Factors associated with patients who prefer HIV self-testing over health professional testing in an emergency department-based rapid HIV screening program.

Kiosk-facilitated HIV self-testing has been shown to be accurate and well accepted by emergency department (ED) patients. We investigated factors associated with patients who preferred self-testing over testing performed by health professionals in an ED-based HIV screening program. This opt-in program evaluation studied 332 patients in an inner-city academic ED from February 2012 to April 2012, when a kiosk-based HIV self-testing program was standard of care. The first kiosk in the 2-stage system registered patients and assessed their interest in screening, while the second kiosk gathered demographic and risk factor information and also provided self-testing instructions. Patients who declined to self-test were offered testing by staff. Broad eligibility included patients aged 18-64 years who were not critically ill, English-speaking, able to provide informed consent, and registered during HIV program operational hours. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis and Chi squared tests; 160 (48.2%) of 332 patients consenting to testing chose to use a kiosk to guide them performing self-testing. Patients aged 25-29 years and those whose primary ED diagnosis was not infectious disease-related were more likely to prefer HIV self-testing (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.17-4.10; OR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.03-3.12). HIV self-testing in the ED could serve as a complementary testing approach to the conventional modality.

Public Health Information Delivery in the Emergency Department: Analysis of a Kiosk-Based Program.

BACKGROUND: Because more than one-third of the U.S. population visits an emergency department (ED) any given year, public health interventions in the ED can have major population-level impacts. OBJECTIVES: We determined ED patients' interest in receiving information via kiosk on common, chronic conditions for which education and preventive screening could offer public health benefit and to assess what topical information patients are interested in receiving. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of survey data from an ED pilot program December 2011 to April 2012. Main outcome measures were patients' interests in receiving information on health topics via kiosk module. RESULTS: More than half of the 4351 patients indicated interest in receiving information on at least one health topic, including high blood pressure (30%), depression (21%), diabetes (18%), sexually transmitted diseases (11%), drug abuse (6%), and physical abuse (3%). African-American patients were more likely to be interested in receiving information on high blood pressure (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.2-3.2]), depression (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), diabetes/sugar (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8-2.8), drug abuse (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9), and sexually transmitted diseases (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.7). Participants >55 years of age were more likely to desire information on high blood pressure and diabetes (age 55-64 years: OR 4.0, 95% CI 3.1-5.1; age >64 years: OR 4.4, 95% CI 3.2-6.2). Patients who were interested in receiving public health information were more likely to be older, African American, and male (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Interest in obtaining kiosk-delivered education on hypertension predominated. Kiosks are versatile tools that could be used in ED settings to provide health education services.

Comparing resident cataract surgery outcomes under novice versus experienced attending supervision.

PURPOSE: To determine whether supervision by an attending who is new to surgical teaching, or an experienced attending measurably influences intraoperative complications rates or outcomes in phacoemulsification performed by ophthalmology residents. SETTING: Single tertiary hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Resident-performed phacoemulsification cases supervised by one novice attending (N=189) and experienced attending (N=172) over 1 year were included. Data included: resident year, patient age, sex, preoperative risk factors (4+ on the four point scale for dense/white/brunescent cataracts, Flomax, zonular dialysis, pseudoexfoliation, glaucoma risk, post-vitrectomy), intraoperative risk factors (Trypan blue, iris hooks), and intraoperative complications (capsule tears, vitreous loss, zonular dialysis, zonular dehiscence, burns, nuclear fragment loss, Descemet's tear). Experienced attending data were compared against those of the novice attending. RESULTS: Regarding preoperative risks, experienced attending cases more likely involved 4+ cataract (P=0.005), Flomax (P<0.001), or glaucoma risk (P=0.001). For intraoperative risks, novice attending cases more likely involved Trypan blue (P<0.001). Regarding complications, novice attending cases were associated with vitreous loss (P=0.002) and anterior capsule tears (P<0.001). When comparing total complications, the novice attending was more likely to have both increased number of cases with complications and total complications than the experienced attending. The novice attending's overall complication rate trended downward (rate from 28% in first 25 cases to 6.67% in last 15). CONCLUSION: Early cases for the novice attending were accompanied by greater complications (vitreous loss and anterior capsule tear), likely due to a learning curve. Surgical judgment in the operating room likely develops with experience. Training programs may focus on these specific areas to aid new instructors.

An emergency department registration kiosk can increase HIV screening in high risk patients.

We evaluated the feasibility and the patient acceptability of integrating a kiosk into routine emergency department (ED) practice for offering HIV testing. The work was conducted in four phases: phase 1 was a baseline, in which external testing staff offered testing at the bedside; phase 2 was a pilot assessment of a prototype kiosk; phase 3 was a pilot implementation and phase 4 was the full implementation with automated login. Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of offering HIV tests, acceptance, completion and result reporting. During the study period, the number of ED patients and eligible patients for screening were similar in the three main phases. However, the number and proportion of patients offered testing of those eligible for screening increased significantly from phase 1 (32%) to phase 3 (37%) and phase 4 (40%). There were slightly higher prevalences of newly diagnosed HIV with kiosk versus bedside testing (phase 1, 0%; phase 3, 0.2%; phase 4, 0.5%). Compared to patients tested at the bedside, patients tested via the kiosk were significantly younger, more likely to be female, to be black, and to report high risk behaviours. ED-based HIV screening via a registration-based kiosk was feasible, yielded similar proportions of testing, and increased the proportion of engagement of higher-risk patients in testing.

Streamlining HIV testing in the emergency department-leveraging kiosks to provide true universal screening: a usability study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening programs are challenged by the unsustainable cost of exogenous staff and the relatively low penetration rates. Kiosk systems have increased registration efficiency in various clinical settings and have shown promising results for advancing various public health initiatives. This study evaluated the usability of kiosks within the existing HIV testing program and assessed patients' perceived acceptability of kiosk-based screening in the ED. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: ED patients (n=88) were asked to complete both a Registration Module (intended to integrate into the ED's pending kiosk registration system) and a Risk Assessment Module using a pen-based touchscreen tablet platform. Participants provided feedback upon program completion. All comments, questions, and errors were documented. Kiosk programs tracked time spent on each screen. Quantitative (chi-squared test or t test) and qualitative data analyses were performed. RESULTS: Consented subjects (n=62) were 60% female, 69% were black, the mean ± standard deviation age was 37.8 ± 11.4 years, 52% had a high school degree or less, and 50% reported no prior kiosk experience. Mean time spent on the Registration and Risk Assessment Modules was 2:35 ± 1:24 min and 5:09 ± 1:58 min, respectively. The leading technical challenge identified was login: 84% of patients required assistance. Removal of the login screen reduced times to 1:05 ± 0:36 min and 4:10 ± 1:38 min. Ninety-five percent of subjects reported length of use as "just right," and over 75% of patients found the software easy to use, answered questions without help, and preferred screening on the kiosk to in-person interviews. Favorite aspects of the program included ease of use (52%), privacy (48%), and speed (30%). Sixty-six percent of patients reported there was nothing they disliked or would change. CONCLUSIONS: ED patient response to the kiosk system was favorable. Subjects easily and quickly navigated the program, with the exception of a login screen, which could be eliminated via automated login using ID bracelet scanners.

Intraoperative phacoemulsification complication rates of second- and third-year ophthalmology residents a 5-year comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether year of residency is associated with intraoperative phacoemulsification complication rates. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: One attending physician supervised 691 resident-performed phacoemulsification procedures on 492 patients. Second- and third-year residents performed 228 and 463 cases, respectively. METHODS: All resident-performed phacoemulsification procedures performed between October 2003 and June 2008 and supervised by one attending surgeon (SR) were considered for this study. Data were collected on the residency year of the physician performing the surgery, preoperative risk indicators, and intraoperative complications, including anterior and posterior capsular tears with or without vitreous loss, zonular dialysis or dehiscence, burns, nuclear fragment loss, and Descemet's membrane tear. Cases were classified as difficult if they had 1 or more preoperative risk indicators including: pseudoexfoliation; proliferative diabetic retinopathy; prior vitrectomy; a 4+ dense, white, or brunescent cataract; current Flomax (Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany) use, pre-existing zonular dialysis; and intraoperative use of Trypan blue, iris hooks, or pupil dilator. Intraoperative complications are presented as rate per 100 surgeries (95% confidence intervals [CIs]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative complication rates and case difficulty. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients experienced at least 1 complication, with 25 cases experiencing multiple complications. Intraoperative complication rates were similar among second- and third-year resident groups (7.9% vs. 7.6%; P = 0.88). Similarly, vitreous loss rates among second- and third-year residents were comparable (4.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.27). Risk indicators were more common among third-year cases (24.6% vs. 15.8%; P = 0.008). Having 1 or more risk indicators increased the odds of an intraoperative complication (odds ratio [OR], 3.09; 95% CI, 1.73-5.49). After controlling for risk indicators, second-year resident surgeries still had a similar risk of intraoperative complications as third-year resident surgeries (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.6-2.19). CONCLUSIONS: The year of residency did not significantly influence intraoperative complication rates, even after controlling for differences in case difficulty.

QuickSNP: an automated web server for selection of tagSNPs.

Although large-scale genetic association studies involving hundreds to thousands of SNPs have become feasible, the associated cost is substantial. Even with the increased efficiency introduced by the use of tagSNPs, researchers are often seeking ways to maximize resource utilization given a set of SNP-based gene-mapping goals. We have developed a web server named QuickSNP in order to provide cost-effective selection of SNPs, and to fill in some of the gaps in existing SNP selection tools. One useful feature of QuickSNP is the option to select only gene-centric SNPs from a chromosomal region in an automated fashion. Other useful features include automated selection of coding non-synonymous SNPs, SNP filtering based on inter-SNP distances and information regarding the availability of genotyping assays for SNPs and whether they are present on whole genome chips. The program produces user-friendly summary tables and results, and a link to a UCSC Genome Browser track illustrating the position of the selected tagSNPs in relation to genes and other genomic features. We hope the unique combination of features of this server will be useful for researchers aiming to select markers for their genotyping studies. The server is freely available and can be accessed at the URL http://bioinformoodics.jhmi.edu/quickSNP.pl.