Primate-specific oestrogen-responsive long non-coding RNAs regulate proliferation and viability of human breast cancer cells.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts of a recently discovered class of genes which do not code for proteins. LncRNA genes are approximately as numerous as protein-coding genes in the human genome. However, comparatively little remains known about lncRNA functions. We globally interrogated changes in the lncRNA transcriptome of oestrogen receptor positive human breast cancer cells following treatment with oestrogen, and identified 127 oestrogen-responsive lncRNAs. Consistent with the emerging evidence that most human lncRNA genes lack homologues outside of primates, our evolutionary analysis revealed primate-specific lncRNAs downstream of oestrogen signalling. We demonstrate, using multiple functional assays to probe gain- and loss-of-function phenotypes in two oestrogen receptor positive human breast cancer cell lines, that two primate-specific oestrogen-responsive lncRNAs identified in this study (the oestrogen-repressed lncRNA BC041455, which reduces cell viability, and the oestrogen-induced lncRNA CR593775, which increases cell viability) exert previously unrecognized functions in cell proliferation and growth factor signalling pathways. The results suggest that oestrogen-responsive lncRNAs are capable of altering the proliferation and viability of human breast cancer cells. No effects on cellular phenotypes were associated with control transfections. As heretofore unappreciated components of key signalling pathways in cancers, including the MAP kinase pathway, lncRNAs hence represent a novel mechanism of action for oestrogen effects on cellular proliferation and viability phenotypes. This finding warrants further investigation in basic and translational studies of breast and potentially other types of cancers, has broad relevance to lncRNAs in other nuclear hormone receptor pathways, and should facilitate exploiting and targeting these cell viability modulating lncRNAs in post-genomic therapeutics.

Sense-antisense gene pairs: sequence, transcription, and structure are not conserved between human and mouse.

Previous efforts to characterize conservation between the human and mouse genomes focused largely on sequence comparisons. These studies are inherently limited because they don't account for gene structure differences, which may exist despite genomic sequence conservation. Recent high-throughput transcriptome studies have revealed widespread and extensive overlaps between genes, and transcripts, encoded on both strands of the genomic sequence. This overlapping gene organization, which produces sense-antisense (SAS) gene pairs, is capable of effecting regulatory cascades through established mechanisms. We present an evolutionary conservation assessment of SAS pairs, on three levels: genomic, transcriptomic, and structural. From a genome-wide dataset of human SAS pairs, we first identified orthologous loci in the mouse genome, then assessed their transcription in the mouse, and finally compared the genomic structures of SAS pairs expressed in both species. We found that approximately half of human SAS loci have single orthologous locations in the mouse genome; however, only half of those orthologous locations have SAS transcriptional activity in the mouse. This suggests that high human-mouse gene conservation overlooks widespread distinctions in SAS pair incidence and expression. We compared gene structures at orthologous SAS loci, finding frequent differences in gene structure between human and orthologous mouse SAS pair members. Our categorization of human SAS pairs with respect to mouse conservation of expression as well as structure points to limitations of mouse models. Gene structure differences, including at SAS loci, may account for some of the phenotypic distinctions between primates and rodents. Genes in non-conserved SAS pairs may contribute to evolutionary lineage-specific regulatory outcomes.

MicroRNAs in opioid addiction: elucidating evolution.

Three reviews in the Frontiers Research Topic "Non-Coding RNA and Addiction" (He and Wang, 2012; Rodriguez, 2012; Zheng et al., 2012), grouped under the chapter "MicroRNAs and Morphine," focus on the contribution of microRNAs to opioid abuse. Although animal models have been fundamental to our understanding of addiction pathways, the assumption that microRNAs implicated in opioid tolerance - and their binding sites in mRNAs - are conserved in mammalian evolution was not examined by the authors. Inspired by recent reports which highlight a surprising lack of evolutionary conservation in non-coding RNA genes, in this perspective we use public genome, annotation, and transcriptome datasets to verify microRNA host gene, mature microRNA, and microRNA binding site conservation at key loci functional in opioid addiction. We reveal a complex evolutionary landscape in which certain directional regulatory edges of the microRNA-mRNA hub-and-spoke network lack pan-mammalian conservation.

Developmental evolution of the insect retina: insights from standardized numbering of homologous photoreceptors.

The canonical number of eight photoreceptors and their arrangement in the ommatidia of insect compound eyes is very conserved. However significant variations exist in selective groups, such as the Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera, which independently evolved additional photoreceptors. For this and historical reasons, heterogeneous labeling conventions have been in use for photoreceptor subtypes, despite developmentally and structurally well-defined homologies. Extending earlier efforts, we introduce a universal photoreceptor subtype classification key that relates to the Drosophila numbering system. Its application is demonstrated in major insect orders, with detailed information on the relationship to previous conventions. We then discuss new insights that result from the improved understanding of photoreceptor subtype homologies. This includes evidence of functionally imposed ground rules of differential opsin expression, the underappreciated role of R8 as ancestral color receptor, the causes and consequences of parallel R7 photoreceptor addition in Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera, and the ancestral subfunctionalization of outer photoreceptors cells, which may be only developmentally recapitulated in Drosophila. We conclude with pointing out the need for opsin expression data from a wider range of insect orders.