Association Between Altered Hip Extension and Kinetic Gait Variables.

Kinematic and kinetic outcome measures are tightly linked in walking. Although altering motor output is a major goal of gait rehabilitation, little is understood regarding the relationship between altering a single kinematic variable and kinetic outcome changes. We designed a strategy to isolate hip extension alterations during walking on a treadmill to assess the change in kinetic outcomes. Ten healthy individuals walked on an instrumented split-belt treadmill with motion capture to calculate hip extension and kinetic outcomes at the following five different randomized cadences: self-selected cadence, self-selected ± 10%, and self-selected ± 20%. The treadmill speed was held constant at the individual's self-selected walking speed, forcing cadence changes to result in successful alterations to hip extension, varying 8.3 degrees from the self-selected -20% to +20% cadence conditions. Kinetic outcomes demonstrated similar alterations. Hip extension changes at each cadence significantly correlated with kinetic changes in propulsive impulse (r = 0.852, P < 0.001), peak ankle power (r = 0.473, P = 0.002), and ankle plantarflexion work (r = 0.762, P < 0.001). These results demonstrate that kinetic outcomes are highly alterable in response to a kinematic gait change. This clinically relevant finding highlights the potential to improve motor output in individuals during rehabilitation by altering gait patterns to achieve more optimal limb positions.

A systematic review of mechanisms of gait speed change post-stroke. Part 1: spatiotemporal parameters and asymmetry ratios.

BACKGROUND: In walking rehabilitation trials, self-selected walking speed (SSWS) has emerged as the dominant outcome measure to assess walking ability. However, this measure cannot differentiate between recovery of impaired movement and compensation strategies. Spatiotemporal variables and asymmetry ratios are frequently used to quantify gait deviations and are hypothesized markers of recovery. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to investigate spatiotemporal variables and asymmetry ratios as mechanistic recovery measures in physical therapy intervention studies post-stroke. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify physical therapy intervention studies with a statistically significant change in SSWS post intervention and concurrently collected spatiotemporal variables. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Walking speed, spatiotemporal, and intervention data were extracted. RESULTS: 46 studies met the inclusion criteria, 41 of which reported raw spatiotemporal measures and 19 reported asymmetry ratio calculations. Study interventions included: aerobic training (n = 2), functional electrical stimulation (n = 5), hippotherapy (n = 2), motor dual task training (n = 2), multidimensional rehabilitation (n = 4), robotics (n = 4), sensory stimulation training (n = 8), strength/resistance training (n = 4), task specific locomotor rehabilitation (n = 9), and visually guided training (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: Spatiotemporal variables help describe gait deviations, but scale to speed, so consequently, may not be an independent factor in describing functional recovery and gains. Therefore, these variables are limited in explaining mechanistic changes involved in improving gait speed. Use of asymmetry measures provides additional information regarding the coordinative requirements for gait and can potentially indicate recovery. Additional laboratory-based mechanistic measures may be required to truly understand how walking speed improves.

A systematic review of mechanisms of gait speed change post-stroke. Part 2: exercise capacity, muscle activation, kinetics, and kinematics.

BACKGROUND: Regaining locomotor ability is a primary goal in stroke rehabilitation and is most commonly measured using changes in self-selected walking speed. However, walking speed cannot identify the mechanisms by which an individual recovers. Laboratory-based mechanistic measures such as exercise capacity, muscle activation, force production, and movement analysis variables may better explain neurologic recovery. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this systematic review are to examine changes in mechanistic gait outcomes and describe motor recovery as quantified by changes in laboratory-based mechanistic variables in rehabilitation trials. METHODS: Following a systematic literature search (in PubMed, Ovid, and CINAHL), we included rehabilitation trials with a statistically significant change in self-selected walking speed post-intervention that concurrently collected mechanistic variables. Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Walking speed changes, mechanistic variables, and intervention data were extracted. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and examined: cardiorespiratory function (n = 5), muscle activation (n = 5), force production (n = 11), and movement analysis (n = 10). Interventions included: aerobic training, functional electrical stimulation, multidimensional rehabilitation, robotics, sensory stimulation training, strength/resistance training, task-specific locomotor rehabilitation, and visually-guided training. CONCLUSIONS: Following this review, no set of outcome measures to mechanistically explain changes observed in walking speed were identified. Nor is there a theoretical basis to drive the complicated selection of outcome measures, as many of these outcomes are not independent of walking speed. Since rehabilitation literature is yet to support a causal, mechanistic link for functional gains post-stroke, a systematic, multimodal approach to stroke rehabilitation will be necessary in doing so.