Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 14: E118, 2017 11 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29166249

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transportation and land-use policies can affect the physical activity of populations. Local health departments (LHDs) are encouraged to participate in built-environment policy processes, which are outside their traditional expertise. Cross-sector collaborations are needed, yet stakeholders' perceptions of LHD involvement are not well understood. The objective of this study was to describe the perceived value of LHD participation in transportation and land-use decision making and potential contributions to these processes among stakeholders. METHODS: We analyzed qualitative data from 49 semistructured interviews in 2015. Participants were professionals in 13 US states and 4 disciplines: land-use planning (n = 13), transportation/public works (n = 11), public health (n = 19), and other (municipal administration and bike and pedestrian advocacy [n = 6]). Two analysts conducted directed content analysis. RESULTS: All respondents reported that LHDs offer valuable contributions to transportation and land-use policy processes. They identified 7 contributions (interrater agreement 91%): 1) physical activity and health perspective (n = 44), 2) data analysis and assessment (n = 41), 3) partnerships in the community and across sectors (n = 35), 4) public education (n = 27), 5) knowledge of the public health evidence base and best practices (n = 23), 6) resource support (eg, grant writing, technical assistance) (n = 20), and 7) health equity (n = 8). CONCLUSION: LHDs can leverage their strengths to foster cross-sector collaborations that promote physical activity opportunities in communities. Our results will inform development of sustainable capacity-building models for LHD involvement in built-environment decision making.


Subject(s)
Environment Design , Local Government , Planning Techniques , Public Health Administration , Transportation , Capacity Building , Health Promotion , Humans , Interinstitutional Relations
3.
Am J Public Health ; 105(3): 490-6, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25602875

ABSTRACT

Zoning and other land-use policies are a promising but controversial strategy to improve community food environments. To understand how these policies are debated, we searched existing databases and the Internet and analyzed news coverage and legal documentation of efforts to restrict fast-food restaurants in 77 US communities in 2001 to 2013. Policies intended to improve community health were most often proposed in urban, racially diverse communities; policies proposed in small towns or majority-White communities aimed to protect community aesthetics or local businesses. Health-focused policies were subject to more criticism than other policies and were generally less successful. Our findings could inform the work of advocates interested in employing land-use policies to improve the food environment in their own communities.


Subject(s)
City Planning/legislation & jurisprudence , Environment Design/legislation & jurisprudence , Fast Foods/supply & distribution , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Residence Characteristics , Restaurants/legislation & jurisprudence , Bibliometrics , City Planning/trends , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Environment Design/trends , Fast Foods/standards , Government Regulation , Health Policy/trends , Humans , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Local Government , Newspapers as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Restaurants/classification , Restaurants/statistics & numerical data , United States
4.
Annu Rev Public Health ; 33: 307-24, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22224883

ABSTRACT

The U.S. population is facing an obesity crisis wrought with severe health and economic costs. Because social and environmental factors have a powerful influence over lifestyle choices, a national obesity prevention strategy must involve population-based interventions targeted at the places where people live, study, work, shop, and play. This means that policy, in addition to personal responsibility, must be part of the solution. This article first describes the emergence of and theory behind the obesity prevention movement. It then explains how government at all levels is empowered to develop obesity prevention policy. Finally, it explores eight attributes of a promising state or local obesity prevention policy and sets the obesity prevention movement in the context of a larger movement to promote healthy communities and prevent chronic disease.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/prevention & control , Humans , Life Style , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...