment. Putative role of melatonin in IBS treatment include analgesic effects, regulator of gastrointestinal motility and sensation to sleep promoter. Placebo-controlled studies in melatonin suffered from heterogeneity in methodology. Most studies utilized 3 mg at bedtime as the standard dose of trial. However, all studies had consistently showed improvement in abdominal pain, some showed improvement in quality of life of IBS patients. Melatonin is a relatively safe drug that possesses potential in treating IBS. Future studies should focus on melatonin effect on gut mobility as well as its central nervous system effect to elucidate its role in IBS patients.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Intestines/drug effects , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/drug therapy , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Abdominal Pain/drug therapy , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Animals , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Intestines/physiopathology , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/metabolism , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/physiopathology , Melatonin/adverse effects , Melatonin/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL