ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To understand the lived experience of adults with overweight/obesity and early type 2 diabetes in a modern urban environment, and the interrelations among the various aspects of these experiences and participants' attitudes to weight management. DESIGN: Qualitative inductive approach to analysing data thematically from semistructured interviews and interpreted from a socioecological perspective. SETTING: Primary care clinics located in northern and central Singapore. PARTICIPANTS: 21 patients between 29 and 59 years old who are living with overweight/obese (Body Mass Index of 25.3-44.0kg/m2) and type 2 diabetes for 6 years or less. RESULTS: The main themes - everyday life, people around me and within me - pointed to a combination of barriers to weight and health management for participants. These included environmental factors such as easy physical and digital access to unhealthy food, and high-stress work environments; social factors such as ambiguous family support and dietary practices of peers; and individual factors such as challenges with self-regulation, prioritising work, dealing with co-existing medical conditions and the emotional significance of food. While lack of motivation and cultural dietary practices are hard to change, a problem-solving attitude, and presence of role models, may enable behaviour change. CONCLUSION: An exploration of the lifeworld of patients with overweight/obese and early type 2 diabetes revealed that work demands, dietary practices in the workplace and at home, and the easy availability of calorie-dense foods afforded by a technology-infused environment hindered the individual's efforts at maintaining a healthy weight and lifestyle. Policy and initiatives promoting work-life balance as well as individualised interventions can support participants' stress management, and problem-solving capability for behaviour change. These barriers stemmed from the various domains of the environmental, interpersonal and intrapersonal but were interrelated. They underscored the need for an integrated approach to weight and diabetes management.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Obesity , Overweight , Qualitative Research , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Singapore , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Adult , Obesity/psychology , Overweight/psychology , Interviews as TopicABSTRACT
AIM: Diabetes in young adulthood has been associated with poor outcomes. Self-management is fundamental to good diabetes care, and self-management interventions have been found to improve outcomes in older adults. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of self-management interventions in young adults (aged 15-39 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We searched five databases and two clinical trial registries from 2003 to February 2019, without language restrictions. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of self-management interventions with usual care or enhanced usual care in young adults. Outcomes of interest included clinical outcomes, psychological health, self-care behaviours, diabetes knowledge and self-efficacy. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model and quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. We followed Cochrane gold standard systematic review methodology and reported this systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered with PROSEPRO (CRD42018110868). RESULTS: In total, 13 studies (1002 participants) were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference between self-management interventions and controls in post-intervention HbA1c levels, BMI, depression, diabetes-related distress, overall self-care, diabetes knowledge and self-efficacy. Quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate due to study limitations, inconsistency and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: Current self-management interventions did not improve outcomes in young adults with diabetes. Our findings, which contrast with those from systematic reviews in older adults, highlight the need for the development of more effective interventions for young adults with diabetes.
