Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Geriatr Cardiol ; 10(3): 226-9, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24133508

ABSTRACT

We describe a patient suffering from late stent thrombosis in a paclitaxel-eluting stent which had an underexpanded ring due to the three-hundred-sixty-degree circumferential calcified plaque. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) revealed rotational atherectomy could successfully ablate both the metallic ring and the calcified ring. The ablated segment was scaffolded with a new paclitaxel-eluting stent, well expanded and documented by IVUS. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of stent ablation for an unexpanded paclitaxel-eluting stent. From the Medline index, there were only six case reports of stent ablation. We review and summarize the operation details of stent ablation from these reports.

2.
Chin Med J (Engl) ; 124(6): 862-6, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21518593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated worse results of women in both hospital and short-term outcomes post-percutaneous coronary intervention. However, with advanced devices like drug-eluting stents (DESs) available, there are no consistent data revealing gender impact in outcome. This study examined whether gender affected hospital outcome and showed one-year single-center patient results of coronary stenting. METHODS: The study group included 969 consecutive patients (250 women and 719 men) undergoing coronary stenting for stable or unstable angina. Clinical events were assessed for at least 1 year post-procedure. RESULTS: Compared to men, women were older, presented more often with diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and lower creatinine clearance rate (Ccr); they had less percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) history, smaller vessel size, and shorter lesions. The hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate was 2.8% of women and 0.97% of men (P = 0.037). The one-year MACE rate was 10.0% of women and 10.4% of men (P = 0.874). After adjusting other covariates, women still had significantly higher hospital MACE rates (P = 0.034) and odds ratios (0.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.036-0.874). In women (n = 250), there was no statistically significant difference in hospital or one-year MACE between bare metal stent (BMS) and DES groups. Meanwhile, in men (n = 719), DES had a significant one-year improvement of MACE compared to BMS (P = 0.004). The female hospital MACE rate was five times greater than male results. However, there were similar one-year outcomes between women and men. DES currently have an advantage in long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, with the use of BMS and DES, adverse hospital post-procedure cardiovascular event rate has occurred more often in women than in men. However, the MACE rate differences between women and men resolved with one year follow-up.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Aged , Angina Pectoris/therapy , Angina, Unstable/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...