Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 10, 2024 Feb 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38319386

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare results of two ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs)-Viscoat (a dispersive OVD, Alcon) and FR-Pro (a viscous-cohesive OVD, Rayner), in phacoemulsification surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study. Patients undergoing phacoemulsification were randomly assigned to receive one of the two OVDs. Exclusion criteria were age under 40, preoperative endothelial cell count (ECC) below 1,500 cells/mm2 and an eventful surgery. The primary outcome was change in ECC from baseline to postoperative month one and month three. Secondary outcomes were the difference between ECC at postoperative month one and month three, changes in IOP and occurrence of an IOP spike ≥ 30 mmHg after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 84 eyes-43 in the Viscoat group and 41 in the FR-Pro group. Mean cell density loss at month one and month three was 17.0 and 19.2%, respectively, for the Viscoat group and 18.4 and 18.8%, respectively, for the FR-Pro group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.772 and p = 0.671, respectively). The mean ECC difference between the month one and month three visits was 50.5 cells/mm2 and was not statistically significant (p = 0.285). One eye in each group had an IOP spike ≥ 30 mmHg, both normalized by postoperative week one. CONCLUSIONS: Viscoat and FR-Pro have comparable results following phacoemulsification surgery, suggesting that while FR-Pro is not a dispersive OVD, its endothelial cell protection may be comparable to one, perhaps due to the addition of sorbitol. Furthermore, a one-month follow-up of ECC seems sufficient in such trials.


Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Phacoemulsification , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss/diagnosis , Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss/etiology , Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Eye
2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(1)2024 Jan 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38256383

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: This study aims to investigate the potential association between the COVID-19 pandemic and a new presentation of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted, comparing the incidence of new-onset CSCR cases among ophthalmology patients in a regional medical facility in southern Israel between two distinct periods: the COVID-19 pandemic era in Israel, which occurred from 27 February 2020 to 20 December 2020, and the non-pandemic period from calendar years 2018 to 2021, excluding the specific epidemic phase mentioned. Disease severity was evaluated based on recovery time, visual acuity loss, and central macular thickness via OCT. Results: Over the four-year period, 35 new cases of CSCR were recorded. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 17 new cases (0.005% per population) were identified, compared with 18 new cases (0.002% per population) in the preceding three years. The odds ratio for acute CSCR during the pandemic was 2.83 (95% CI, 1.46-5.50) with a p-value of 0.02. CSCR cases during the pandemic seemed to exhibit worse clinical characteristics, though not statistically significant. Additionally, 22.2% of the COVID-19 pandemic group had confirmed COVID-19 cases, which was statistically significantly higher than the general population's reported cases (6%). Conclusion: The study revealed a statistically significant increase of over 2.5 times in acute CSCR incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with non-pandemic periods. The findings suggest that the pandemic's stressful changes may have unintended consequences on the occurrence of CSCR, highlighting the importance of mental health support and psychoeducation for affected patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/epidemiology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Acute Disease
3.
Harefuah ; 161(8): 523-525, 2022 Aug.
Article in Hebrew | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35979573

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative disease pathologically characterized by accumulation of abnormal amyloid-beta (Aß) and tau proteins. Research is currently focused on developing treatments to reduce the risk of developing or inhibiting disease progression. Therefore, there is a need to identify diagnostic tools for the initial stages of the disease. The neuropathological processes in Alzheimer's disease exist several decades before symptoms appear and can be identified by PET imaging or CSF analysis. Still, these methods are limited in availability and may be expensive and invasive, and there is therefore a need to develop accessible, inexpensive and non-invasive diagnostic tools. The retina is a component of the central nervous system. Changes in the retina can reflect the cerebral pathological process in Alzheimer's disease. Indeed, evidence of Aß plaques and abnormal tau proteins in the retina of Alzheimer's patients has been reported. The advantage of the retina is its accessibility for direct visualization by existing and non-invasive means. The following review will examine retinal changes that are suggested as possible biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease and discuss directions for future research in the field.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Amyloid beta-Peptides/metabolism , Biomarkers , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Neurodegenerative Diseases/metabolism , Neurodegenerative Diseases/pathology , Retina/diagnostic imaging , Retina/metabolism , Retina/pathology , tau Proteins/metabolism
4.
Int Ophthalmol ; 42(11): 3387-3395, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35604624

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: COVID-19 emerged in the end of 2019 and was declared a worldwide pandemic shortly after. Social distancing and lockdowns resulted in lower compliance in intravitreal injections and office visits. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes among patients who missed these visits compared to those who arrived as planned. METHODS: Patients who missed or were late to office visits or intravitreal injections were defined as non-adherent and were compared to adherent patients. Our main outcomes were the need for subsequent injections, mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular thickness (CMT). RESULTS: This study included 77 patients (24 adherent and 53 non-adherent). The mean BCVA remained stable during the study period for the adherent group (p = 0.159) and worsened in the non-adherent group (p < 0.001). Changes in CMT and maximum thickness were not significant for either group. A higher proportion of patients in the non-adherent group needed subsequent intravitreal injections (49% vs 20%, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the negative implications of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of deferring bevacizumab injections among individuals with age-related macular degeneration. This emphasizes the importance of a scheduled follow-up, also during a pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Macular Degeneration , Humans , Bevacizumab , Intravitreal Injections , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Visual Acuity , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Communicable Disease Control , Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Macular Degeneration/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Follow-Up Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL