Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurodegener Dis Manag ; 12(1): 9-14, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35112573

ABSTRACT

What is this summary about?: This is a plain language summary of an article originally published in the journal Frontiers in Neurology. People with multiple sclerosis (often shortened to MS) may have concerns about pregnancy and fertility. To understand more about these concerns, 332 people with MS in the USA, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain took a survey with questions about how they made family planning decisions. What were the results?: Most of the survey participants (around 82%) were women. The survey found that people with MS were less likely to have children than people without MS. Over half (56%) of people with MS said the disease impacted their family planning decisions in some way, almost one quarter (22%) significantly changed their plans for the timing of their pregnancy or number of children, and 14% decided against having children. For almost 4 out of 5 (81%) people with MS the main source of family planning information was healthcare professionals. What do the results of the study mean?: Overall, MS significantly impacted patients' decisions about family planning.


Subject(s)
Family Planning Services , Multiple Sclerosis , Child , Female , Germany , Humans , Language , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Front Neurol ; 12: 620772, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33995240

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The majority of people diagnosed with MS are of childbearing or child fathering age, therefore family planning is an important issue for both women and men with MS. Fertility and the course of pregnancy are not affected by MS; however, people with MS (pwMS) may have concerns that there will be a greater risk of complications to the mother and/or adverse pregnancy outcomes either due to the disease or to ongoing medication. This survey aimed to understand family planning decision making in pwMS and related unmet educational needs. Methods: A total of 332 pwMS across the USA, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain were recruited from a specialist patient panel agency to participate in a smartphone-enabled standing panel. The 80-question survey focussed on decision making and information sources for pwMS regarding family planning, as well as behavior during and after pregnancy. Male patients with MS did not respond to specific questions on pregnancy. Survey results were directly compared with the 2016 US and 2010 UN census data. Results: pwMS were more likely to have no children than the general population, particularly in the subgroup of patients aged 36-45 years. A total of 56% of pwMS reported that the disease affected, with different degrees of impact, their family planning decision making. Of these, 21% significantly changed their plans for timing of pregnancy and the number of children, and 14% decided against having children. Participants indicated that healthcare professionals were the primary source of information on family planning (81% of responses). The timing of planned pregnancy was not considered when selecting treatment by 78% of participants. Conclusion: MS was found to significantly impact family planning decision making, with pwMS significantly less likely to have children in comparison with the general population.

3.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv ; 15(5): 435-442, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29521156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Owing to the wide-ranging role nurses have in supporting patients undergoing fertility treatment, we recorded the learning/teaching expectations and experiences of nurses using a redesigned fertility pen injector. METHODS: This was a multicentre, simulated-use study, using unbranded placebo-filled pens. Before teaching patients, nurses were given free choice to rank the importance of the device attributes and predict the level of patient anxiety. Nurses taught 2-5 patients how to prepare the device, inject the dose and complete an incomplete dose. They rated the teaching experience on a 5-point scale during a questionnaire interview. RESULTS: Thirty nurses were enrolled across four countries. All nurses found the redesigned fertility pen injector easy to use and teach. 90% found the overall administration process easy to learn and teach. More than 80% (range 83%-100%) found each of the steps easy (score 4 or 5), and most found the steps easier to teach than expected (score 4 or 5; range 57%-90%). 97% would recommend the redesigned fertility pen injector to a colleague. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses rated the redesigned fertility pen injector easy to learn and use and easier to teach than expected. Most would recommend the device to a colleague.


Subject(s)
Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human/administration & dosage , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Nurses/psychology , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/instrumentation , Adolescent , Adult , Equipment Design , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Self Administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv ; 14(4): 473-481, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28140682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the overall impressions of learning and subsequent use of the redesigned GONAL-f® (follitropin alfa) pen injector by women with recent or current infertility requiring assisted reproductive technologies (ART) or in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This was a simulated-use study including 86 women with infertility and 30 fertility nurses. Nurses trained the women on the use of the redesigned pen. The opinions of the women on the pen injector were collected during a questionnaire interview. Fertility nurse opinions on patient anxiety were collected before training. RESULTS: The pen injector was considered easy to learn to use and easy to use, particularly setting the dose and reading the number on the dial. After training, most women felt confident they could self-administer medication without further training. Most women would recommend the redesigned pen injector to friends and family requiring IVF treatment. Overall, fertility nurses overestimated how anxious the women would be when using the pen injector. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that both IVF/ART-experienced and -naïve women with infertility found the redesigned pen injector easy to learn to use and to use.


Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human/administration & dosage , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Infertility, Female/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Nurses , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Self Administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...