The novel use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for uncontrolled bleeding in a surgically inaccessible abdomen: The ruptured proper hepatic artery in a frozen abdomen.

Hemorrhage is among the leading causes of death for trauma patients. Adjunct techniques used to control bleeding include use of aortic cross clamping, application of a pelvic binder, rapidly expanding hemostatic sponges, and extra-peritoneal packing. Additionally, Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) can provide life-saving proximal control for patients with massive internal hemorrhage. This study concerns a patient treated with Zone 1 REBOA for class IV hemorrhagic shock from a spontaneous common hepatic artery rupture. REBOA was performed at bedside in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) prior to definitive selective embolization. A healthy 28-year-old male suffered a grade 4 liver laceration and pancreatic head transection with associated duodenal injury after a high-speed motor vehicle collision. On arrival, the patient required a damage control laparotomy with multiple reoperations for management of his intra-abdominal injuries. By hospital day 11, significant visceral adhesions resulted in a frozen abdomen. On hospital day 20, the patient developed massive hematemesis, hematochezia, and class IV hemorrhagic shock. Vascular surgery was called to bedside in the SICU to perform REBOA. The patient received massive transfusion protocol while a 12 Fr sheath was inserted, and an aortic occlusion balloon was inflated in Zone 1 allowing for hemodynamic stabilization for transport and definitive management in the angiography suite. This case reports a novel use of REBOA, at bedside in the SICU, for the management of a massive gastrointestinal bleed in a patient with frozen abdomen. In this case, REBOA allowed us to achieve temporary hemodynamic stability prior to definitive control in the angiography suite. Bedside use of REBOA in the SICU prevented certain exsanguination and death.

Increased Mortality in Patients Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center with Blunt and Penetrating Extremity Vascular Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Trauma care depends on a complex transfer system to ensure timely and adequate management at major trauma centers. Patient outcomes depend on the reliability of triage in local or community hospitals and access to tertiary or quaternary trauma institutions. Patients with polytrauma, extremity trauma, or vascular injuries require multidisciplinary management at trauma hospitals. Our study investigated outcomes in this population at a level one trauma center in San Bernardino County, the largest geographic county in the contiguous United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with extremity trauma who presented to a single level 1 trauma center over 10 years. The cohort was divided into following two groups: 1. transferred from another medical center for a higher level of care or 2. those who directly presented. Overall, 19,417 patients were identified, with 15,317 patients presenting directly and 3,830 patients transferred from an outside hospital. Extremity of vascular injuries was observed in 268 patients. Demographic data were ascertained, including the injury severity score, mechanism of injury, response level, arrival method, tertiary center emergency department disposition, and presence of vascular injury in the upper or lower extremities. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess patient mortality. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients with vascular injuries were analyzed, including 207 nontransferred and 61 transferred patients. In the univariate analysis, injury severity score means were compared at 11.4 in nontransferred patients versus 8.4 in transferred (P < 0.001), 50% of blunt injury in the nontransferred group, and 28% in the transferred group (P < 0.001); in-hospital mortality was 4% in nontransferred patients versus 28% in the transferred group (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that mortality is 8 times more likely if a patient with vascular extremity injuries is transferred from an outside hospital. A 10% mortality rate was observed in patients without blood transfusion within 4 hr of arrival to the trauma center and 3% mortality in transferred patients transfused blood. CONCLUSIONS: Extremity trauma with vascular injury can be lethal if managed appropriately. Patients transferred to our level 1 trauma center had a substantial increase in mortality compared with nontransferred patients. Furthermore, the transfer distance was associated with increased mortality. Further research is required to address this vulnerable patient population.

Emergent needle thoracostomy in prehospital trauma patients: a review of procedural execution through computed tomography scans.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic tension pneumothoraces (TPT) are among the most serious causes of death in traumatic injuries, requiring immediate treatment with a needle thoracostomy (NT). Improperly placed NT insertion into the pleural cavity may fail to treat a life-threatening TPT. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of prehospital NT placements by paramedics in adult trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 84 consecutive trauma patients who had received NT by prehospital personnel. The primary outcome was the accuracy of NT placement by prehospital personnel. Comparisons of various variables were conducted between those who survived and those who died, and proper versus improper needle insertion separately. RESULTS: Proper NT placement into the pleural cavity was noted in 27.4% of adult trauma patients. In addition, more than 19% of the procedures performed by the prehospital providers appeared to have not been medically indicated. DISCUSSION: Long-term strategies may be needed to improve the capabilities and performance of prehospital providers' capabilities in this delicate life-saving procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Impact of Obesity on Mortality in Adult Trauma Patients.

Introduction Trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality amongst all populations in the United States. With the widespread increase of obesity in the United States, studies have been conducted to compare different body mass index (BMI) groups and their clinical outcomes for traumatic injuries. The goal of this study was to retrospectively compare mortality between adult trauma patients with a high BMI to those with a lower BMI as well as investigate whether the mechanism of trauma had an effect on the outcome. Methods This study was a retrospective review of all adult trauma patients presented to the emergency department at Arrowhead Regional Medical Center (ARMC) between January 2014 and October 2019. The outcome was all-cause mortality. Patients were grouped according to BMI and mechanisms of injury, including blunt trauma, low velocity penetrating trauma, and high velocity penetrating trauma. Patients were also stratified by injury severity scores (ISS). Results Among the 9642 patients assessed in this study, majority (88%) of patients sustained blunt trauma. The number of patients among the three different BMI groups was appropriately equal with 34.4% of normal BMI, 34.6% overweight, and 31.1% obese. The overall mortality of all patients studied was 2.6% (n=248). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality among the three different BMI groups for blunt trauma, penetrating trauma, and subgroup analyses stratified by ISS score (ISS<16 or ISS ≥ 16). Conclusion Our study found no statistically significant differences in mortality among the three BMI groups in regard to mortality, even when stratified by ISS, or mechanism of injury, and traumatic velocities.

The Effect of Physician-Led Enhanced Care Teams in Prehospital Trauma Resuscitation.

Trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for those under 45 years of age in the United States with half of the deaths in trauma being attributed to hemorrhagic shock. The use of enhanced care teams (ECTs) that include physicians in selective prehospital settings has allowed the delivery of advanced critical care interventions in the field. We present a unique case where a young driver involved in a motor vehicle accident was trapped under the weight of his vehicle, causing extended extrication time. An ECT from the closest trauma center was able to deliver massive transfusion and definitive airway care while the patient was being extricated. While previous literature regarding the benefit of ECTs has been debated, this case suggests a unique niche where rapid deployment of an ECT to the scene made a pronounced difference in survival of the patient.

Navigating the Next Accreditation System: A Dashboard for the Milestones.

INTRODUCTION: In July 2014, all residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) were enrolled in a new system called the Next Accreditation System. Residency programs may not be clear on how best to comply with these new accreditation requirements. Large amounts of data must be collected, evaluated, and submitted twice a year to the council's Web-based data collection system. One challenge is that the new "end-of-rotation" evaluations must reflect specialty-specific milestones, on which many faculty members are not well versed. Like other residency programs, we tried to address the challenges using our local resources. METHODS: We used our existing electronic goals and objectives for each rotation coupled with appropriate end-of-rotation evaluations reflecting the specialty-specific milestones through a process of editing and mapping. RESULTS: Data extracted from these evaluations were added to an interactive dashboard that also contained evaluations on additional program-specific modifiers of residents' performance. A resident's final overall performance was visually represented on a plot graph. The novel dashboard included features to save evaluations for future comparisons and to track residents' progress during their entire training. It proved simple to use and was able to reduce the time needed for each resident evaluation to 5 to 10 minutes. CONCLUSION: This tool has made it much easier and less challenging for the members of our Clinical Competency Committee to start deliberation about each resident's performance.

Bilateral laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair without mesh fixation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mesh fixation during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair is thought to be necessary to prevent recurrence. However, mesh fixation may increase postoperative chronic pain. This study aimed to describe the experience of a single surgeon at our institution performing this operation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent bilateral laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair without mesh fixation for inguinal hernia from January 2005 to December 2011. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were obtained for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients underwent simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of 686 primary and recurrent inguinal hernias from January 2005 to December 2011. The mean operative time was 33 minutes. One patient was converted to an open approach (0.3%), and 1 patient had intraoperative bladder injury. Postoperative hematoma/seroma occurred in 5 patients (1.5%), wound infection in 1 (0.3%), hematuria in 2 (0.6%), and acute myocardial infarction in 1 (0.3%). Chronic pain developed postoperatively in 9 patients (2.6%); 3 of them underwent re-exploration. All patients were discharged home a few hours after surgery except for 3 patients. Among the 686 hernia repairs, there were a total of 20 recurrences (2.9%) in 18 patients (5.2%). Two patients had bilateral recurrences, whereas 16 had unilateral recurrences. Twelve of the recurrences occurred after 1 year (60%). Fourteen recurrences occurred among direct hernias (70%). CONCLUSION: Compared with the literature, our patients had fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications, less chronic pain, and no increase in operative time or length of hospital stay but had a slight increase in recurrence rate.

What can we learn from narratives in medical education?

Medical literature has demonstrated the effectiveness of narrative writing in enhancing self-reflection and empathy, which opens the door for deeper understanding of patients' experiences of illness. Similarly, it promotes practitioner well-being. Therefore, it is no surprise that narrative writing finds a new home in medical education. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), through its Outcome Project, established six core competencies that every residency program must teach. However, no specific pedagogies were suggested. We explored the role that narrative writing can play in reconciling the ACGME core competencies with daily encounters in medical education. Our study suggests a hidden wealth in reflective writing through narratives with a promising potential for application in medical education. Reflective writing may turn out to be an innovative tool for teaching and evaluating ACGME core competencies.