Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Psychol Serv ; 19(2): 206-212, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33661696

ABSTRACT

Consistent with nationwide trends, the number of defendants judicially ordered to the California Department of State Hospitals (DSH) for competency restoration has nearly doubled in recent years. Previous research has shown that the majority of the time, judicial rulings on competency reflect forensic evaluators' opinions. Thus, the quality of competency to stand trial (CST) reports is critical. We examined 388 CST reports from defendants who were ultimately found incompetent to stand trial and admitted to a state hospital for restoration in 2012-2013. We evaluated the reports for adherence to both professional guidelines and current literature on the appropriate conduct of CST evaluations. Consistent with previous studies, our results showed that the reports evidenced overall poor quality and evaluators were largely unable to accurately describe the nature of the mental illness or explain how clinical factors (i.e., diagnoses or symptoms) impacted CST abilities. Notably, we found that experts board certified in psychiatry or psychology produced reports of higher quality. These findings demonstrate the continued poor quality of CST reports and highlight the importance of training. As in previous similar studies, we recommend mandatory training for experts conducting CST evaluations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Forensic Psychiatry , Mental Disorders , Databases, Factual , Humans , Mental Competency , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy
2.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 200(5): 380-7, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22551790

ABSTRACT

The frequency of mania has not changed during the last century even with the development of new diagnostic criteria sets. More specifically, from the mid-1970s to 2000, the rate of mania (variably labeled major affective disorder-bipolar disorder and bipolar I disorder) was consistently identified in US and international studies as ranging from 0.4% to 1.6%. By the late 1990s to the 2000s, the prevalence reported by some researchers for bipolar disorders (I and II and others) was in the 5% to 7% and higher ranges. The purpose of this paper was to review explanations for this change and the potentially negative impacts on the field.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Advertising , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/etiology , Depression/drug therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Drug Industry , Humans , Informed Consent , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...