Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aust N Z J Med ; 27(5): 568-77, 1997 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9404589

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Relatives of patients with coronary heart disease have a heightened risk of cardiovascular disease. Attendance at a family-based screening clinic after an acute cardiac event could motivate patients and relatives to modify their lifestyles. AIMS: The Family Atherosclerosis Risk Intervention Study (FARIS) aimed to determine (i) whether a high proportion of patients and relatives would attend a special screening and prevention programme; (ii) whether the risk factor profiles of relatives would be worse than those in the general community; and (iii) whether ongoing management of patients and families together in a special clinic would improve risk factor profiles. METHODS: Consecutive patients, together with spouse, siblings and offspring, aged 18 to 69 years, were randomly allocated three months after an acute cardiac event to attend a special outpatient clinic, a screening and advice group, or a control group. Risk factor measures were total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol (HDLC), systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI) and smoking behaviour. This paper presents the risk factor profiles of all FARIS attenders and compares those of family members, age adjusted, with risk factors measured in a multicentre urban cross-sectional survey conducted in the same period. Differences between groups were compared using t-tests for numerical variables and ANOVA and chi-square for categorical variables. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty-eight patients and 1723 family members were enrolled, representing 85.9% and 82.7% of eligible patients and relatives respectively. Risk factors were significantly worse amongst family members than among those in the population survey.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Coronary Disease/complications , Family Health , Health Promotion , Life Style , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cholesterol/blood , Coronary Disease/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Victoria/epidemiology
2.
BMJ ; 307(6914): 1244-7, 1993 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8281056

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a group programme of light exercise could improve quality of life in patients after acute myocardial infarction to the same extent as a high intensity exercise training programme. SETTING: Australian teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 224 men from a consecutive series of 339 men under 70 admitted to a coronary care unit with transmural acute myocardial infarction. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated in hospital to a group programme lasting eight weeks of either high intensity exercise training or light exercise. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical working capacity based on metabolic equivalents achieved from treadmill exercise tests at entry, after 11 weeks, and after one year. Quality of life based on self report scores of anxiety, depression, denial, and wellbeing and interview assessments of activities and psychosocial adjustment at entry, after four months, and after one year. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched at entry. At 11 weeks the mean results of treadmill testing were 10.7 (95% confidence interval 10.20 to 11.20) metabolic equivalents for exercise training and 9.7 (9.26 to 10.14) for light exercise (t = 2.85, df = 181, p = 0.005). Apart from this small temporary benefit in mean physical working capacity, there were no significant differences between groups. Improvement in occupational adjustment score from baseline to four months was greater after exercise training than after light exercise, but at one year repeated measures analysis of variance showed no significant effects of treatment or interaction between treatment and time point. CONCLUSION: The effects on quality of life of a low cost programme of light exercise are similar to those obtained from a high intensity exercise training programme.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Myocardial Infarction/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Behavior , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/psychology , Rehabilitation, Vocational , Social Adjustment
3.
BMJ ; 305(6856): 773, 1992 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1422348
4.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 21(1): 97-100, 1992 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1590666

ABSTRACT

This paper comments upon patterns of behavioural change after acute cardiac illness and discusses determinants of longterm compliance with advice. The importance of comprehensive rehabilitation during convalescence is emphasised. Education, motivation and support of the patients are essential for the adoption of healthier lifestyles. Despite comprehensive rehabilitation, however, recidivism to former habits is common, particularly with smoking and physical inactivity. This is partly determined by premorbid social and personality characteristics of patients. Social and behavioural support at the workplace and within the community may well be of significant benefit in supporting patients to maintain their necessary health behaviour changes. Some of the evidence related to these issues is discussed and recommendations are made regarding future directions for patient support.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy , Coronary Disease/rehabilitation , Humans , Patient Compliance , Patient Education as Topic , Recurrence , Social Environment
5.
Br Heart J ; 65(3): 126-31, 1991 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2015119

ABSTRACT

Does a programme of light exercise training after acute myocardial infarction produce the same improvement in treadmill performance as aerobic exercise training? Three hundred and eight men from a consecutive series of 479 men with transmural (Q wave) acute myocardial infarction, admitted to a single coronary care unit, were randomly allocated to eight weeks of group aerobic exercise training or group light exercise. Groups were well matched for all characteristics other than site of infarction, which did not significantly affect results. Mean (SD) physical working capacity (metabolic equivalents) determined by treadmill testing at the start of the study (in the third week after infarction) was 6.8 (2.2) v 6.7 (2.5) METs, at the end (in the eleventh week after infarction) 10.8 (2.3) v 9.9 (2.4) METs, and at 12 month review 10.8 (2.4) v 10.7 (1.9) METs for the exercise training group and the light exercise group respectively. The difference of 0.9 METs at the end of the study was the only significant difference between groups. There were no significant intergroup differences at any stage in resting and maximal heart rate, resting and maximal systolic blood pressure, or rate-pressure product. Apart from a small temporarily greater physical working capacity, the physical benefits of aerobic exercise training were equally well achieved by group light exercise.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy/methods , Myocardial Infarction/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure/physiology , Electrocardiography , Exercise Test , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...