Indocyanine Green Angiography Precise Marking for Indeterminate Burn Excision: A Prospective, Multi-centered, Double-blinded Study.

BACKGROUND: During burn excision, the clinical judgment whether to excise or not excise the area with indeterminate burn depth is difficult. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has been reported to provide high accuracy in diagnosing indeterminate burns. This study aims to evaluate the complete wound closures in both short-term and long-term outcomes after using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision. METHODS: This was a prospective, multi-centered, double-blinded, experimental study. The participants were admitted to the hospital with indeterminate burn wounds. ICGA precise marking was performed. The deep second-degree burn was painted, excised, and subsequently covered with skin grafts and measured on day 5. The superficial burns were measured on day 21. All wounds were followed-up at two months. RESULTS: Thirty indeterminate burn sites were included in this study. Using ICGA precise marking, the overall rate of short-term complete wound closure, which combined superficial and deep burns, was found to be as high as 96.7% (29/30). The long-term complete wound closures at two months confirmed the short-term result and yielded 100.0% of complete wound closure. The complete wound closures between the short-term and long-term measurements were not significantly different (P > 0.999). CONCLUSIONS: Using ICGA precise marking to guide indeterminate burn excision resulted in an excellent rate of complete wound closure and an insignificant difference between short-term and long-term wound outcomes. ICGA is a competent method to aid decision-making in burn surgery of the indeterminate area.

An Inconvenient Truth of Clinical Assessment and Indocyanine Green Angiography Precise Marking for Indeterminate Burn Excision.

The clinical assessment of indeterminate burn wounds has relatively poor accuracy. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has high accuracy and can be used to mark wounds precisely so as to guide burn excision. This study aimed to assess the differences between ICGA and clinical assessment marking and compare the marking result with the long-term wound outcome. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentered, triple-blinded, experimental study. Indeterminate burn wounds were clinically assessed, and the area to be excised was firstly marked by the attending surgeon. ICGA marking was then performed by a second surgeon. Measurement of the marked area was conducted by a third surgeon. Three surgeons were each blinded to the others' processes. The wounds were followed up to assess complete wound closures on day 21. RESULTS: There were 20 burn sites included in the study. There was a significant difference in the marked areas between clinical assessment and ICGA (mean, 57.3 ± 44.1%; P = 0.001). The maximum difference found was as high as 160.9%. The correction rate of ICGA marking to complete wound closure on day 21 was 95.0%. Over 90% of the decreased areas of excision-which were assessed by ICGA to be superficial burns but evaluated by clinical assessment to be deep burns-were completely healed on day 21. CONCLUSIONS: ICGA contributes to a significant difference versus clinical assessment in the marking for excision of indeterminate burns and strongly associates with long-term wound outcomes. The burn wounds can be assessed precisely to reduce unnecessary excision and prevent inadequate excision.

The Use of Hypochlorous Acid Lavage to Treat Infected Cavity Wounds.

Managing cavity wounds that cannot be cleaned using standard irrigating solution is challenging. An immunocompromised patient with a horseshoe perianal abscess was selected to represent a heavy infection in cavity wounds. Diluted povidone-iodine was initially used to lavage the wounds, but the fever persisted and the irrigation was painful. Hypochlorous acid was then used to irrigate the wound. One day after administration of the hypochlorous acid, the fever began to subside, suggesting that this solution was able to adequately destroy the infecting microorganisms. The patient rated his pain during this procedure as 2/10. The infection had cleared within 2 weeks, and a swab culture found no microbial growth. The wound volume was reduced by more than 90% after 5 weeks, and final wound closure was achieved after 6 weeks. By comparison, another patient with a horseshoe perianal abscess who underwent traditional irrigation with diluted povidone-iodine and wet-to-dry dressing faced similar problems, but the fever in this case did not subside, and the wound became more complicated. He complained of pain during the irrigation with diluted povidone-iodine, giving the procedure a pain score of 10/10. Wound care was also difficult due to fecal contamination. As a result, the patient had to undergo colostomy to divert feces to the abdomen, thus preventing it from contaminating the wound. Time to final wound closure was 10 weeks. These cases illustrate the effectiveness of hypochlorous acid in dealing with infection in wound cavities.

Periwound Challenges Improve Patient Satisfaction in Wound Care.

