ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: Examination using three-dimensional screw trajectory software and computed tomographic scans. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel trajectory for C7 laminar screws and to compare it with an old trajectory. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The previously reported trajectory of C7 laminar screws has a horizontal direction without a fixed target point. Our new trajectory has a cephalad direction with a fixed target point. METHODS: Computed tomographic scans of a total of 50 male and 50 female patients were utilized. The placement of C7 laminar screws was activated employing the new and old trajectories. The success rate, the causes of failure, and the maximum allowable length of each trajectory were compared. RESULTS: Employing the new trajectory, the success rates of the unilaminar and bilaminar screws were 93% and 83%, respectively, which were significantly better than the old trajectory (80%, p<0.0001 and 70%, p=0.0003). The most prevalent cause of failure was laminar cortical breach followed by facet joint violation. The new trajectory also offered significantly longer maximum allowable screw length in unilaminar (32.5±4.3 mm vs. 26.5±2.6 mm, p<0.001), bilaminar cephalic (29.5±3.8 mm vs. 25.9±2.6 mm, p<0.0001) and bilaminar caudal (33.1±2.6 mm vs. 25.8±3.1 mm, p<0.001) screws than the old trajectory. With the new and old trajectories, 70% vs. 6% of unilaminar, 60% vs. 2% of bilaminar caudal, and 32% vs. 4% of bilaminar cephalic screws could be protracted perfectly into the corresponding lateral mass without any laminar cortical or facet joint violation (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The novel trajectory possesses a substantially higher success rate, longer maximum allowable screw length, and higher chance to be extended into the lateral mass (a condition known as a lamino-lateral mass screw) than the old trajectory.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intra-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) can be delivered intraventricularly via an Ommaya reservoir. However, hydrocephalus associated with LM can interfere with chemotherapeutic drug distribution, and ventriculoperitoneal shunts can prevent drug distribution to the extra-ventricular CSF space. This study examined the feasibility of combining a lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt with an Ommaya reservoir to both control intracranial pressure and allow for intraventricular chemotherapy. METHODS: We identified 16 patients with LM who received both an Ommaya reservoir and an LP shunt, either concurrently or sequentially, and subsequently received intraventricular chemotherapy. The feasibility of this combination for intraventricular chemotherapy was evaluated by assessing 1) the distribution of intraventricularly injected drugs in CSF samples collected 0, 6, and 12 h post-injection and 2) adverse events associated with the procedure and drug administration. RESULTS: Patients received a median of seven rounds (range 1-37) of intraventricular chemotherapy during a median follow-up period of 5.2 months after LP shunt insertion. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from six patients. Baseline methotrexate (MTX) levels from Ommaya reservoirs varied from 339.9 µM to 1,523.5 µM. CSF sampled from LP shunt reservoirs revealed an elimination half-life (t1/2) of 2.63 h, and the mean ratio of MTX concentration at 12 h to that at baseline was 0.05±0.05, ensuring drug distribution from the ventricle to the spinal canal. Nine patients (56%) underwent revision surgery due to catheter migration, malfunction, or infection. Among these patients, CSF infections attributable to intraventricular chemotherapy (n=3) occurred, but no infections occurred in later cases after we began to employ a complete aseptic technique. CONCLUSION: LP shunt combined with Ommaya reservoir insertion is a feasible option for achieving both intracranial pressure control and the continuation of intraventricular chemotherapy in patients with LM.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the risk of communicating hydrocephalus in cerebellopontine angle tumors, focusing on distinct tumor types and treatment modalities, i.e., tumor resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: This study was a retrospective single-center cohort study. The cumulative incidences of symptomatic communicating hydrocephalus in schwannoma and meningioma patients were evaluated. A multivariate Cox model was used to assess the hazard ratios for the risk factors and odds ratios of distinct treatment subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 405 cases, including 286 schwannomas and 119 meningiomas, were retrospectively reviewed. The risk of hydrocephalus was significantly higher in schwannomas than that in meningiomas (hazard ratio, 4.70 [95% confidence interval, 1.78-12.4, P = 0.002]). Patients with schwannomas who received SRS without tumor resection showed a significantly higher incidence than meningioma cases: 10.6% versus 1.4% (P = 0.037). We identified specific subgroups that were prone to increase the risk of hydrocephalus when treated with SRS alone. The result showed that patients with vestibular schwannoma of Koos grade III had a greater benefit from tumor resection than from SRS in preventing hydrocephalus (odds ratio, 0.089 [95% confidence interval, 0.011-0.743, P = 0.025]). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic communicating hydrocephalus is more frequent in schwannoma than that in meningiomas. Primary treatment with tumor resection lowers the risk of hydrocephalus in specific subgroups of vestibular schwannoma.
