Individual-Level and Community-Level Predictors of Healthy Pregnancy Outcomes in Multigravid Black Women.

OBJECTIVE: To identify individual- and community-level factors that predict the odds of multigravid Black women having consecutive pregnancies without adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of 515 multigravid Black women from a longitudinal observational study (2017-2019). We assessed the presence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, and pregnancy loss) for the index and prior pregnancies. We examined U.S. Census data, medical records, and surveys across multiple socioecologic domains: personal, behavioral, socioeconomic, and policy. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs for the association between individual- and community-level factors and consecutive healthy pregnancies using hierarchical logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), gravidity, interpregnancy interval, and median household income. RESULTS: Among 515 multigravid Black women (age 27±5 years, BMI 31.4±8.9, gravidity 4±2), 38.4% had consecutive healthy pregnancies without adverse pregnancy outcomes. Individual-level factors associated with consecutive healthy pregnancies included normal glucose tolerance (aOR 3.9, 95% CI, 1.2-12.1); employment (aOR 1.9, 95% CI, 1.2-2.9); living in communities with favorable health indicators for diabetes, hypertension, and physical activity; and household income of $50,000 per year or more (aOR 3.5, 95% CI, 1.4-8.7). When individual and community factors were modeled together, only income and employment at the individual and community levels remained significant. CONCLUSION: Individual and community income and employment are associated with consecutive healthy pregnancies in a cohort of Black patients, emphasizing the need for comprehensive, multilevel systems interventions to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes for Black women.

Impact of the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Symptoms.

IMPORTANCE: The associated effect of duration of the second stage of labor (SSL) on pelvic floor symptoms development is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between duration of SSL and pelvic floor symptoms at 6 months postpartum among primiparous women. STUDY DESIGN: A planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial evaluating the impact of immediate versus delayed pushing on vaginal delivery rates, maternal morbidity, and neonatal outcomes was conducted between 2014 and 2018. For pelvic floor arm participants, demographic, pelvic examination, and validated questionnaire data were collected postpartum. Primary outcome was change in Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) score from immediate to 6 months postpartum. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire scores, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurements at 6 months postpartum. Participants were analyzed by SSL duration ≤60 minutes or >60 minutes. RESULTS: Of the 2,414 trial participants, 767 (32%) completed pelvic floor assessments at 6 months. Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 scores significantly improved at 6 months in the ≤60 minutes SSL group compared with >60 minutes SSL (-14.3 ± 48.0 and -3.2 ± 45.3, respectively; P = 0.04). Changes from immediate postpartum in total and subscale scores for other questionnaires at 6 months did not differ between groups. Prolapse stage did not differ between groups. Perineal body was significantly shorter in the >60 minutes SSL group (3.7 ± 0.7, 3.5 ± 0.8; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Women with SSL >60 minutes experience less improvement in PFDI-20 scores at 6 months. Greater tissue and innervation trauma in those with SSL >60 minutes may explain persistently less improvement in PFDI-20 scores.

First and Second Stage Risk Factors Associated with Perineal Lacerations.

OBJECTIVE: To determine intrapartum factors associated with perineal laceration at delivery. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of delayed versus immediate pushing among term nulliparous women in labor with neuraxial analgesia conducted in the United States. Intrapartum characteristics were extracted from the medical charts. The primary outcome was perineal laceration, defined as second degree or above, characterized at delivery in women participating in longer term pelvic floor assessments post-delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to refine risk estimates while adjusting for randomization group, birth weight, and maternal age. RESULTS: Among the 941 women participating in the pelvic floor follow-up, 40.6% experienced a perineal laceration. No first stage labor characteristics were associated with perineal laceration, including type of labor or length of first stage. Receiving an amnioinfusion appeared protective of perineal laceration (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.91; P = 0.01). Second stage labor characteristics associated with injury were length of stage (2.01 h vs. 1.50 h; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.57; P < 0.01) and a prolonged second stage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.56; P < 0.01). Operative vaginal delivery was strongly associated with perineal laceration (adjusted odds ratio, 3.57; 95% confidence interval 1.85-6.90; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Operative vaginal delivery is a modifiable risk factor associated with an increased risk of perineal laceration. Amnioinfusion appeared protective against injury, which could reflect a spurious finding, but may also represent true risk reduction similar to the mechanism of warm perineal compress.