In wound care, we usually focus nearly all of our efforts on the wound area while paying little attention to the periwound area. Although the periwound area may seem unimportant, it matters to patients. A female patient was admitted with a wound at the perianal area. Wound dressing was performed using standard wet-to-dry gauzes. The patient had several small complaints including irritant contact dermatitis, skin maceration, pain during dressing change, and fecal contamination to the wound. In this case, we ended up switching to a different method of wound dressing. We went from using wet-to-dry gauzes for the primary dressing to a hydrofiber with silver dressing and from gauze and Micropore as a secondary dressing to an adhesive sodium carboxymethylcellulose foam dressing. This resolved all complaints. The patient's satisfaction score using visual analog scale increased from 2 to 10 (out of 10 points). This example shows how even small details can make a significant difference in wound care. Because periwound care is often neglected, therapeutic algorithm that integrates major challenges in periwound care into wound healing strategies is proposed.

Remove Persistent Staining with a Callus Shaver.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Oblique intradermal suture as a faster choice for intradermal closure: a randomized equivalence trial.

Performing interrupted intradermal suture during bi-layered skin closure is time consuming. The oblique intradermal suture is hypothesized to be a faster choice for intradermal closure while yielding similar wound cosmetic outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate the equivalence of wound outcomes between the interrupted oblique intradermal suture (OIS) and conventional interrupted intradermal suture (IS) methods. This prospective, multicenter, double-blind randomized equivalence trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery with a linear incision wound. A split-wound model was used. One half of the wound was sutured using IS method and the other using OIS method. Wounds were evaluated at 1 week and 2 months after surgery. Of the 120 patients, OIS was found to be equivalent to IS for all clinical outcome parameters. OIS was associated with 50% reduction in suture time and the number of stitches required, and a 40% reduction in suture material used (p < .001). Rates of wound dehiscence and infection were not different between methods. Wound outcomes using OIS were equivalent to those observed when using IS, except that OIS yielded reductions in suturing time, number of stitches and suturing material used. OIS is a cost and clinically effective wound closure method. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03001856 Meeting presentation: 7th Bozner Symposium of Plastic Surgery, Bozen, Italy, January 2017.

Indocyanine green dye angiography as an adjunct to assess indeterminate burn wounds: A prospective, multicentered, triple-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of indeterminate burn wounds has been reported to yield poor accuracy, even when performed by burn experts. Indocyanine green (ICG) dye angiography has been found to be highly accurate in assessing burn depth, but there is still limited evidence of its use in indeterminate burn wounds. This study aims to compare the accuracy of ICG angiography to that of clinical assessment in assessing indeterminate burn wounds. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicentered, triple-blinded, experimental study. Participants were stable patients, admitted to the hospital with burn wounds of indeterminate depth. The burn wounds were clinically assessed by an attending plastic surgeon. ICG angiography was performed and evaluated by another surgeon. Tissue biopsies were obtained and sent for histological study to be assessed as the gold standard. RESULTS: In the 30 burn sites that were assessed, the accuracy of ICG angiography was 100.0%, compared with 50.0% for clinical assessment (p < 0.001). Clinical assessment yielded a sensitivity of 33.3% and specificity of 66.7%, while ICG angiography yielded both a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0%. Therefore, the number needed to treat for using ICG angiography in indeterminate burn wounds was two. CONCLUSION: Indocyanine green angiography yields a significantly higher accuracy than clinical assessment in indeterminate burn wounds. This intervention can, thus, be a useful tool to aid clinical judgment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry, number TCTR20170821001. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level I.

Preoperative Needs-Based Education to Reduce Anxiety, Increase Satisfaction, and Decrease Time Spent in Day Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Too much or too little information during patient education can increase patient anxiety. Needs-based patient education helps to determine the appropriate amount of information required to provide education based on patient needs. This study aimed to compare needs-based patient education with traditional patient education in reducing preoperative anxiety. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients undergoing day surgery were randomized into a study group (needs-based education) or a control group (traditional education). The primary outcome was patient anxiety. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and time spent in patient education. Patients completed questionnaires to evaluate their anxiety and satisfaction before patient education, after patient education, and after surgery. RESULTS: In total, 450 patients were randomized and analyzed (study group n = 225, control group n = 225). Comparisons before education, after education, and after surgery showed that there was a significant decrease in patient anxiety and an increase in satisfaction in both groups (p < 0.001). The comparison between needs-based education and traditional education showed a greater decrease in anxiety (7.09 ± 7.02 vs. 5.33 ± 7.70, p = 0.001) and greater increase in satisfaction (21.1 ± 16.0 vs. 16.0 ± 21.6, p < 0.001) in the needs-based group. The needs-based group also had significantly less education time than the traditional group (171.8 ± 87.59 vs. 236.32 ± 101.27 s, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Needs-based patient education is more effective in decreasing anxiety, increasing patient satisfaction, and reducing time spent in education compared with traditional patient education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03003091.