Sustained Resolution of Macular Retinoschisis After Trabeculectomy in a Patient With Progressive Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics of a patient with primary open-angle glaucoma in whom macular retinoschisis resolved completely after trabeculectomy consistently lowered intraocular pressure (IOP). METHODS: A single case report. RESULTS: We report a case of retinoschisis involving the macula in a patient with primary open-angle glaucoma in the absence of myopic maculopathy, optic nerve anomaly, or x-linked retinoschisis. The patient's glaucoma was associated with progressive visual field loss in the setting of IOP fluctuations related to posture. A trabeculectomy reduced IOP and posture-related IOP fluctuations with subsequent resolution of macular retinoschisis. In the 1-year postoperative period following trabeculectomy, the patient has remained without retinoschisis and visual fields have been stable. CONCLUSIONS: Improved IOP control resulting in resolution of retinoschisis may distinguish retinoschisis associated with glaucoma from other forms of retinoschisis.

Aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study of quantitative analysis of vascular features.

PURPOSE: To evaluate aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP) with regard to inter-expert diagnostic agreement and quantitative vascular features. METHODS: Eight ROP experts interpreted 15 retinal images for AP-ROP and plus disease. Inter-expert agreement was calculated by absolute agreement for AP-ROP and plus, and kappa statistic for each expert was compared with others. Retinal vessels were analyzed by a computer-based system to calculate diameter and integrated curvature (IC). Consensus reference standards for images were developed, and quantitative parameters for arterioles and venules were compared among images with AP-ROP vs. not AP-ROP, plus vs. not plus, and AP-ROP vs. plus. RESULTS: Mean kappa for each expert in AP-ROP diagnosis ranged from -0.15 (no agreement) to 0.42 (moderate agreement). Nine (30 %) of 30 total AP-ROP diagnoses were also classified as not plus disease. Analysis of images with AP-ROP vs. plus showed that images with AP-ROP had higher venular IC (p = 0.04). Arteriolar IC was statistically significant between images with AP-ROP vs. not AP-ROP (p = 0.01) and plus vs. not plus (p = 0.00003). There were no statistically significant differences in diameter between image groups. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-expert agreement with regard to AP-ROP diagnosis is imperfect. Venular curvature may be a distinguishing characteristic between AP-ROP and plus. Future studies involving quantitative features of AP-ROP will have benefits for clinical diagnosis and management.