Attitudes Toward Medication for Opioid Use Disorder Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women and People Seeking Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Pregnant and postpartum women and people (PPWP) who use opioids experience higher rates of morbidity, preterm labor, and stillbirth than those who do not. Although medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the standard of treatment, utilization among PPWP has remained low because of MOUD stigma and misconceptions. The current report examined general and pregnancy-related MOUD attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy among PPWP seeking treatment. METHODS: Participants (n = 33) receiving MOUD at a Midwestern clinic reported beliefs about MOUD in general using the Attitudes toward Methadone Questionnaire (modified to include all MOUD) and during pregnancy/postpartum using an investigator-generated scale based on previous research. Participants responded using a 5-point scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes. Analyses examined the bivariate association of attitudes with MOUD subjective norms and self-efficacy, also measured via investigator-generated scales. RESULTS: Respondents reported positive attitudes toward MOUD use during pregnancy, with most agreeing it was safe. However, up-to-half of participants reported uncertainty regarding the appropriate dosage of MOUD and its impact on the fetus and/or neonate. Both general and pregnancy/postpartum-related MOUD attitudes were positively associated with subjective norms toward MOUD. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant and postpartum women and people reported high uncertainty about MOUD use despite currently using it, emphasizing the need for strategies that assess and mitigate MOUD-related stigma. Findings suggest that familial support and stigma impact attitudes toward MOUD and highlight the importance of accurate psychoeducation and social supports for patients and their families to improve the acceptance and utilization of MOUD among PPWP.

Video Instruction for Pushing in the Second Stage: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The second stage of labor requires active patient engagement. Previous studies suggest that coaching can influence the second stage of labor duration. However, a standardized education tool has not been established, and patients face many barriers to accessing childbirth education before delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of an intrapartum video pushing education tool on the second stage of labor duration. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial of nulliparous patients with singleton pregnancies ≥37 weeks of gestation admitted for induction of labor or spontaneous labor with neuraxial anesthesia. Patients were consented on admission and block randomized in active labor to 1 of 2 arms in a 1:1 ratio. The study arm viewed a 4-minute video before the second stage of labor on what to anticipate in the second stage of labor and pushing techniques. The control arm received the standard of care: bedside coaching at 10 cm dilation from a nurse or physician. The primary outcome was second stage of labor duration. The secondary outcomes were birth satisfaction (using the Modified Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale), mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, clinical chorioamnionitis, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and umbilical artery gases. Of note, 156 patients were needed to detect a 20% decrease in the second stage of labor duration with 80% power, 2-sided alpha level of .05, and 10% loss after randomization. Funding was provided by the Lucy Anarcha Betsy award from the division of clinical research at Washington University. RESULTS: Of 161 patients, 81 were randomized to standard of care, and 80 were randomized to intrapartum video education. Among these patients, 149 progressed to the second stage of labor and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 69 in the video group and 78 in the control group. Maternal demographics and labor characteristics were similar between groups. The second stage of labor duration was statistically similar between the video arm (61 minutes [interquartile range, 20-140]) and the control arm (49 minutes [interquartile range, 27-131]) (P=.77). There was no difference in mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, clinical chorioamnionitis, neonatal intensive care unit admission, or umbilical artery gases between groups. Although the overall birth satisfaction score on the Modified Mackey Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale was similar between groups, patients in the video group rated their "level of comfort during birth" and "attitude of the doctors in birth" significantly higher or more positively than patients in the control group (P<.05 for both). CONCLUSION: Intrapartum video education was not associated with a shorter second stage of labor duration. However, patients who received video education reported a higher level of comfort and a more favorable perception of their physician, suggesting that video education may be a helpful tool to improve the birth experience.

