ABSTRACT
Herpes simplex keratitis (HSK) is a significant cause of vision impairment worldwide. Currently, there are no set diagnostic criteria, and popular diagnostic methods, including clinical examination of the eye via slit lamp examination, could lead to false-negatives and misdiagnoses. Molecular testing with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may lack concordance with clinical findings, posing a great challenge to ophthalmologists. We evaluate recent studies on techniques for the diagnosis of HSK. We included a total of 23 studies published between 2010 and 2020 in English on diagnostic techniques, including in vivo confocal microscopy, polymerase PCR testing, protein detection in tear film with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and various other protein assays. Although PCR has been widely used as one of the current diagnostic methods for HSK, most studies evaluated its efficacy after including alterations to its normal protocol. Tear sample analysis was performed using multiple tools, although corneal scrapings demonstrated a higher positive detection rate. Diagnostic tools identified were able to detect HSK with varying accuracy. Newer diagnostic techniques like multiplex dot hybridization assay and immunochromatographic assays may be considered as the point-of-care preliminary diagnostic tools. More reliable results may be generated by developing a standardized diagnostic protocol.
Subject(s)
Cornea , Keratitis, Herpetic , Cornea/metabolism , Humans , Keratitis, Herpetic/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Tears/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate recent in vivo studies on emerging therapies for managing corneal epithelial injuries. METHODS: The search was conducted on PubMed for articles published between January 2015 and September 2019 and in English language. RESULTS: Thirty studies were identified for evaluation, including those on mesenchymal stem cells, amniotic membrane-derived therapies, endogenous peptides and their inhibitors, as well as hydrogel therapies. Intermediate to strong levels of evidence are presented regarding the use of these strategies on chemically injured cornea, including their effects on healing of corneal epithelial defect, anti-inflammatory properties, prevention of corneal neovascularization, as well as restoration of anatomy and functions of the anterior eye, although clinical trials are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of these strategies on humans. CONCLUSION: Recent advances and understanding in various novel therapeutic methods for corneal epithelial chemical injuries should provide potential alternatives to current standard treatment regimens and help reduce risks of complications, hence improve patient outcomes.
