Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Teach ; 43(8): 960-965, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131374

ABSTRACT

Despite feedback being widely-used by health professions educators as a tool to develop clinical competencies, strategies to guide its successful implementation remain limited. In addition, health professions learners are often dissatisfied with the quality and/or volume of feedback they receive. Efforts to better engage learners in feedback processes have resulted in the development of a number of theoretical frameworks to guide educators, one being feedback literacy. Feedback literacy can be conceptualised as a learner's ability to recognise, comprehend, generate, and take action on feedback they encounter during their learning to aid health professions learners' clinical competency development. Here, we draw on both a conceptual framework of feedback literacy and other contemporary feedback literature to provide 12 practical tips by which feedback literacy can be developed in health professions learners.


Subject(s)
Health Occupations , Literacy , Clinical Competence , Feedback , Humans , Learning
2.
Anat Sci Educ ; 13(6): 769-777, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32163665

ABSTRACT

Student engagement is known to have several positive effects on learning outcomes and can impact a student's university experience. High levels of engagement in content-heavy subjects can be difficult to attain. Due to a major institutional restructure, the anatomy prosection laboratory time per subject was dramatically reduced. In response, the authors set out to redesign their anatomy units with a focus on engaging the learning activities that would increase time-on-task both within and outside of the classroom. One of these curriculum changes was the implementation of a suite of anatomy learning activities centered on sets of three-dimensional printed upper limb skeleton models. A two-part mixed-method sequential exploratory design was used to evaluate these activities. Part one was a questionnaire that evaluated the students' engagement with and perceptions of the models. Part two involved focus groups interviews, which were an extension of the survey questions in part one. The results of the study indicated that the majority of students found the models to be an engaging resource that helped improve their study habits. As a result, students strongly felt that the use of the models inspired greater academic confidence and overall better performance in their assessments. Overall, the models were an effective way of increasing the engagement and deep learning, and reinforced previous findings from the medical education research. Future research should investigate the effects of these models on student's grades within osteopathy and other allied health courses.


Subject(s)
Anatomy/education , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Models, Anatomic , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Educational Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Focus Groups , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Models, Educational , Osteopathic Medicine/education , Program Evaluation , Qualitative Research , Stakeholder Participation , Students, Medical/psychology , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Universities/organization & administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...