Effect of Second-Stage Pushing Timing on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Morbidity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether immediate or delayed pushing in the second-stage results in higher risk of pelvic floor morbidity. METHODS: This study was a planned secondary aim of a multicenter randomized clinical trial that included nulliparous patients at 37 weeks of gestation or greater in labor with neuraxial analgesia. Participants were randomized in the second stage to initiate pushing immediately or wait 60 minutes before pushing. Participants had pelvic floor assessments at 1-5 days postpartum, 6 weeks postpartum, and 6 months postpartum. Rates of perineal lacerations, pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) measures, and scores on validated symptom-specific distress and quality-of-life questionnaires (PFDI-20 [Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory], PFIQ [Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire], FISI [Fecal Incontinence Severity Index], and MMHQ [Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire]) were compared. It was estimated that 630 participants would provide more than 80% power to detect a 40% difference in second-degree or greater perineal lacerations and approximately 80% power to detect a 40% difference in stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse (POP). RESULTS: Among 2,414 participants in the primary trial conducted between May 19, 2014, and December 16, 2017, 941 (39%) had pelvic floor assessments: 452 immediate pushing and 489 delayed pushing. The mean age was 24.8 years, and 93.4% had vaginal delivery. There were no significant differences in perineal lacerations at delivery and POP at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Changes from baseline in total and subscale scores for the PFDI-20, the PFIQ, and the MMHQ were not significantly different at 6 weeks postpartum and 6 months postpartum. The change in FISI score was higher in the immediate pushing group at 6 months (2.9±5.7 vs 2.0±4.5, difference 0.9, P =.01), but less than the minimum important difference of 4. CONCLUSION: Among nulliparous patients in the second stage with neuraxial analgesia, immediate pushing, compared with delayed pushing, did not increase perineal lacerations, POP-Q measures, or patient-reported pelvic floor symptoms at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02137200.

To Prescribe or Not to Prescribe?: Barriers and Motivators for Progressing Along Each Stage of the Buprenorphine Training and Prescribing Path.

This study aimed to identify the strongest barriers and motivators associated with each step toward buprenorphine prescribing (1. obtaining a waiver, 2. beginning to prescribe, and 3. prescribing to more people) among a sample of Missouri-based medical professionals (N = 130). Item weights (number of endorsements times mean rank of the item's importance) were calculated based on their responses. Across groups, lack of access to psychosocial support services, need for higher levels of care, and clinical complexity were strong barriers. Among non-prescribers (n = 57, 46.3%), administrative burden, potential of becoming an addiction clinic, and concern about misuse and diversion were most heavily weighted. Among prescribers (n = 66, 53.7%), patients' inability to afford medications was a barrier across phases. Prominent motivators among all groups were the effectiveness of buprenorphine, improvement in other health outcomes, and a personal interest in treating addiction. Only prescribers reported the presence of institutional support and mentors as significant motivators.

Urine Drug Screening for Isolated Marijuana Use in Labor and Delivery Units.

Isolated marijuana use is frequently used as an indication for urine drug screening in labor and delivery units. We aimed to identify the results of urine drug screening in a labor and delivery unit for isolated marijuana use. This retrospective cohort study reviewed data from patients admitted for delivery at an urban academic center from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. Patients undergoing urine drug screening for isolated marijuana use were more likely to be younger (median age 25 vs 29 years, P <.001), more often Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.58, 95% CI 1.94-3.41), and more likely to have public insurance (aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.21-1.95). A few (5/338, 1.5%) urine drug screening tests performed for isolated marijuana use were positive for substances besides marijuana. Most patients (177/197, 89.8%) with a urine drug screening test result that was positive for marijuana were reported to the state child abuse hotline. The utility of isolated marijuana use as a criterion for urine drug screening thus appears limited in benefit but rife with inequitable potential to harm.

