Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Fam Process ; 58(1): 197-213, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29363745

ABSTRACT

Informed by dyadic approaches and culturally informed, ecological perspectives of marriage, we applied an actor-partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) in a sample of 120 Mexican-origin couples to examine (a) the associations linking Mexican immigrant husbands' and wives' gender role attitudes to marital satisfaction directly and indirectly through marital processes (i.e., warmth and negativity) and (b) whether the associations between spouses' gender role attitudes and marital processes were moderated by wives' employment. Although previous research has identified spouses' gender role attitudes as potential predictors of spouses' marital satisfaction, no study has examined these links in a dyadic model that elucidates how gender role attitudes may operate through processes to shape marital satisfaction and conditions under which associations may differ. We found that when spouses reported less sex-typed attitudes, their partners reported feeling more connected to them and more satisfied with the marriage, regardless of whether wives were employed. Our results suggest that marital satisfaction was highest for those Mexican-origin couples in which marital partners were less sex-typed in their attitudes about marital roles to the extent that partners' attitudinal role flexibility promoted spouses' feelings of warmth and connection to their partner.


Sobre la base de enfoques diádicos y perspectivas de matrimonio ecológicas y culturalmente fundamentadas, aplicamos un modelo de mediación e interdependencia actor-pareja en una muestra de 120 parejas de origen mexicano para examinar (a) las asociaciones que conectan las actitudes hacia los roles de género de los esposos y las esposas inmigrantes mexicanos con la satisfacción conyugal directamente e indirectamente mediante procesos conyugales (p. ej.: calidez y negatividad) y (b) si las asociaciones entre las actitudes hacia los roles de género de los cónyuges y los procesos conyugales estuvieron moderados por el empleo de las esposas. Aunque en investigaciones anteriores se han reconocido las actitudes hacia los roles de género de los cónyuges como posibles predictores de su satisfacción conyugal, ningún estudio ha analizado estas conexiones en un modelo diádico que aclare cómo las actitudes hacia los roles de género pueden funcionar mediante procesos para determinar la satisfacción conyugal y las condiciones en las cuales las asociaciones pueden diferir. Descubrimos que cuando los cónyuges informaron menos actitudes consideradas adecuadas para cada género, sus parejas informaron sentirse más conectadas con ellos y más satisfechas con el matrimonio, independientemente de si las esposas estaban empleadas o no. Nuestros resultados sugieren que la satisfacción conyugal fue mayor para las parejas de origen mexicano en las cuales los cónyuges tuvieron actitudes menos típicas de cada género con respecto a los roles conyugales hasta el punto de que la flexibilidad actitudinal hacia los roles de los integrantes de la pareja fomentó sentimientos de calidez y conexión con su pareja.


Subject(s)
Attitude/ethnology , Marriage/psychology , Mexican Americans/psychology , Personal Satisfaction , Spouses/psychology , Adult , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Mexico/ethnology , Models, Psychological
2.
J Fam Psychol ; 29(3): 321-30, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25915088

ABSTRACT

Informed by socioecological and dyadic approaches to understanding marriage, the current study examined the patterning of gender-typed attributes among 120 Mexican immigrant opposite sex couples and the subsequent links with spouses' reports of marital satisfaction. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to identify typologies of couples based on spouses' self-reported masculine and feminine attributes. Three couple profiles were identified: (a) Androgynous Couples, (b) Undifferentiated Couples, and (c) Mismatched Couples. Results from a mixed model ANCOVA showed profile differences in couples' marital satisfaction based on profile membership, suggesting that spouses in the Undifferentiated Profile were the least satisfied. Findings illustrate a lack of gender-typing at the individual and couple levels that challenge stereotypical and patriarchal depictions of Latino marital relationships and propose a more complex understanding of Mexican-origin spouses' gender-typed attributes than has yet been portrayed in the literature. The finding that couples with 1 androgynous partner (i.e., wives in the Mismatched Profile) reported similar levels of marital satisfaction to couples in the Androgynous Profile offers additional insights regarding how these qualities operate under the unique socioecological niches that Mexican immigrant couples inhabit-contexts that may place demands on spouses that challenge gendered and culturally bound depictions of marriage.


Subject(s)
Family Characteristics/ethnology , Gender Identity , Mexican Americans/ethnology , Personal Satisfaction , Spouses/ethnology , Adult , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Marriage/ethnology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL