The unnecessary use of short tandem repeat testing on bone marrow samples in patients after 1 year following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the information provided by short tandem repeat (STR) testing and bone marrow (BM) biopsy specimens following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) provides redundant information, leading to test overutilization, without additional clinical benefit. METHODS: Cases with synchronous STR and flow cytometric immunophenotyping (FCI) testing, as part of the BM evaluation, were assessed for STR/FCI concordance. RESULTS: Of 1199 cases (410 patients), we found the overall concordance between STR and FCI was 93%, with most cases (1063) classified as STR-/FCI-. Of all discordant cases, 75 (6%) were STR+/FCI-, with only 5 (6.7%) cases best explained as identification of disease relapse. Eight cases were STR-/FCI+, representing relapsed/residual disease. Analysis of cases 1 year or more from transplant (54% of all cases) indicated only 9 (1.5%) were STR+/FCI-, and none uniquely identified relapse. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that STR analysis performed 1 year or more post-HSCT does not identify unknown cases of relapse. Furthermore, while STR testing is critical for identifying graft failure/rejection within the first year posttransplant, FCI appears superior to STR at detecting late relapses with low-level disease. Therefore, STR testing from patients 1 year or more post-HSCT may be unnecessary, as BM biopsy evaluation is sufficient to identify disease relapse.

Electronic charting of transfusion medicine consults: implementation, challenges and opportunities.

BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission lists improving staff communication (handoffs) as part of several National Safety Goals. In this study, we developed an electronic web-based charting system for clinical pathology handoffs, which primarily consist of transfusion medicine calls, and evaluated the advantages over a paper-based handwritten call log. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secure online web browser application using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) was designed to document on-call pathology resident consults. A year after implementation, an online survey was administered to our pathology residents in order to evaluate and compare the usability of the electronic application (e-consults) to the previous handwritten call log, which was a notebook where trainees hand wrote different components of the consult. RESULTS: The REDCap web-based application includes discrete fields for patients' information, requesting physician contact, type of consult, action items for follow-up and faculty responses, as well as other information. These components have eventually progressed to be an online consult call catalog. With approximately 1079 consults per year, transfusion medicine-related calls account for ~90% of the encounters, while clinical chemistry, microbiology and immunology calls constitute the remainder. The overall response rate of the survey was 96% (29 of 30 participants). Of the 16 respondents who experienced both call log systems, 100% responded that REDCap was an improvement over the handwritten call log (P < 0·0001). CONCLUSION: E-consult documentation entered into a web-based application was a user-friendly, secure clinical information access and effective handoff system as compared to a paper-based handwritten call log.