Intrapartum risk factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse at 6 months postpartum.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy and childbirth are known risk factors associated with the development of pelvic organ prolapse; specific intrapartum risk factors are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine intrapartum factors associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse identified after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of delayed vs immediate pushing among nulliparous women at ≥37 weeks of gestation in labor with neuraxial analgesia was conducted at 6 academic and community hospitals in the United States. Intrapartum characteristics were identified, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessments at 6 weeks and 6 months after delivery were performed. The primary outcome was pelvic organ prolapse, defined as stage 2 or greater prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessment at 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to refine risk estimates while adjusting for randomization group, macrosomia, and maternal age. RESULTS: Among the 941 women participating in the pelvic floor follow-up, 793 women had Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessments at 6 weeks with 91 of 793 women (11.5%) demonstrating stage 2 or greater prolapse. Of the 728 women followed up at 6 months, stage 2 or greater prolapse was identified in 58 of 728 women (8.0%). Prostaglandin use for induction of labor was associated with an increased risk at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.91; P<.01). The length and type (spontaneous vs induced) of the first stage of labor were not significantly associated with stage 2 or greater prolapse. Moreover, increased length of the second stage of labor and duration of pushing were not associated with stage 2 or greater prolapse. After adjusting for confounding factors, cesarean delivery was protective of pelvic organ prolapse at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.90). CONCLUSION: The management of the first and second stages of labor, including time length, was not associated with stage 2 or greater prolapse at 6 months. The findings that prostaglandin exposure was associated with increased risk likely were not directly affecting the risk of prolapse but may be surrogates for other labor features that deserve exploration. Cesarean delivery was associated with protection from stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse at 6 months, consistent with previous literature.

Impact of pushing timing on occult injury of levator ani: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of detachment of the levator ani muscle system is seen more frequently in patients with pelvic floor disorders. It has been suggested that passive descent of the fetus before pushing could be used to decrease operative vaginal delivery and levator ani muscle injury. OBJECTIVE: This planned analysis aimed to determine whether immediate or delayed pushing was associated with an increased proportion of injury to the levator ani muscle system after the first delivery among nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: The Optimizing Management of the Second Stage study was a multicenter randomized trial. Nulliparous women with term pregnancies and neuraxial analgesia were randomly assigned at complete cervical dilation to either immediate pushing or delayed pushing for 1 hour. A subset of participants consented to longitudinal objective pelvic floor assessments: (1) during postpartum stay (initial), (2) at 6 weeks (postpartum 1), and (3) at 6 months (postpartum 2) with transperineal 3-dimensional ultrasound. Following the completion of all visits by all subjects, saved 3-dimensional ultrasound volumes were assessed in a masked fashion. The outcome was "occult" levator ani muscle injury on the right or left, defined as a widening of the attachment of the levator ani to its origin utilizing the levator-urethra gap measurement. Measurements and proportions were compared between the 2 groups by study visit using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables as appropriate. RESULTS: Here, 941 of 2414 randomized subjects (39.0%) participated in the pelvic floor assessments: 452 in the immediate pushing group and 489 in the delayed pushing group. We obtained sonograms on 67%, 83%, and 77% of the pelvic floor assessment participants at the initial, postpartum 1, and postpartum-2 visits, respectively. Demographic and labor characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups; 94% of participants were non-Hispanic, and 50% of participants were Black. Levator ani muscle injury was noted in 77 participants (13.6%) at the initial visit, 99 (13.1%) at PP1, and 72 (10.6%) at PP2. There was no difference in injury between women in the immediate pushing group and women in the delayed pushing group. These findings did not change when the threshold (sensitivity) of levator ani muscle injury was adjusted to a less conservative measure. CONCLUSION: Among nulliparous women at term with neuraxial analgesia, the rates of occult levator ani muscle injury were not different between women undergoing immediate pushing and women undergoing delayed pushing in the second stage of labor. Further research efforts are needed to understand the development and potential prevention of subsequent pelvic floor disorders.

Vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in women with arrested preterm labor.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that administration of vaginal progesterone in women with arrested preterm labor would result in lower rates of preterm birth <37 weeks compared to placebo. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing vaginal progesterone to placebo in women with arrested preterm labor. Our trial included women with a singleton or twin gestation at 240/7-336/7 weeks' gestation who presented with preterm labor with cervical dilation ≥1 centimeter but remained undelivered. Participants were randomized to receive vaginal progesterone 200 mg daily or an identical placebo. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials, including our results. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, Scopus, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the key terms to identify relevant trials. The risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Data were synthesized using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2. RESULTS: The randomized trial was prematurely terminated due to slow recruitment. There were 18 women randomized to receive vaginal progesterone who had complete follow-up data and 18 women in the placebo group. The risk of preterm birth <37 weeks was not significantly different in the groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.63-1.19). Secondary outcomes were also similar. Thirteen trials with 1658 women (835 in the vaginal progesterone and 823 in the control groups) were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of preterm birth <37 weeks was similar in women who received progesterone and those in the control group (pooled RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83-1.35). Latency was significantly longer among women with arrested preterm labor who received vaginal progesterone (weighted mean difference: 9.2 d, 95% CI 3.2-15.1), but further analysis showed that prolonged latency was only observed in the subgroup of studies that were not placebo-controlled. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis do not support the use of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women who present in preterm labor.

Defining the risk profile of women with stage 1 hypertension: a time to event analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hypertension complicates up to 5% of pregnancies and is increasing in prevalence. Women with hypertension have increased risks of serious maternal morbidity and mortality in pregnancy, including the development of preeclampsia. In 2017, new guidelines reclassified blood pressure into the following 4 categories: normal (<120/<80 mm Hg), elevated (120-129/<80 mm Hg), stage 1 hypertension (130-139/80-89 mm Hg), and stage 2 hypertension (>140/>90 mm Hg). This new classification doubles the number of reproductive-aged women with hypertension. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that women entering pregnancy with stage 1 hypertension have an increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with their normotensive counterparts, but the time course to the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in these women remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the risk of developing a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and the time to the development of these disorders in women with stage 1 hypertension vs both normotensive women and those with stage 2 hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients from a single tertiary care center with singleton gestations from 2014 to 2016. Patients at prenatal visits before 20 weeks of gestation were classified into 3 blood pressure groups: normotensive (<130/80 mm Hg), stage 1 hypertension (130-139/80-89 mm Hg), or stage 2 hypertension (≥140/90 or a history of chronic hypertension). The primary outcome, time to the development of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, was compared among groups using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to adjust for age, race and ethnicity, pregestational diabetes mellitus, and body mass index. In addition, multiple secondary obstetrical, maternal, and neonatal outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 3000 women in our cohort, 2370 (79.0%) were categorized in the normotensive group, 315 (10.5%) were categorized in the stage 1 hypertension group, and 315 (10.5%) were categorized in the stage 2 hypertension group. The gestational age at diagnosis was significantly earlier in gestation among blood pressure groups (normotensive [38.7 (37.0-39.7)] vs stage 1 hypertension [38.0 (36.4-39.4)] vs stage 2 hypertension [36.4 (33.7-37.8)]; P<.001). When the analysis was restricted to only those patients diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features, the same findings were observed. Women with stage 1 hypertension exhibited a 2-fold increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with normotensive women. Compared with women with stage 2 hypertension, women with stage 1 hypertension exhibited a milder phenotype of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and exhibited significantly less risk of maternal and neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSION: Women with stage 1 hypertension are at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at earlier gestational ages compared with normotensive women; however, their development of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is skewed toward milder diseases compared with women with stage 2 hypertension. These new insights into the graded risk profile of obstetrical hypertensive diseases associated with new blood pressure categories can better inform our antepartum counseling and monitoring and surveillance plans near term and in the postpartum period.

Cervical cancer risk and screening among women seeking assistance with basic needs.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, more than half of cervical cancers occur in women who are inadequately screened. Interventions to improve access to cervical cancer preventive care is critical to reduce health inequities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the need for cervical cancer screening among women seeking assistance with basic needs and to assess best approaches to facilitate Papanicolaou test referral. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of low-income female callers to 2-1-1 Missouri, a helpline for local health and social services. The need for cervical cancer screening was assessed. Callers were randomized to 1 of 3 arms, each providing a Papanicolaou test referral: verbal referral only, verbal referral and tailored print reminder, or verbal referral and navigator. The primary outcome was contacting a Papanicolaou test referral 1 month following intervention. Student t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze significant differences in continuous variables, whereas Fisher exact or χ2 tests were used for categorical variables. We stratified by number of unmet basic needs (0-1 vs ≥2) and compared success of contacting a Papanicolaou test referral among study groups (verbal referral vs tailored reminder vs navigator) using the Fisher exact test and χ2 test, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for nonadherence for Papanicolaou test at baseline and at 1 month follow-up, adjusting for race and ethnicity, age, insurance status, self-rated health, smoking, and study group. RESULTS: Among 932 female callers, 250 (26.8%) needed cervical cancer screening. The frequency of unmet basic needs was high, the most common being lack of money for unexpected expenses (91.2%) and necessities, such as food, shelter, and clothing (73.2%). Among those needing a Papanicolaou test, 211 women received screening referrals. Women in the navigator group (21 of 71, 29.6%) reported higher rates of contacting a Papanicolaou test referral than those exposed to verbal referral only (11/73, 15.1%) or verbal referral and tailored print reminder (9/67, 13.4%) (P=.03). Among 176 women with ≥2 unmet needs who received a Papanicolaou test referral, the provision of a navigator remained associated with contacting the referral (navigator [33.9%] vs verbal referral [17.2%] vs tailored reminder [10.2%]; P=.005). Assignment to the navigator group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-8.5) and nonwhite race (adjusted odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.8) were independent predictors of contacting a Papanicolaou test referral. CONCLUSION: Low-income women seeking assistance with basic needs often lack cervical cancer screening. Health navigators triple the likelihood that women will make contact with Papanicolaou test services, but most 2-1-1 callers still fail to schedule Papanicolaou testing despite assistance from navigators. Interventions beyond health navigators are needed to reduce cervical cancer disparities.

Prostaglandins and cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status in patients delivering small-for-gestational age neonates at term.

Objective: Growth-restricted fetuses have been excluded from many randomized trials of prostaglandins for labor induction. As prostaglandins, particularly misoprostol, are associated with increased rates of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart tracing, it is important to assess their safety in pregnancies at higher risk of this complication. The objective of this study was to estimate the association between use of prostaglandins for labor induction in term singleton pregnancies complicated by delivery of small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates and the risk of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS).Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries ≥37 weeks following induction of labor in patients with SGA (birthweight <10% percentile for gestational age). Patients with prior cesarean delivery or neonates with major congenital anomalies were excluded. Patients were categorized by exposure to prostaglandins. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery for NRFS. Secondary outcomes were any cesarean delivery, a composite of a 5-min Apgar score <7, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, or neonatal death, and a composite of maternal morbidity (transfusion, postpartum hemorrhage, wound infection, endometritis, fever). Propensity scores for exposure were estimated using a logistic regression model, including parity, comorbidities, and Bishop score. Stabilized weights from inverse probability of treatment weighting were used. Outcomes were compared with relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: There were 1097 patients: 587 (53.5%) exposed to prostaglandins and 510 (46.5%) unexposed. Covariates were balanced in the stabilized sample. Overall, 166 (15.1%) patients had cesarean deliveries for NRFS. In unadjusted analysis, prostaglandin use was associated with an increased RR of cesarean for NRFS (18.3 versus 11.0%, RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.27-2.30). In propensity-score-weighted analysis, the RR for cesarean for NRFS was 1.22 (95% CI: 0.93-1.59). There was no significant association between prostaglandin exposure and all-cause cesarean delivery, maternal morbidity, or neonatal morbidity.Conclusion: In propensity score analysis, there was no association between the use of prostaglandins for labor induction at term and cesarean for NRFS in pregnancies complicated by SGA. However, given the retrospective nature of the study, these results should be interpreted with caution.

