ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia has been purported to be a pre-operative risk factor that affects patient outcomes in oncological surgery, but no study as of yet has investigated the effect of sarcopenia in patients with spinal tumours. Psoas muscle measurements, including the psoas muscle index (PMI), are an objective way to determine sarcopenia. OBJECTIVES: We investigated if PMI could predict post-operative outcomes (length of hospital stay and post-operative complications) in surgically treated spinal tumour patients in a multi-ethnic Asian population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with spinal tumours who underwent surgery at our tertiary institution from January 2016 to January 2020. PMI was measured on T2-weighted MRI sequences, at the middle of the L3 vertebral body and measurements were collected by 2 independent raters. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS), and the secondary outcome was post-operative complications. ROC curve was used to attain the cut-off value for PMI and the population was then stratified into 2 groups; sarcopenic if PMI was less than 1.22 and non-sarcopenic if the PMI value was more than or equal to 1.22. Multivariable linear regression was used for LOS, while multivariate logistic regression was used for complications. RESULTS: 57 patients were included with a mean length of stay of 17.8 days (SD 25.1) and the total number of patients with complications were 20 (35.1 %). Mean LOS was significantly higher in the sarcopenic group compared to the non-sarcopenic group. Univariate analysis confirmed the association of lower psoas muscle index corresponding with longer lengths of stay and this was corroborated in a multivariable linear regression model. There were no significant associations between PMI and postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Lower PMI values were significantly associated with a longer LOS. PMI may be warranted for risk stratifying Asian spinal tumour patients undergoing surgery.
ABSTRACT
The Sengkang General Hospital Orthopaedic Spine Outpatient Service is facing a growing challenge of increasing number of referrals and waiting times, placing a significant burden on the system. Primary care referrals have an average wait time of 61.1 days, with 34.5%f patients waiting longer than 60 days from referral to appointment, to see a spine physician.Back pain is a very common presentation, with the vast majority resolving after conservative management which commonly includes analgesia, physiotherapy and reassurance. Unfortunately, many referrals from primary care involve patients who have yet to explore the avenues of conservative management with 90% of our referrals being managed without surgery. Globally, triage services in Western countries conducted by allied health professionals have shown to be an effective method at addressing the escalating wait times with high satisfaction rates. We have endeavoured to emulate this within our department through the implementation of the Spine Triage and Rehabilitation (STAR) Clinic. The STAR clinic aims to empower physiotherapists with the ability to triage patients into surgical and non-surgical categories with their primary physiotherapy expertise to reduce waiting times and increase outpatient capacity.More than 300 patients were recruited, and their progress was tracked over 13 months under the four Ss of: waiting timeS, cost Savings, Safety and patient Satisfaction. This pilot study has been overwhelmingly positive, with significantly reduced waiting times and high cost savings, without any compromise on patient safety and satisfaction.
Subject(s)
Triage , Waiting Lists , Humans , Pilot Projects , Appointments and Schedules , Physical Therapy ModalitiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The use of synthetic bone substitute material (BSM) as osteotomy gap fillers have been reported to improve outcomes in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). This study aims to evaluate the early radiological outcomes (bone union) and complication rates of the novel patient-specific 3D-printed honeycomb-structured polycaprolactone and tricalcium phosphate (PCL-TCP) synthetic graft compared to allogeneic bone grafts as an osteotomy gap filler in MOWHTO. METHODS: A retrospective matched-pair analysis of patients who underwent MOWHTO with either PCL-TCP synthetic graft or allogenic femoral head allograft as osteotomy gap filler was performed. The osteotomy gap was split into equal zones (Zone 1-5), and bone union was evaluated on anteroposterior radiographs based on the van Hemert classification at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Postoperative complications including infection, lateral hinge fractures, and persistent pain was measured. The study and control group were matched for age, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, and osteotomy gap size. RESULTS: Significantly greater bone union progression was observed in the PCL-TCP group than in the allograft group at 1 month (Zones 1-3), 3 months (Zones 1-4), 6 months (Zones 1-2, 4), and 12 months (Zones 2-3, 5) postoperatively (P < 0.05). No significant difference in complications rates was noted between the two groups at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Bone union rates observed in patients who underwent MOWHTO with the PCL-TCP synthetic graft osteotomy gap filler were superior to those in the allograft group at 1 year postoperatively, with no significant difference in complication rates (postoperative infection, lateral hinge fractures, and persistent pain).
ABSTRACT
Background: Four-dimensional computerized tomographies (4D-CTs) or motion CTs in elbow disorders have several potential advantages over conventional static imaging such as a reduction of misdiagnoses, a more targeted surgical approach, better patient understanding of their condition and potentially faster operative times. However, the radiation dose is higher than conventional static CT scans so this should be used judiciously. Our study reviews the current literature for 4D-CTs in dynamic elbow disorders and provides a technical note describing radiation-reduced targeted elbow 4D-CTs (te4D-CT) with two exemplar cases alongside our recommendations for when te4D-CTs are indicated. Methods: te4D-CTs are performed in a lateral decubitus elbow above head position. Preliminary static source axial cut CT obtained with subsequent sagittal and axial planes reconstruction and 3D reconstruction obtained, followed by scan performed in motion and reconstructed to 4D Component. te4D-CTs are taken for either flexion and extension (FE) or pronation and supination (PS) motions depending on the clinical pathology suspected following thorough clinical examination. Results: te4D-CT for PS and FE protocol scans had an effective radiation exposure dose of 0.53 and 0.95mSv, respectively, compared to 1.13-1.83 mSv in conventional elbow 4D-CTs. In addition, te4D-CTs have good diagnostic accuracy provided that the FE or PS pathology is identified carefully by the ordering physician. Conclusion: te4D-CT using isolated pronation and supination, or flexion and extension protocols does come with a significantly reduced radiation dose and can be of equal clinical yield compared with 4D-CTs.
