ABSTRACT
Until recently, the sole treatment for patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was nephrectomy followed by observation. As metastatic RCC (mRCC) remains largely incurable (5-year survival rate â¼12%), adjuvant treatment, with potential to prevent/delay disease recurrence, is needed. In November 2017, sunitinib was approved in the USA as the first adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk for recurrent RCC postnephrectomy based on results from the S-TRAC trial. Patients eligible for adjuvant treatment have no evidence of disease and may be less willing to tolerate side effects. Therefore, proactive adverse event management is critical for keeping patients on adjuvant treatment and requires understanding the subtle differences in the adverse event profile of sunitinib in the adjuvant versus metastatic RCC setting.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/epidemiology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , SEER Program , Sunitinib/administration & dosage , Sunitinib/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
CASE STUDY Tom, a 75-year-old white male, was recently diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC; Tom's case is not an actual clinical case but has been developed by the authors as an exemplar). Two years prior, he had undergone a left partial (laparoscopic) nephrectomy for clear cell RCC. At that time, he had a stage 3 disease (the tumor extended into perinephric tissues but not into the ipsilateral adrenal gland and not beyond Gerota's fascia [Cancer.net, 2016]), and regularly (every 3-6 months) scheduled surveillance imaging did not show metastatic disease. Recent imaging with a computed tomography (CT) of the chest/abdomen/pelvis revealed small bilateral pulmonary nodules that did not have the radiographic appearance of a primary lung tumor, but rather that of metastatic disease. Therefore, a decision was made to repeat CT scans in a shorter interval (in 6 weeks) to assess growth kinetics. Subsequent CT scan showed an increase in size and number of pulmonary nodules, so the decision was made to begin systemic treatment. At the time of Tom's metastatic evaluation, his Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 as he was asymptomatic and fully active (Table 1). He was classified as favorable risk according to Heng criteria (Table 2). Tom is married and lives with his wife. He is independent in his self-care but also relies on his wife for health-care decision-making. He does not drink alcohol and is a former smoker with a history of 30 pack-years. Tom's medical history includes hypertension that is adequately controlled with lisinopril (20 mg/day), coronary artery disease (on daily aspirin 81 mg) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > 50%, which is within the normal range (50%-75%), benign prostatic hyperplasia for which he is treated with finasteride, and hyperlipidemia that is treated with atorvastatin.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vatalanib is an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), whereas everolimus inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Combination therapy with VEGFR and mTOR inhibitors has not been well tolerated to date but may have efficacy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A phase Ib study of vatalanib and everolimus was performed in patients with advanced solid tumors to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and tolerability of the combination. A dose-expansion cohort of 20 patients with metastatic RCC was studied to further define toxicity and preliminary efficacy in patients with RCC. RESULTS: We evaluated 32 patients over 3 dose levels and a dose-expansion cohort. The most common toxicities of any grade were proteinuria, fatigue, hypertriglyceridemia, nausea, and vomiting. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included severe hypertension, diarrhea, neutropenia, mucositis, and fatigue. The MTD for the combination was vatalanib 1000 mg daily and everolimus 5 mg daily. In all patients, median overall survival (OS) was 16.3 months. In patients with RCC, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months, and OS was 16.5 months. OS was significantly better in treatment-naive patients (25.1 months) compared with patients who had received previous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy (6.3 months). Seven of 24 (29.2%) evaluable patients demonstrated a partial response, and an additional 15 patients exhibited stable disease. Long-term tolerability (> 1 year) was demonstrated in 19% of patients. CONCLUSION: Relevant doses of vatalanib and everolimus were achieved in combination, with expected toxicities. A substantial number of patients with RCC achieved an objective response in the treatment-naive setting, with prolonged tolerability and survival. Further comparative phase II/III studies of specifically targeted VEGF and mTOR inhibitor combinations may be warranted in patients with RCC.
