Awake versus Asleep Anesthesia in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical therapy for patients with Parkinsons' Disease (PD). Traditionally, DBS surgery for PD is performed under local anesthesia, whereby the patient is awake to facilitate intraoperative neurophysiological confirmation of the intended target using microelectrode recordings. General anesthesia allows for improved patient comfort without sacrificing anatomic precision and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a systemic review and meta-analysis on patients undergoing DBS for PD. Published randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies, and case series which compared asleep and awake techniques for patients undergoing DBS for PD were included. A total of 19 studies and 1,900 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed the (i) clinical effectiveness - postoperative UPDRS III score, levodopa equivalent daily doses and DBS stimulation requirements. (ii) Surgical and anesthesia related complications, number of lead insertions and operative time (iii) patient's quality of life, mood and cognitive measures using PDQ-39, MDRS, and MMSE scores. There was no significant difference in results between the awake and asleep groups, other than for operative time, for which there was significant heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: With the advent of newer technology, there is likely to have narrowing differences in outcomes between awake or asleep DBS. What would therefore be more important would be to consider the patient's comfort and clinical status as well as the operative team's familiarity with the procedure to ensure seamless transition and care.

Local anesthesia versus general anesthesia for surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The optimal anesthetic technique for surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is still uncertain. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if local anesthesia with or without sedation (LA) or general anesthesia (GA) results in better outcomes for surgical drainage of CSDH. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective studies that compared GA vs LA for adult patients undergoing surgical drainage of CSDH and reported at least one outcome of interest. Primary outcomes of interest included total duration of surgery, recurrence rate, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative adverse events, postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Eight studies (1,542 patients; 926 LA; 616 GA) were included-two were RCTs and six were observational studies. Pooling the estimates of all available studies, we found that LA was associated with a decreased mean LOS by about two days (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.47 to -0.77; P = 0.01; low certainty of evidence) as well as a lower risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.58; P = 0.004; very low certainty of evidence). There was no significant difference in terms of duration of surgery, recurrence rate, intraoperative adverse events, or mortality. The quality of the observational studies was poor to fair, largely because of heterogeneity among the studies. Among the RCTs, one had a low risk of bias and one was deemed to be at high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthesia with/without sedation for surgical drainage of CSDH may be associated with a shorter LOS, and lower postoperative complications. As most of our included studies were observational in nature, our results should be interpreted as summaries of unadjusted group comparisons. In view of the low certainty of evidence, higher quality evidence is required to corroborate these findings. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022333388); first submitted 1 June 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La technique anesthésique optimale pour le drainage chirurgical de l'hématome sous-dural chronique (HSDC) demeure incertaine. Nous avons réalisé cette revue systématique et méta-analyse pour déterminer si l'anesthésie locale (AL) avec ou sans sédation ou l'anesthésie générale (AG) entraînait de meilleurs devenirs suite à un drainage chirurgical de l'HSDC. MéTHODE: Nous avons effectué des recherches dans les bases de données PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, le registre central Cochrane des études contrôlées et ClinicalTrials.gov afin d'en extraire les études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) et les études prospectives ou rétrospectives qui comparaient l'AG à l'AL chez une patientèle adulte bénéficiant d'un drainage chirurgical de l'HSDC et qui rapportaient au moins un résultat d'intérêt. Les critères d'évaluation principaux d'intérêt comprenaient la durée totale de la chirurgie, le taux de récidive et la durée du séjour à l'hôpital. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient les événements indésirables peropératoires, les complications postopératoires et la mortalité postopératoire. RéSULTATS: Huit études (1542 patients, 926 AL, 616 AG) ont été incluses, dont deux ERC et six études observationnelles. En regroupant les estimations de toutes les études disponibles, nous avons constaté que l'AL était associée à une diminution de la durée moyenne de séjour d'environ deux jours (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, −3,47 à −0,77; P = 0,01; faible certitude des données probantes) ainsi qu'à un risque plus faible de complications postopératoires (rapport de cotes, 0,31; IC 95 %, 0,17 à 0,58; P = 0,004; très faible certitude des données probantes). Il n'y avait pas de différence significative en termes de durée de la chirurgie, ni de taux de récidive, d'événements indésirables peropératoires ou de mortalité. La qualité des études observationnelles était médiocre à passable, en grande partie en raison de l'hétérogénéité entre les études. Parmi les ERC, l'une présentait un faible risque de biais et l'autre a été considérée comme présentant un risque élevé de biais. CONCLUSION: L'anesthésie locale avec ou sans sédation pour le drainage chirurgical de l'HSDC peut être associée à une durée de séjour hospitalier plus courte et à des complications postopératoires plus faibles. Étant donné que la plupart des études incluses étaient de nature observationnelle, nos résultats doivent être interprétés comme des résumés de comparaisons de groupes non ajustées. Compte tenu de la faible certitude des données probantes, des données de meilleure qualité sont nécessaires pour corroborer ces conclusions. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42022333388); soumis pour la première fois le 1er juin 2022.

Anaesthesia Management for Neurosurgery in a Patient With Congenital Lung Agenesis.

Congenital lung agenesis is a rare congenital abnormality associated with an absence or under-development of either one or both lungs, and its presentation in adulthood is even rarer. We describe a 40-year-old female patient with a history of congenital agenesis of the right lung and a high-grade glioma in the frontal region of the brain presenting for craniotomy and excision of the tumor in an MRI suite. Lung protective strategies of ventilation were utilized intraoperatively. The remote location of the MRI suite made access to extra manpower support challenging. The patient was managed uneventfully and discharged stable to the high-dependency unit. Our case describes how congenital lung agenesis poses a unique set of challenges for anaesthetic management, particularly in neurosurgical patients, and provides guidance to a multidisciplinary team approach.

Optimal reproductive allocation in annuals and an informational constraint on plasticity.

In this computational study, we examined optimal reproductive allocation schedules in annual plants whose season lengths vary in predictability. We discuss relationships among season-length predictability, the form of the optimal allocation schedule, the degree of plasticity reflected in the optimal reaction norm, and the competitive consequences of plasticity and bet-hedging. We used an evolutionary algorithm to search the allocation-schedule space for optima, given different distributions of season length. The resulting schedules maximize geometric-mean fecundity under their selecting distributions. We then examined the relative fitness of these schedules in simulated competition among reaction norms optimized for different degrees of season-length predictability. Gradedness of optimal schedules decreases with increasing season-length predictability, and reaction norms comprising highly graded schedules reflect lesser plasticity than norms comprising schedules that are less graded. In simulations, competitively successful genotypes were those that reflected plasticity appropriate to the season-length predictability. Informational constraints in the form of low season-length predictability select for low plasticity and high bet-hedging in allocation. Because an environmental cue must mediate the relationship between environment and fitness, plasticity in reproductive allocation ought to be understood not as a direct response to the selective environment, but rather to cues that are correlated with relevant environmental parameters.

Anesthetic management for a five-day separation of craniopagus twins.

UNLABELLED: Craniopagus twinning is a rare form of the already uncommon entity of conjoint twins. With advances in medical technology and expertise, future attempts at surgical separation of these increasingly complex cases are likely to occur. Despite this, medical literature on the anesthetic management of these cases is sparse. The following case report details the anesthetic management and planning leading to and including the 5-dy separation of 11-mo-old craniopagus twins. The report emphasizes the importance of teamwork, communication, and advanced planning required in cases such as this. IMPLICATIONS: The following case report documents the anesthetic planning and management leading to and including a 5-day separation of twins joined at the head. This case report also details the difficulties encountered during the unique combination of a rarely performed procedure and a long operating time.