Distribution of Bacterial Species and Resistance Patterns in Surgical Site Infection after Prior Administration of Vancomycin and Tobramycin Intrawound Powdered Antibiotic Prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the species distribution and resistance patterns of bacterial pathogens causing surgical site infection (SSI) after operative fracture repair, with and without the use of intrawound powdered antibiotic (IPA) prophylaxis during the index surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic, level 1 trauma center, 2018-2020. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine deep SSIs were identified in a sample of 734 patients with 846 fractures (IPA [n = 320], control [n = 526]; open [n = 157], closed fractures [n = 689]) who underwent orthopaedic fracture care. Among SSIs, 28 (48%) patients received IPA prophylaxis and 25 (42%) of the fractures were open. INTERVENTION: Intrawound powdered vancomycin and tobramycin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Distribution of bacterial species and resistance patterns causing deep surgical site infections requiring operative debridement. RESULTS: Zero patients developed infections caused by resistant strains of streptococci, enterococci, gram-negative enterics, Pseudomonas , or Cutibacterium species. The only resistant strains isolated were methicillin resistance (19%) and oxacillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (16%). There was no associated statistical difference in the proportion of bacterial species isolated, their resistance profiles, or rate of polymicrobial infections between the IPA and control group. Most (93%) cases using IPAs included vancomycin and tobramycin powders. There were 59 SSIs; 28 (9%) in the IPA cohort and 31 (6%) in the control cohort ( P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: The use of local antibiotic prophylaxis resulted in no measurable increase in the proportion of infections caused by resistant bacterial pathogens after operative treatment of fractures. However, the small sample size and limited time frame of these preliminary data require continued investigation into their role as an adjunct to SSI prophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mycobacterium avium complex olecranon bursitis resolves without antimicrobials or surgical intervention: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Nontuberculous mycobacteria are an uncommon cause of septic olecranon bursitis, though cases have increasingly been described in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent hosts. Guidelines recommend a combination of surgical resection and antimicrobials for treatment. This case is the first reported case of nontuberculous mycobacterial olecranon bursitis that resolved without medical or surgical intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old female developed a painless, fluctuant swelling of the olecranon bursa following blunt trauma to the elbow. Due to persistent bursal swelling, she underwent three separate therapeutic bursal aspirations, two involving intrabursal steroid injection. After the third aspiration, the bursa became erythematous and severely swollen, and bursal fluid grew Mycobacterium avium complex. Triple-drug antimycobacterial therapy was initiated, but discontinued abruptly due to a rash. Surgery was not performed. The patient was observed off antimicrobials, and gradually clinically improved with a compressive dressing. By 14 months after initial presentation, clinical exam revealed complete resolution of the previously erythematous bursal mass. DISCUSSION: This is the first reported case of nontuberculous mycobacterial olecranon bursitis managed successfully without surgery or antimicrobials. Musculoskeletal nontuberculous mycobacterial infections are challenging given the lack of clinical data about optimal duration and choice of antimicrobials or the role of surgery. Additionally, the potential toxicity and drug interactions of antimycobacterials are not insignificant and warrant close monitoring if treatment is pursued. CONCLUSION: This case raises an important clinical question of whether close observation off antimicrobials is appropriate in select cases of immunocompetent patients with localized atypical mycobacterial disease of soft tissue and skeletal structures.