What role should maternal-fetal medicine physicians play in the era of abortion restriction?

In 2019, a total of 25 abortion bans were signed into law by states in the Southeast and Midwest. As of May 2019, 33 states have passed laws restricting or limiting abortion services, including "trigger laws" that make abortion illegal in the event that Roe v. Wade is overturned. In addition, 9 states have passed extreme abortion laws, such as making abortion illegal early in gestation (as early as 6-8 weeks' gestation), which are all currently enjoined and not in effect. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Society of Family Planning agree that access to abortion is essential to women's health and oppose legislation that directly affects the patient-physician relationship. It is time for maternal-fetal medicine physicians to play a more active role in the fight for abortion access. A 2012 study of maternal-fetal medicine physicians found only 31% of respondents performed dilation and evacuation for termination of pregnancies, predominantly based on whether the provider was trained in dilation and evacuation procedures during fellowship. We performed a 2018 survey of all maternal-fetal medicine fellows and program directors and found that more than two-thirds (62 of 90 [68.9%]) of fellows desire dilation and evacuation training; however, only 9 of 39 (23.1%) program directors believe dilation and evacuation training should be required. The maternal-fetal medicine community is well positioned to improve access to abortion services in the United States by prioritizing dilation and evacuation training for fellows and actively participating in reproductive health advocacy.

Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Obesity increases the risk of both cesarean delivery and surgical-site infection. Despite widespread use, it is unclear whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery in obese women. Objective: To evaluate whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, initiated immediately after cesarean delivery, lowers the risk of surgical-site infections compared with standard wound dressing in obese women. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 8, 2017, through November 13, 2019, at 4 academic and 2 community hospitals across the United States. Obese women undergoing planned or unplanned cesarean delivery were eligible. The study was terminated after 1624 of 2850 participants were recruited when a planned interim analysis showed increased adverse events in the negative pressure group and futility for the primary outcome. Final follow-up was December 18, 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to either undergo prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, with application of the negative pressure device immediately after repair of the surgical incision (n = 816), or receive standard wound dressing (n = 808). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was superficial or deep surgical-site infection according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Secondary outcomes included other wound complications, composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications, and adverse skin reactions. Results: Of the 1624 women randomized (mean age, 30.4 years, mean body mass index, 39.5), 1608 (99%) completed the study: 806 in the negative pressure group (median duration of negative pressure, 4 days) and 802 in the standard dressing group. Superficial or deep surgical-site infection was diagnosed in 29 participants (3.6%) in the negative pressure group and 27 (3.4%) in the standard dressing group (difference, 0.36%; 95% CI, -1.46% to 2.19%, P = .70). Of 30 prespecified secondary end points, 25 showed no significant differences, including other wound complications (2.6% vs 3.1%; difference, -0.53%; 95% CI, -1.93% to 0.88%; P = .46) and composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications (6.5% vs 6.7%; difference, -0.27%; 95% CI, -2.71% to 2.25%; P = .83). Adverse skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the negative pressure group (7.0% vs 0.6%; difference, 6.95%; 95% CI, 1.86% to 12.03%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, compared with standard wound dressing, did not significantly reduce the risk of surgical-site infection. These findings do not support routine use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women after cesarean delivery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03009110.

Association of abnormal first stage of labor duration and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary guidelines for labor management do not characterize abnormal labor on the basis of maternal and/or neonatal morbidity. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association of abnormal duration of the first stage of term labor and the risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all consecutive women admitted for delivery at a single center at ≥37 weeks and 0 to 7 days of gestation with singleton, nonanomalous, vertex infants from 2010 to 2015, who reached 10 cm cervical dilation. Multivariable logistic regression compared odds ratios for maternal and neonatal outcomes among women above and below the 90th, 95th, and 97th percentiles for first stage of labor duration. Receiver operating characteristic curves estimated the association between first stage of labor duration and maternal morbidity. Maternal morbidity was a composite of maternal fever, hemorrhage, transfusion, or endomyometritis; prolonged second stage of labor duration; and third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Neonatal morbidity was a composite of hypothermic therapy, need for mechanical ventilation, respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, birth injury or trauma, and neonatal seizure or sepsis. RESULTS: Of 6823 women included in this study, 682 were anticipated to have first stage of labor duration above the 90th percentile cutoff point, which was associated with an increased risk of composite maternal morbidity, maternal fever, postpartum transfusion, prolonged second stage of labor duration, third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration, and cesarean or operative vaginal delivery (P≤.02) and an increased risk of composite neonatal morbidity, respiratory distress syndrome, need for mechanical ventilation, and neonatal sepsis (P≤.03). Composite maternal morbidity was 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.7), 1.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.4), and 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.5) times more likely to occur among women above the 90th, 95th, and 97th percentile, respectively, for first stage of labor duration from 4 to 10 cm. Composite neonatal morbidity was 2.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.1-3.2), 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.9), and 1.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.8) times more likely to occur among infants delivered by women above the 90th, 95th, and 97th percentiles for first stage of labor duration from 4 to 10 cm. Receiver operating characteristic curves among all women from 4 to 10 cm and 6 to 10 cm, including when stratified by parity and type of labor onset, had an area under the curve of 0.51 to 0.62 and 0.53 to 0.71 for maternal and neonatal morbidity, respectively. Thus, duration of labor has moderate predictive ability, at best, for composite maternal or neonatal morbidity. No curve demonstrated a clear point at which adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes increased that could be used to define abnormal labor. CONCLUSION: The benefit of expectantly managing a prolonged first stage of labor with duration above the 90th percentile in anticipation of vaginal delivery must be weighed against the increased risk of composite maternal and neonatal morbidity. Risks associated with performing cesarean delivery as an alternative management for women with prolonged first stage of labor duration must also be considered.

A new definition of gestational hypertension? New-onset blood pressures of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic criteria for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy have historically been based on the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology's definition of hypertension, previously defined as a blood pressure of ≥140/90 mm Hg. With the recent redefinition of hypertension, blood pressures of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg are now considered abnormal. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to test whether the new-onset blood pressure elevations of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation in previously normotensive women are associated with increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, specifically the development of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center of all women who delivered singleton gestations after 20 weeks of gestation from January 01, 2014, to June 08, 2016. Normotensive patients were defined as having maximum blood pressure of <130/80 mm Hg before 20 weeks of gestation and no previous diagnosis of chronic hypertension. Patients who remained normotensive for the remainder of pregnancy were then compared with patients who developed new-onset blood pressure elevations of 130 to 139/80 to 89 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation before delivery admission. The primary outcome was the development of a hypertensive disorder in pregnancy at hospital admission or during delivery. Clinical outcomes were assessed using χ2 test and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 2090 normotensive women from our cohort who were analyzed, 1318 (63.0%) remained normotensive for their entire antenatal course before delivery admission and 772 (37.0%) had new-onset blood pressure elevations between 130 and 139/80 and 89 mm Hg. Women with new-onset blood pressure elevations between 130 and 139/80 and 89 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation have a significantly increased risk for developing a hypertensive disorder in pregnancy at admission or during delivery (adjusted relative risk, 2.41; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-2.85) including an almost 3-fold increased risk for preeclampsia with severe features, even after adjusting for confounders. There were no differences in other secondary obstetrical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Normotensive women with new-onset blood pressures elevations between 130 and 139/80 and 89 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation are more likely to experience hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and preeclampsia with severe features at or during their delivery hospitalization. These more modest blood pressure elevations may be an early indicator of disease and call into question our current blood pressure threshold for diagnosis of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.