What's new in atopic eczema? An analysis of systematic reviews published in 2018. Part 2: systemic therapies.

This review forms part of an annual update series on atopic eczema (AE), where systematic reviews (SRs) are gathered and appraised to provide a summary of key recent research findings. The focus of this article is systemic therapies used in AE, while a review on prevention and topical therapies is provided in Part 1. In total, 17 SRs on various systemic treatments used in AE were first published or indexed in 2018. There is a lack of evidence to support vitamin D supplementation, montelukast and naltrexone in AE treatment. The adverse effects of systemic corticosteroids are the main barrier to their use, and there is also a lack of data to determine the optimal delivery and duration of treatment with them. Of other immunosuppressants, ciclosporin has the most robust evidence of efficacy. Biologic therapies in AE treatment are being increasingly investigated, and to date, the greatest quantity of data and evidence of efficacy relates to dupilumab. The most commonly reported adverse effects are injection-site reactions and conjunctivitis. Other biologics showing some evidence of efficacy include nemolizumab, lebrikizumab and tralokinumab, although further data are needed. There are currently insufficient data on oral small molecules, including Janus kinase inhibitors, in the treatment of AE. A Cochrane review on probiotics showed no significant benefit, and SRs and meta-analyses on complementary and alternative medicines, including probiotics, in paediatric AE demonstrated significant heterogeneity, thereby limiting their interpretation. This summary of recent SRs provides up-to-date evidence for clinicians on systemic therapies in AE.

'Stockholm syndrome': psychiatric diagnosis or urban myth?

OBJECTIVE: 'Stockholm syndrome' is a term used to describe the positive bond some kidnap victims develop with their captor. High-profile cases are reported by the media although the diagnosis is not described in any international classification system. Here we review the evidence base on 'Stockholm syndrome'. METHOD: Databases (PubMED, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL) were systematically searched. We compared features of cases widely reported in the English language media to identify common themes which may form a recognizable syndrome. RESULTS: We identified 12 papers that met inclusion criteria. The existing literature consists mostly of case reports; furthermore there is ambiguity in the use of the term. No validated diagnostic criteria have been described. Four common features were found between the five cases studied. CONCLUSION: There is little published academic research on 'Stockholm syndrome' although study of media reports reveals similarities between well publicized cases. This may be due to reporting and publication bias.

Evidence that parenteral testosterone therapy may improve endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation in postmenopausal women already receiving estrogen.

The gender difference in cardiovascular disease has been partly attributed to higher androgenic hormone levels. Although testosterone in women may not affect lipids, it remains unknown whether it negates favorable estrogenic effects on endothelial function. We have investigated the effects of testosterone implant therapy on arterial reactivity encompassing endothelial-dependent and -independent vasodilation in women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT). B-mode ultrasound measurements of resting brachial artery diameter, following reactive hyperemia [endothelium-dependent flow- mediated dilation (FMD)] and following glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (endothelium-independent dilation), were recorded in 33 postmenopausal women stabilized on HRT (>6 months), at baseline, and 6 weeks after a testosterone implant (50 mg), with 15 postmenopausal nonusers of HRT serving as controls. In the brachial artery, baseline resting diameter was similar (0.40 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.01 cm, P = 0.5). In the treated group, testosterone levels increased (0.99 +/- 0.08 to 4.99 +/- 0.3 nmol/L, P < 0.001), associated with a mean 42% increase in FMD (6.4% +/- 0.7 to 9.1% +/- 1.1, P = 0.03). The control group did not change (8.1% +/- 1.4 to 5.6% +/- 1.0, P = 0.4). ANOVA of repeated measures (P = 0.04) and mean change (P = 0.02) in FMD both demonstrated significantly greater improvement with testosterone compared with controls. GTN induced vasodilation increased with testosterone treatment (14.9% +/- 0.9 to 17.8% +/- 1.2, P = 0.03). Our preliminary data indicate that parenteral testosterone therapy improves both endothelial-dependent (flow-mediated) and endothelium-independent (GTN-mediated) brachial artery vasodilation in postmenopausal women using long-term estrogen therapy. The mechanisms underlying these potentially beneficial cardiovascular effects require further investigation.