Post-remission cytopenia management in patients with AML treated with venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents: Pre- versus post-VIALE-A real-world experience from a predominantly US community setting.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study used an electronic health record-derived, de-identified, US patient-level database to better understand the real-world treatment experience, in a predominantly community setting (80.3% of patients), of venetoclax+hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in routine clinical care, pre- and post-VIALE-A, to determine whether the post-remission cytopenia management insight from VIALE-A was reflected in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML; N = 498), who initiated venetoclax+HMA ≤30 days from AML diagnosis from June 1, 2018, to March 31, 2021, were stratified into pre-(n = 330) and post-(n = 168) VIALE-A cohorts. RESULTS: More patients in the post-(61%) versus pre-(45%) VIALE-A cohort had their first biopsy by 28 ± 14 days post-treatment initiation. Patients underwent bone marrow (BM) assessment earlier in the post- versus pre-VIALE-A cohort, and first identification of response was also earlier (2.5 vs 5.1 months, respectively). More venetoclax schedule modifications post-remission occurred among post-(82.1%) versus pre-(73.8%) VIALE-A responders; the most common reason for modification was treatment toxicities, specifically cytopenia. Treatment survival outcomes were comparable with or without venetoclax schedule modifications. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that venetoclax schedule modifications can be used to manage cytopenia events without adversely affecting outcomes. Opportunities remain to improve earlier BM assessment to determine venetoclax schedule modifications, providing the best chance for optimal treatment outcomes.

Utility of end of induction bone marrow biopsy and survival outcomes in acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with fixed-dose induction regimen.

Significant variations exist related to the end of induction practices in the management of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL). These variations include all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-arsenic trioxide (ATO) in fixed doses versus continuation until hematologic complete remission (CR) and performance versus omission of post-induction bone marrow biopsy to confirm morphological CR. A retrospective chart review was conducted of 61 patients (42 low/intermediate-risk and 19 high-risk) aged ≥ 18 years with newly diagnosed APL treated with fixed duration ATRA-ATO +/- cytoreduction at a tertiary medical center from December 2012 through March 2020. Of the 54 patients with post-induction bone marrow biopsy results, 52 (96%) demonstrated no morphologic evidence of APL while the remaining were equivocal. After 2.6 years median follow-up, no relapses occurred. The estimated 2-year overall survival rate of 95% suggests excellent outcomes with a fixed ATO induction regimen and safe omission of post-induction bone marrow biopsy irrespective of hematologic parameters.

IDH1 inhibitor-induced neutrophilic dermatosis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia.

Ivosidenib is an oral inhibitor of mutant Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). It is approved for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and patients with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutated AML who are 75 years or older or those who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapy. While generally well tolerated, differentiation syndrome has been reported in 15-20% of patients. Here, we report a case of acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis or Sweet's syndrome in conjunction with the use of ivosidenib for the treatment of relapsed AML. We discuss the clinical presentation of this rare entity, review relevant literature, and comment on its association with differentiation syndrome.

Tumor lysis syndrome and infectious complications during treatment with venetoclax combined with azacitidine or decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with azacitidine or decitabine (hypomethylating agent; HMA) is the standard-of-care treatment for older (≥75 years) or intensive chemotherapy ineligible adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and infectious complications are two of the most concerning associated adverse events. We studied the real-world incidence and outcomes of these adverse events with HMA/Ven in AML patients. Our retrospective analysis included 106 patients (median age 70 years). Of these, 61 (58%) received HMA/Ven in frontline setting while 45 (42%) received in salvage setting. 19 (18%) met laboratory criteria for TLS, five (5%) developed clinical TLS (acute kidney injury). The median time to develop TLS was 2 days (range -2 to 4). During cycle 1, 29 patients (27%) were diagnosed with febrile neutropenia while 26 (25%) developed new infections. Median time to development of new infection was 10 days (1-25). Pneumonia was the most common infection (8%). Febrile neutropenia and/or new infection during cycle 1 was associated with poorer median overall survival compared to those without these complications (4.9 months vs 11.6 months; p = 0.03). In conclusion, incidence of TLS and infections was high in our cohort during initiation of HMA/Ven therapy. This data emphasizes the need for closer monitoring in these patients, especially during the first 7-10 days of treatment, which is often achieved in the inpatient setting.

Collaborative cardiovascular management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia on tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of the BCR-ABL fusion protein have dramatically changed the mortality of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but they carry a risk of serious vascular morbidity. While TKIs do not cure CML, daily oral administration of a TKI can control CML and TKIs are chronic medications. Interestingly, vascular complications can occur at any time a patient is on a TKI. Therefore, it is imperative that all care team members and patients are aware of and watching for possible vascular complications. In the following review, a case of arterial thrombosis secondary to the TKI ponatinib is presented as well as a discussion of thrombotic and vascular adverse events reported with TKIs. TKIs are metabolized through the cytochrome P450 system and important drug interactions to consider are reviewed. Finally, we present a multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with CML on TKIs.